We're all bemoaning the celebrity Christian culture that led to the Ravi Zacharias & Carl Lentz (& so many more) sex & sexual abuse scandals.

But what if the problem is not just--or even mostly--celebrity culture?

What if it's the evangelical view of sex?

A thread.
Yes, celebrity culture gave these men (and so many others) more access to victims, and it gave them cover for what they were doing.

But it was not celebrity culture that taught these men to objectify women. Our evangelical culture did that all on its own.
Take the Every Man's Battle series of books: Every Heart Restored says: "Because of male hardwiring, men don't naturally have that Christian view of sex."

EMB says: "We find another reason for the prevalence of sexual sin among men. We got there naturally--simply by being male."
Got that? Men naturally sin sexually.

God-given male sexuality and objectification of women are seen as one & the same. Our evangelical books tell men: God made you to objectify women & see sex as only physical. Your sexual sin nature is innately given. You can't help it.
Tim LaHaye, in the Act of Marriage, echoes this: "Women must cultivate the problem of visual lust, whereas men almost universally must cope with the problem just because they are men."

So if men can't help it, what is the solution?

Women! It is women who keep men from sinning.
EMB says of lust: "Once he tells you he's going cold turkey, be like a merciful vial of methadone for him."

In Sheet Music, Kevin Leman tells women to give husbands oral sex or hand jobs during their periods or postpartum phase, because these are difficult times FOR HIM.
A husband can't be expected to withstand temptation by himself while she's cramping, bleeding, or recovering from birthing his child.

Leman also says: "Either you will have a love affair with your husband or somebody else will."
Emerson Eggerichs, in Love & Respect, says: "The cold, hard truth is that men are often lured into affairs because they are sexually deprived at home.”

And if women get upset by this? We need to realize that men have needs we will never understand.
Love & Respect says, "If your husband is typical, he has a need you don't have."

Power of a Praying Wife, after explaining how women need affection, says: "But for a husband, sex is pure need. His eyes, ears, brain and emotions get clouded if he doesn't have that release."
For Women Only tells women "to accept the struggle" he has with lust. Love & Respect says: "If your husband feels you do not respect his struggle...& his maleness, he’ll pull back."

We need to accept men's lustful nature, or we will disrespect them & they will have affairs.
That's typical of evangelical resources: Men NEED sex in a way women don't. They tell women: You have no right to say no. Do not deprive him. Intended for Pleasure says "The only activity that is to break regular sexual relations is prayer and fasting for some specific cause."
And when women don't put out? Men naturally become predators.

The Act of Marriage describes a husband who raped his wife while she was "kicking and screaming" on their wedding night as "equally unhappy" as his rape victim, because she had never embraced sex in their marriage
His Needs, Her Needs says, "He is pawing and grabbing because he needs something--very badly. Many men tell me they wish their sex drive weren't so strong. As one thirty-two-year-old executive put it, "I feel like a fool--like I'm begging her or even raping her."
Church, when scandals like this happen, we need to stop being surprised. These men are acting out EXACTLY what our evangelical resources have told us--men need physical release; they can't control themselves without women's help; if they don't get help, they'l become predators.
This isn't how the Bible defines sex. In Scripture, sex isn't just physical. It is intimate. It is mutual. It is pleasurable for both. It is not just about a man's "physical release", no matter what Love & Respect may say.

It's a beautiful picture of MUTUAL intimacy & passion.
And until we start talking about a true biblical sexual ethic, we will continue to have these scandals on the front pages of our magazines--because they're only reflecting what's already happening in our bedrooms.
After surveying 20,000 predominantly Christian women, we know what evangelical messages mess sex up for women--and how to give healthier ones. Check out The Great Sex Rescue--and let's change the evangelical conversation about sex.

tolovehonorandvacuum.com/great-sex-resc…

#greatsexrescue
Since this is going big—I’m happy to go on podcasts to talk about this! :)
Oh, and one more ask: PLEASE follow me on Instagram! I’m @sheilagregoire there too. I’d love to get up to 10,000 followers! Makes it easier to share links. thank you!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sheila Gregoire--She Deserves Better is here!

Sheila Gregoire--She Deserves Better is here! Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sheilagregoire

Jul 10
What would happen if we all just stopped?

That question at the end of @bethallisonbarr 's book The Making of Biblical Womanhood is sticking with me today, because I am so absolutely and thoroughly DISGUSTED with the latest Matt Chandler news.
Here's a man who leads a megachurch and a church networking/planting organization, who thinks he can tell us how to live--and his church hired his father, who is a self-confessed child sexual abuser, and didn't tell the congregation.
How much more of this are women supposed to take? How much more evidence of the fact that men high up in the evangelical world JUST. DO. NOT. CARE?
Read 8 tweets
Jul 8
Christian book publishing rant:

I just saw that a big male sporting celebrity's wife, who has a large social media following, has a book coming out.

Can we talk about this? 🧵
A large platform that is based on celebrity can get someone a book contract, even if they have very little life experience; no relevant education; and no independent research and no innovative philanthropic initiatives.
Now, I'm not saying that every celebrity's self-help/inspirational book is bad. But does the world need more?

The world has an abundance of books saying, "you are enough, you are great, God loves you, be thankful."
Read 10 tweets
Jun 26
The megachurch pastors who have been caught and lost their positions--were they really EVER "strong men of God"?

I'm seeing people on social media saying that the devil targets strong men of God. I don't think that's what's going on.
It seems clear that these pastors have had issues for a long, long time. Robert Morris criminally sexually assaulted a child thirty-five years ago. He was NEVER a strong man of God.

He was an extremely charismatic, eloquent speaker.
It's not that the devil targets saintly men in positions of power and corrupts them. It's that many corrupt men end up in Christian positions of power, because our institutions revolve around personality and charisma, not character.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 14
Before approaching a woman about what she's wear, ask yourself:

If men are being made uncomfortable, why is it necessary to transfer that discomfort and shame onto a woman? Why not ask the men to deal with their discomfort?
Several women messaging me have explained, “she’s really well-endowed, and that’s distracting to the men around her.” But a woman cannot do anything about being well-endowed. The issue can never, ever be about how her body is affecting the men around her; that’s on them.
If you feel like you should talk to a woman about her clothing, ask yourself, “am I feeling jealous about her body type? Am I feeling insecure about my own appearance? Am I feeling insecure about what my husband or son may do?”

In those cases, those are YOU issues not HER issues
Read 5 tweets
May 10
Why do people cheat? New research says it has nothing to do with frequency of sex!

a 🧵
This new research about cheating was recently published online, and it is fascinating.

(and has been incorporated into our upcoming book on marriage!)

Here’s what it says:
"Neither the quality nor the frequency at which couples have sex serve as a deterrent for infidelity. ..It is evident that the decision to be unfaithful is solely an individualistic quality in which zero culpability should be directed toward one’s partner"
tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
Read 13 tweets
May 3
Why do evangelical male authors/pastors so often teach that women need to have more sex to prevent affairs--even when new research shows that's not remotely true?

I have a theory--and it's a controversial one.

A 🧵
Authors and pastors teach this because fundamentally they likely aren’t emotionally healthy themselves, or they live in communities where emotional health is relatively rare, and so they don’t understand it.
They carry a lot of shame, so intimacy, vulnerability, and authenticity–the key ingredients for emotional connection–are too difficult. Thus, sex allows them to feel connected without having to do the work of connection.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(