We're all bemoaning the celebrity Christian culture that led to the Ravi Zacharias & Carl Lentz (& so many more) sex & sexual abuse scandals.
But what if the problem is not just--or even mostly--celebrity culture?
What if it's the evangelical view of sex?
A thread.
Yes, celebrity culture gave these men (and so many others) more access to victims, and it gave them cover for what they were doing.
But it was not celebrity culture that taught these men to objectify women. Our evangelical culture did that all on its own.
Take the Every Man's Battle series of books: Every Heart Restored says: "Because of male hardwiring, men don't naturally have that Christian view of sex."
EMB says: "We find another reason for the prevalence of sexual sin among men. We got there naturally--simply by being male."
Got that? Men naturally sin sexually.
God-given male sexuality and objectification of women are seen as one & the same. Our evangelical books tell men: God made you to objectify women & see sex as only physical. Your sexual sin nature is innately given. You can't help it.
Tim LaHaye, in the Act of Marriage, echoes this: "Women must cultivate the problem of visual lust, whereas men almost universally must cope with the problem just because they are men."
So if men can't help it, what is the solution?
Women! It is women who keep men from sinning.
EMB says of lust: "Once he tells you he's going cold turkey, be like a merciful vial of methadone for him."
In Sheet Music, Kevin Leman tells women to give husbands oral sex or hand jobs during their periods or postpartum phase, because these are difficult times FOR HIM.
A husband can't be expected to withstand temptation by himself while she's cramping, bleeding, or recovering from birthing his child.
Leman also says: "Either you will have a love affair with your husband or somebody else will."
Emerson Eggerichs, in Love & Respect, says: "The cold, hard truth is that men are often lured into affairs because they are sexually deprived at home.”
And if women get upset by this? We need to realize that men have needs we will never understand.
Love & Respect says, "If your husband is typical, he has a need you don't have."
Power of a Praying Wife, after explaining how women need affection, says: "But for a husband, sex is pure need. His eyes, ears, brain and emotions get clouded if he doesn't have that release."
For Women Only tells women "to accept the struggle" he has with lust. Love & Respect says: "If your husband feels you do not respect his struggle...& his maleness, he’ll pull back."
We need to accept men's lustful nature, or we will disrespect them & they will have affairs.
That's typical of evangelical resources: Men NEED sex in a way women don't. They tell women: You have no right to say no. Do not deprive him. Intended for Pleasure says "The only activity that is to break regular sexual relations is prayer and fasting for some specific cause."
And when women don't put out? Men naturally become predators.
The Act of Marriage describes a husband who raped his wife while she was "kicking and screaming" on their wedding night as "equally unhappy" as his rape victim, because she had never embraced sex in their marriage
His Needs, Her Needs says, "He is pawing and grabbing because he needs something--very badly. Many men tell me they wish their sex drive weren't so strong. As one thirty-two-year-old executive put it, "I feel like a fool--like I'm begging her or even raping her."
Church, when scandals like this happen, we need to stop being surprised. These men are acting out EXACTLY what our evangelical resources have told us--men need physical release; they can't control themselves without women's help; if they don't get help, they'l become predators.
This isn't how the Bible defines sex. In Scripture, sex isn't just physical. It is intimate. It is mutual. It is pleasurable for both. It is not just about a man's "physical release", no matter what Love & Respect may say.
It's a beautiful picture of MUTUAL intimacy & passion.
And until we start talking about a true biblical sexual ethic, we will continue to have these scandals on the front pages of our magazines--because they're only reflecting what's already happening in our bedrooms.
After surveying 20,000 predominantly Christian women, we know what evangelical messages mess sex up for women--and how to give healthier ones. Check out The Great Sex Rescue--and let's change the evangelical conversation about sex.
Since this is going big—I’m happy to go on podcasts to talk about this! :)
Oh, and one more ask: PLEASE follow me on Instagram! I’m @sheilagregoire there too. I’d love to get up to 10,000 followers! Makes it easier to share links. thank you!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What if you leave a super fundamentalist church for what you think is a safe one--and then discover it's not safe either?
A 🧵
This morning I received an email from a woman who had left an IFB church because it was far too legalistic, and gave a very distorted picture of God. Her family was suffering, and they wanted something better.
They moved to a new town, and some friends recommended the local SBC church. She and her husband went, enjoyed the service, and talked to the pastor.
The pastor agreed with their critiques of IFB fundamentalism, and assured them that their church was safe.
I do believe "not all men." But I also believe "way too many men."
Thinking about the intersection of the horrendous French case involving Gisele Pelicot, and Steve Arterburn, evangelical author, declaring loudly that "men just don't have that Christian view of sex."
A 🧵
In Every Man's Battle, Arterburn & Stoeker say that men sin naturally, "simply by being male."
In another book in the series, a woman wails that she feels like a "human toilet for semen." They don't sympathize, but tell her to understand what her husband is like--& satisfy him.
After reviewing so many evangelical sex & marriage books for our book The Great Sex Rescue, I often feel like I need to take a shower.
Instead, I make a list of all the authors and pastors and speakers I will NEVER be in a room with, simply because of what they admit to.
Here is amazing poem about megachurch pastor Josh Howerton, who jokes about women being essentially sex blow up dolls for their husbands, and about "shady little girls in mini-skirts in church parking lots" being his enemy.
🧵
1/14
But remember--like Josh always says--"it's just a joke!"
Grateful to commenter Julie Chupp who wrote this about Josh:
2/14
HE SAYS GOOD THINGS
He says good things..
Laugh at the funny jokes!
Don't you dare shudder over the crunch of tiny bones and fragile hearts.
In 2019, our ministry took a turn. I read Love & Respect, a hugely successful evangelical marriage book.
I had been blogging & writing about marriage & sex for a decade, but I hadn't read other books for fear of plagiarizing.
I figured, "they love Jesus, I love Jesus; we must all be saying the same thing."
When I read those Love & Respect, I realized that was the farthest thing from the truth.
I read the chapter on sex that told women that "if your husband is typical, he has a need you don't have."
It told them that the husband's need was for physical release (a need she didn't share, apparently). If he didn't get that release he'll come under satanic attack.
You know what I DIDN'T read? Anything about female pleasure. Anything about intimacy.
Dear newlywed women: If you're feeling neglected or unimportant in your marriage, you may decide to push it aside and let it go. If sex is awful, you may think, "well, the main thing is that he's happy."
You can do that for a decade maybe. Then suddenly you can't anymore.
There's something I like to call "The Unfairness Threshold." You can put up with a lot for about a decade or a decade and a half. Then you break. You can't convince yourself everything's okay, or it's not that bad. You're tired.
So it's better, at the beginning of marriage, to speak up about what's bothering you. To make sure that you're prioritized during sex too. To make sure that mental load and housework is split fairly so you each have time off.
Here's the scenario: You know a couple where HE was a youth pastor/youth leader and SHE was a youth group member when they started dating, but they're married now. And they're doing great!
So you wonder: how can we say these types of relationships are wrong? Let me explain.
First, you assume they're doing great because of what you see on the outside. But you don't actually know. The number of memoirs coming out right now of women telling how they were being controlled and nobody knew, is astounding. We only see the outside of a relationship.
Second, let's remember who these women are. Often the youth pastor targets the most mature, responsible over-achiever girl who knows her Bible. What kind of wife will this girl later make? Likely one who can keep everything together & looking great by sheer force of her will.