Interesting perspective from a long-term RSS Swayamsevak on the deracination of BJP/RSS.

What is the response of others in the Sangh to this? Does aversion to rituals and grihasth ashram deracinate? khullamkhulla.wordpress.com/2020/11/25/pat…
The language is a bit harsh and I’m not endorsing the viewpoint.

But it is true that RSS is largely a reformist and not a traditional org, unlike what its critics allege.

So it is worth a samvad about this issue.
Where I disagree is that BJP is equally deracinated as the Communists.
If Cong-Com were in power they’d bring the Communal Violence Bill for legal Hindu slaughter.

But yes, there is a danger in replicating Protestant critiques of “empty rituals” and being enamored of Scientism.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ

Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sankrant

10 Feb
Cultivation of Hindu hate comes from the needs of colonialism and evangelism, which seeded the academic memes to study India in the last 150 years.

Colonialism fashioned a "Sikh identity" in opposition to "Hindu" to serve the needs of the British army.

To control a Hindu civilizational state, different groups had to be split to regard the Hindu as the "other." "Sikh" creation was literally done via the army, which excluded non-keshadharis and even non-jats.

This is Macauliffe on the British Army fashioning the "Sikh religion."
Similarly, for the conversion of Indian, the evangelicals had to set up different groups in opposition. People were rooted in their own traditions. To cut roots, hate was necessary.

So you say:
1. "Tribals" were never Hindu
2. Hindus oppressed you
3. "Hinduism" is for Brahmins
Read 10 tweets
6 Feb
Brahmin-hate was created by colonizers because they saw them as obstacles to conversion of Hindus.

I'm not a (jaati) Brahmin, but I oppose their demonization.

Paraphrasing a meme:
"They're not after Brahmins, they're after Hindus. Brahmins were just in the way."
Hindu society was organized so that everyone thought they were "on top." It was a heterarchy not hierarchy. Brahmins assented to this colonial meme because *like everyone else* they also think they were "on top." So they went with the colonial narrative.

Read 5 tweets
4 Feb
Farmers in US & Canada have the right to sell anywhere. Indian farmers didn’t have this right before the new laws empowered them.

I hope #WorldSupportsIndianFarmers means it supports the new laws and freedom from State control which their farmers enjoy.

#IndiaRejectsPropaganda
Every day a new "explanation" is spun up to oppose the laws. Just plain spin and bs'ing.

Fact is that the laws are being opposed for a singular reason. To oppose the government, to agitate and to burn the country down.

What about the vast majority of farmers who are happy with the laws and not protesting? You want a few anarchists to hold them to ransom? Elections are the way to decide if people and farmers support the laws.

Read 7 tweets
2 Feb
Marco Polo's observation about India. From Venice, he travelled extensively in the Middle East and China. Of course, take accounts with a grain of salt.

But of India, likely Tanjore, "it is the richest and most splendid province in the world." This from the Court of Kublai Khan.
Also observed by other ancient travellers. That people in India do not drink alcohol. Another traveller (I forget which) said that this is considered "low" because it causes loss of awareness. At the same time sexual pleasure is not "sinful." (Sex as sin comes from Christianity).
This quote that led me to the book—in India dark skin is a sign of beauty. "God and saints are black, devils are all white."

He is using a Christian lens, but this is certainly true as deities go. Vishnu, Rama. Krishna, are all dark. White-preference happens after colonialism.
Read 6 tweets
2 Feb
Good thread. We must understand the motivations of Europeans in spinning “Greek” origins.

The Church was in a war for supremacy with Islam in the Middle East. And Europe.

The advent of Christianity and its destruction of pagan knowledge had led Europe into the Dark Ages. 1/
The persecution of Greek philosophers by Christians led to them fleeing to the Middle East. From the 8th to 14th c there was a flourishing of knowledge in Baghdad under the Abbasid Caliphate, building on pagan knowledge.

(Ref: Greek destruction here)

indiafacts.org/dahi-handi-deb…
As @MeruPrastara documents, the flourishing of knowledge during this period had little to do with Islam per se but was a continuation of earlier pagan knowledge built up by the Arab & Persians, from Greek sources and knowledge from India and China. 2/

Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!