Has @ons thought this through ?....

The history of sex and gender is that once you unclip from reality things unravel much further than the officials that did the un-clipping anticipated, and each place which is unclipped accelerates unravelling elsewhere
In this case ONS say "sex" in the census can be what it says on your passport.

Meanwhile Christie Elan Cane is going to the Supreme Court to argue for "X" passports. It's not inconceivable that they might win

elancane.livejournal.com
Currently changing sex on a passport requires a doctor's note that a person is changing gender permanently.

An X passport wouldn't require this. It could just require ticking a box saying I would like X on my passport.
Because an X passport doesn't really mean that a person is "non binary" but just that they do not want their sex recorded.

It's not at all inconceivable that 10% upwards of younger age cohorts would tick this box because "gender is a spectrum "
So the ONS might think they are making a controlled step for a small group of individuals suddenly find they have lost the clarity on sex for a significant slice of the population, and they can't claw it back.

What then?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Maya Forstater

Maya Forstater Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MForstater

11 Feb
Penny Mordaunt today said that parliamentary drafting rules mean that it is not legal to say "pregnant women" in a law

She is really not keen on clarity about the word woman -- do you remember the Q&A she did at Mumsnet?
link.medium.com/h237otMvNdb
Read 4 tweets
11 Feb
MPs are discussing #MOMABill parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/37…

Proposed amendments leave out "person" and insert "woman"
@RachelReevesMP talks about If we are to encourage women from all backgrounds to become MPs and ministers - 102 years after women won the right to stand for parliament, there are still just 220 female MPs compared with 430 men
The first woman MP to have a baby while serving in parliament in 1976. She had to come into parliament 10 days after giving birth to vote.
Read 5 tweets
11 Feb
It is being asked whether #MOMABill needs to say "persons" instead of "women" in order to include females who have legally changed sex to male

My answer: no ...

The GRA is a legal fiction which allows for look throughs - it does not mean other laws can never refer to the sexes
It is recognised that it is necessary for the law to refer to the two sexes - in particular in matters around reproduction, and in anti discrimination law (as well as regulations relating to sport, buildings, healthcare etc...)
For example the laws around fertility treatment are specified as relating to women and men (in their respective biological roles). It is obvious as obvious can be that this refers to the big gamete people and the small gamete people
Read 8 tweets
11 Feb
How it started.. ...How its going
In 2002 The EcHR ruled in the case of Goodwin that not changing sex recorded on birth certificate breached the right of a post operative transsexual to a private life, and that changing it for a tiny number of people would have no substantive harm to public interest.
In 2021 it is being argued that because the resulting law gold plated this to allow people to change their legal sex without slteration to their body we can no longer have words for the two sexes, or use those words to recognise biological sex in law.
Read 4 tweets
11 Feb
Pattern recognition...

Why does this male person, Stonewall trans advisory group member, get coopted on to the Royal College of Obs and Gyne Womens Network where we get to advise doctors about the experience of patients?
Why was this male person, 10 years ago, already telling the EHRC how to talk about maternity?

What possible interest is it of Roz's, except that Roz wants the word woman?
Why did Brighton and Hove Hospital Trust ask this male person to review the language they tell midwives to use about their female patients?
Read 7 tweets
10 Feb
Following on from the discussion on single and separate sex services, and concern about confusion about how the Equality Act works.

Christine Burns says there is no problem...
But Stonewall say almost half of trans people don't feel comfortable using public toilets

stonewall.org.uk/lgbt-britain-t…
Galop says this a problem too

galop.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!