1/
Yesterday we found out @ginacarano was fired from Star Wars over Social Media posts

Lots of people talk about cancel culture, but so far no one has given a serious account of exactly what cancel culture is, where it comes from, and how it works

So, Cancel Culture

A Thread🧵
2/
There's a lot of confusion around cancel culture both because cancel culture is a new phenomenon, and because some people have dishonestly and cynically misused the term in order to score political points. So let's try to get clear about EXACTLY what's cancel culture is.
3/
To begin, I need to say something about "free speech."

Free Speech is not *only* a legal principle. It is that, but it isn't *just* that. Free speech is also an enlightenment liberal **VALUE**

Read that last sentence again because it's the beating heart of my thinking here.
4/
Enlightenment Liberals know that exchanging ideas is how we solve problems. Our problem solving mechanism is to exchange information, ideas, perspectives, and suggestions in order to examine them and determine what is true, what is false, and which path forward is best.
5/
This means that for the Enlightenment Liberal the truth is determined not by force, but through an open, rigorous, careful examination of the facts.

That means that enlightenment liberals do not (and should not) try to "win" debates over truth by monopolizing the microphone
6/
or preventing someone else from having their ideas heard. The goal of the enlightenment liberal is to ensure ideas are carefully examined refined ideas using such things as reason, rationality, science, math and logic.

The goal is to enable people sift through ideas...
7/
and determine their merit.

In order to do that people must be able to say what they *actually think* so their ideas can be understood and criticized by others.

Free speech is the mechanism we use to subject our ideas to other people for feedback.

Read that again.
8/
So, for the enlightenment liberal, the goal is to create a situation where there is a marketplace of ideas where various ideas can be subjected to testing, criticism, and refinement so that the best ideas can be taken forward the ideas that don't work can be left behind.
9/
It is this vision of free speech that is being attacked by Cancel Culture.

So now lets take a good look at cancel culture so we can see how it attacks the value of free speech....
10/
Cancel culture is a type of social speech policing. Social speech policing is attempting to enforce ideological conformity by using social power to marginalize your opponent rather then seeking to persuade others by engaging with the substance of the disagreement.
11/
Governments without free speech laws often jail dissenters as a form of social speech policing.

Now, because the United States has the first amendment, people cannot enforce their ideology using the force of government so they have to do social speech policing some other way
12/
This is where cancel culture comes in.

Cancel Culture is an attempt to do via culture what is impossible via government (thanks to the 1A):

Create or take over power structures in order to enforce an ideology across the whole of our society.

Read that again. And again.
13/
Cancel culture is a hack of society that distills

1. Social media
2. Clout/social power
3. Capitalism (everyone needs a job)

into a speech policing death-star that operates according to the idea that while the Government can't punish you for speech, other citizens can.
14/
The most common form of cancel culture is using social media to create mobs that create social and financial consequences for people who hold views the cancelers don't like.

Usually the cancelers seek to get a person fired but they sometimes settle for reputation destruction
15/
This is what people are talking about when they talk about cancel culture. It's not that there's a shortage of platforms from which to express an opinion, nor are they upset about garden variety shunning (I'm not your friend, you can't come to my birthday etc) from peers...
16/
Cancel culture means a guy I've never met, in a state I don't live, can see a video I didn't film, of a thing I didn't say to him, and get me fried from my job providing a service he doesn't use.

This is new.

And *THIS* is what people mean by cancel culture.
17/
Social Speech policing comes from the left and right, but Cancel culture is largely a "woke" phenomenon.

The right and center feel a certain strain of "woke" leftism has conquered the arts, the corporate world, and academia, and uses that power to cancel anyone who disagrees
18/
That said, social speech policing can go against the left to. Socialist Nathan Robinson was fired from the guardian for tweets critical of Israel.

(he says it was cancel culture, I think it was social speech policing not cancel culture, but it's unacceptable either way)
19/
The irony is Nathan Robinson had said Cancel Culture doesn't exist, and that Bari Weiss and Bret Stephens should be fired from the NYT.

People tend to *LOVE* policing speech and handing out "consequences" and "accountability" so long as THEY are the ones doing the policing.
20/
The issue here is again not a legal one. The guardian can fire who they want, but that misses the point. The IMPULSE here is the same, to silence him rather than argue with him.

The goal was not to argue about American foreign policy, the goal was to silence dissenting views
21/
Now, I don't think Mr. Robinson's case was cancel culture as I did not see a social media campaign, the hallmark of cancel culture. But that's not the point. The point is the chilling effect these sorts of firings have and how they make people afraid to speak their mind.
22/
This is what is most harmful. When people are trying to put their finger on a problem they often do it badly to start. They formulate it badly, or insensitively, or blame the wrong issue, or whatever. If we cancel anyone who gets things wrong people stop taking risks...
23/
They stop stepping outside the narrow band of popular opinion for fear of their job. This has the perverse effect of meaning that only the wealthy can afford the risk of losing their job to suggest new ideas.

As always, the sword of illiberal ideas falls hardest on the poor
24/
This is why Cancel Culture is so pernicious. Cancelers think they can overtake the institutions and put a boot on the neck of people who dare dissent, but one day the roles will reverse creating a pendulum of people cancelling back and forth depending on who has power...
25/
This is why we must oppose Cancel Culture *NOW,* before the pendulum gets too much momentum. If reactionaries should get power when the pendulum swings back it will be a disaster.

This is why we must have a return to the *VALUE* of free speech and freedom of expression...
26/
We must bring back charitable interpretations and a willingness to allow people to make mistakes and hold views that are different then our own.

We must be liberals.

/fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Wokal Distance

Wokal Distance Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wokal_distance

8 Feb
1/
IMPACT NOT INTENT!

The idea is that it doesn't matter what you meant to say, all that matters is if someones feelings were hurt.
This idea from woke academic literature is destroying our ability to communicate; to fight it we must understand it.

Impact not intent

A Thread🧵
2/
The conceptual machinery that created "impact not intent" has 2 parts

1. The collapse of the use/mention distinction

2. The "Death of the Author" thesis that says the person who says/writes something doesn't get to say how it should be interpreted

I'll explain them in turn
3/
I'll explain the use/mention distinction, give an example, then show how "woke" academics attacked it.

The use/mention distinction is simple. Lets use "cheese" as an example.

You can *USE* the word: "where's the CHEESE?"
You can *MENTION* the word: "How is 'CHEESE' spelled"
Read 37 tweets
5 Feb
1/
By focusing on immuteable characteristics (like race or sex) and making someones identity about those things wokeness, critical theory, and critical race theory ends up justifying, defending, and spreading racism and bigotry.

By dividing people into groups based on...
2/
things that are totally outside of someone's control (IE: nobody can select their skin color)
Wokeness/CRT makes things totally outside someone's control the central focus of their identity, even if a person doesn't want their skin color to be the foundation of their identity
3/
For example, I'm Jewish, white, male, and straight. I don't want people to judge my character based on any of those things. I want those things to take a backseat to who I am as an individual.

I want to be judged by what I say and do, not by things I have no control over.
Read 12 tweets
5 Feb
You fully endorse CRT, and defend it regularly, while calling anyone against it "chicken littles."
I just gave you two examples of antisemitism directly from CRT literature.

Here are some examples of antisemitism against me (My mom is Jewish, which makes me a Jew by Halakha) ImageImageImageImage
That doesn't make me right (standpoint is junk) it just means I have skin in the game.
I've never once heard you speak against antisemitism on the left, or in CRT. But I'm consistent @worldviewconvos even blocked me when I called out his confederacy stuff:
But now you want to jump all over @ConceptualJames and pretend he's an antisemite?

Absolutely the hell not.
My point here is to put an end to the garbage people are spewing about @ConceptualJames.

BTW I absolutely call out antisemites when they show up. Here are examples: ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
2 Feb
AOC has 11 million followers, a netflix documentary, and was on the cover of for Vanity fair. We are told "don't worry, she has no influence."

MTG (who is nuts) won @ single house seat in a crowded primary and the GOP establishment in exile says that MTG now owns the party.
I don't dislike @DavidAFrench or @secupp, but I wish we could have some perspective. Yes, MTG is a nutty gasbag. That's bad.

But that misses the point: AOC is a cultural powerhouse who gets a pass from media on her radicalism becsise she shifts the overton window to the left
Using your radical fringe to move the overton window is an intentional strategy that comes out of left wing activist literature.

It's easy: amplify and echo the voices of those who take a position more radical than what you want so you look moderate by comparison:
Read 9 tweets
31 Jan
Eli's game is drawing cartoons of Jews (or those who take the side of Jews) he doesn't like using disgusting anti-semitic tropes.

Eli is Jewish but he uses "crticism of israel" as a fig leaf to wield anti-semitism against his political enemies.

I'm Jewish, and he is gross
Eli Vally's caftoons are used by David Duke, yes that David Duke, to justify his vitrolic antisemitism.
David Duke even wrote an article abkut how "Jews can say to Jewish audiences what Gentiles would not dare say" and he used Eli Valley as his main example.

Have a look:
Read 4 tweets
30 Jan
1/
For those attacking @ConceptualJames, here's what he's talking about:

Jenny Peto, who is Jewish, wrote a thesis "Victimhood of the Powerful" arguing white Jews have privilege but fake victimhood to get sympathy for themselves and empower Israel. The KKK could have written it:
2/
In her thesis she claims Ashkanazi Jews are white and use "Hegemonic Holocaust Education" as a tactic to reproduce the narrative that Jews are victims (pic 1). But she says Jews aren't oppressed and they fake victimhood to hide their privilige and benefit themselves (pic 2)
3/
She then says "March of the Living"
Where on Holocaust Remembrance Day students march from Auschwitz-Birkenau in memory of the Holocaust, then go to Israel to learn Israelis history is a program designed to help Jews "perform whiteness by seeing themselves as victims."

See:
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!