Spengler emphasized the conflict between the English and German worldviews, the final showdown between Capitalism and "Prussian Socialism" - of course he thought latter would win
Had an interesting take on Marxism: "capitalism for the working man" -- an Anglo Trojan Horse
But Marxism became the outward philosophy of Socialism everywhere in the 20th cent.,
And while the "Prussian Socialist" model of the managerial state came to be adopted everywhere, either nominally Capitalist or Socialist,
Ideal of "ethical Socialism" did not appear anywhere
Perhaps it was not foreseen how useful the "Prussian" model would be to the Anglo world in managing the ongoing crises of their own economic system, and also underestimated was the corrosive effect on ethics that the two World Wars would have on the West as a whole
The Anglo-American system found the German managerial model very useful in limiting the extreme volatility of their own system
Though crash of 1929 comes to mind, there were predecessors (e.g. panic of 1907 when the market was only saved by a timely loan from JP Morgan himself)
America has always had trouble choosing between the Anglo and German mindsets anyway, since the early 19th century, for obvious ethnic reasons, as well as others (diplomatic, ties between Elites, etc). And its dev. in 19th cent. paralleled the German, but hesitantly
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Spengler very "content dense" writer of the 20th cent. hence the continued interest even after his "academic unpersoning for crimethink"
One controversial claim was Spain, England, Germany as major movers of West via world historical ideas (Ultramontanism, Capitalism, Socialism)
Part of a Gothic / Nordicist / Germanicist take on history as he felt the Med had been overplayed, and wanted to be a contrarian toward his obvious influence Nietzsche
But does this one hold up?
1/ Scandinavia, basically invented Unitarian Church-State - is important no?
...
2/ the Franks, no impact here? Really? Everything from feudal warlordism, to proto-Soviet peasant communism, to much of the high cultural output of north-of-the-Alps Europe? Sheeiit.
3/ the Italians, both parochial communalists and progenitors of high culture others copied
My reason for bringing up the American economy and Soviet comparison
Is that T r v m p years got me thinking: Zogfuehrer was only a modest reformer at best; did only a fraction of the things needed to save the failing Union (his own commitments in part prevented it)
And yet...
Even this small reform was deemed unacceptable to the Establishment and in need of immediate reversal
Instantly I start to think of Gorbachev - his reforms, meaning to open the system, led instead to its collapse
Elites here I think fear a similar breakdown with *any* reforms
I guess that is always the peril with an ossified gerontocracy, even letting the reigns slip a bit could be catastrophic
And America began its walk toward a totalitarian closed society so long ago, they're so near the final victory, they cannot risk letting it all smash now
1/ It's in a dire condition since 2008, and though it's technically still a market economy, it has increasingly taken on the character of a Soviet-style, centrally planned, command economy
If you mentioned this even 2 years ago, obvious objection ...
...Would be "muh bread lines - we haven't got them yet - surely we have not reached such a condition"
But since 2020 we also have those. It's proven that in panic situations we are already facing the proverbial "wartime shortages in Oceania"
2/ System remains on life support..
...Just after the 2008 crash, none other than George Soros himself said publicly that "capital is on life support from here on out" (paraphrasing)
*To this day*, it is kept on life support via an additional $120 billion / month of QE
It's not unprecedented to see a situation like America
Going from a very high point (as our mid-20C position) to a point of degradation and penury (you are here) in under a century
Good comparison is post-Suleiman the Magnificent Ottoman Empire imo ...
Why? I compared America to Oriental-style state years ago. Yankee Unitarian is not terribly far from Islam at this point and continues to converge
But that other case had similar high cultural glory followed by quick fall and incompetent leadership culminating in disaster
The similarities don't end there. The Ottoman system was as mercenary as the American. It's civil bureaucracy and military, many were Europeans. It even had a small and very rich "middleman minority" of financiers, diplomats etc - the Phanariot Greeks, who with time ...
I've written how the characteristic "Faustian dynamism" of the latter-day West came to a head in Postmodern America
Something profoundly alienating in the way that the cities morph into new entities every generation or less
No stability or permanence precludes memory, tradition
I can go to a place I knew well - 15 years ago it was an exurb with but few settlements and there were still farms there, etc
Now it is a buzzing hive of rootless humanity most or all of whom will never be known to you
In less than 1/6 of a century this huge change occurred
To the extent that it's a settlement/colony this has always been the case here, excessive mutability
This is part of the inspiration for Lynchian Surrealism (the other being the essentially American or Animistic spirit of this land as opposed to the Homeland of the West, Europa)
Even from the Plantation Days, America was described as a "demon-haunted land"
So it's origination of "dark fiction" genre from Irving, Poe -> Lovecraft, Howard (-> LaFond) unsurprising, in keeping with the brutal urban life and savage frontiers
Land and populace contributed...
The combination of breakaway bourgeois, aristo, servile and rebellious/runaway types
The Red Indian indigenous influences, the Tropical African imports, the reversion to semi-Barbarism of some of the whites that came over
The Spenglerian "racial pseudomorphosis" of the land
Another feature that stands out is the high number of Utopian communal experiments that would have faced persecution in Europe, and yet despite free practice very few of these things ever made any lasting impact but rather were dissolved into the bizarre amalgamation