I make four basic points about racism. 1st, there obviously is mild but REAL racism in the USA...like every human society. Studies find that that 8% of whites wouldn't vote for a qualified Black President (Pew 2016), Blacks are 6-9% less likely to be rented a nice apartment, etc.
(2) But, it can't be ignored that the USA spent an EXTRAORDINARY amount of blood/treasure compensating for racism this century. Brown v. Board dates back to 1954, the Civil Rights Act made discrimination ILLEGAL in '64, and pro-minority affirmative action dates to 1967.
(3) In the context of this actual history, we don't see "oppression" today as much as a complex mix of advantages for whites and POC. A Black or Hispanic student has a 200-300 point SAT advantage (Sander & Taylor 2012) over an equally qualified white kid when applying to college.
(4) More notably, many/most of the gaps attributed to "institutional racism" vanish under competent scrutiny. Blacks make ~82% of what whites do- but the gap closes to basically nothing if you adjust for age, living in the South, SAT score, etc (O'Neill 1990, 2005).
(5) Also, most OTHER core traits seem to affect income and happiness more than race does. The one time I ran a large-N test of a solid quant survey of "privilege," race had the SIXTH highest effect on the DV, after social CLASS, female sex, being gay, urban v. rural status, etc.
(6) In short, racism exists here- as everywhere. But claims of vast "structures" of oppression often collapse when we adjust for anything BUT race - and race is one of 12-15 things correlated with "privilege" or income. Many social justice arguments strike me as just wrong.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Wilfred Reilly

Wilfred Reilly Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wil_da_beast630

11 Feb
Subtle racism DOES exist. When I was in the nightlife business, a life-world ago, clubs paid a promoter friend $5 per head to bring in patrons. NO club - not one: white, Black, Hispanic - would pay for fighting-age males of their non-primary race, and this hit POC the hardest.
(2) The real question is how much impact this sort of thing - which is what probably 90% of good Sociological studies focus on finding - has in the real world, where it is countered by less-often-studied affirmative action, majority non-racism, and MINORITY group preferences.
(3) My take, looking at U.S. group income and education data is: not much. Many/most of the most successful groups in the USA (Indians, E. Asians, Nigerians) are POC, and even W/B gaps largely collapse after basic adjustments for things like age, region, and test scores.
Read 4 tweets
2 Feb
Short thread: my page has a pretty high healthy-banter level, and I often get asked: "Do you write off twitter?"

Yes. I've put out quite a few pieces lately. This is an article for the academically-focused 'Minding the Campus' series, with @NASorg: mindingthecampus.org/2021/01/28/the…
(2) This, for @Quillette, is an empirical analysis of the effect of police pullbacks - and other variables, such as the COVID-19 pandemic itself - on murder/major crime in 2020. quillette.com/2021/01/27/did…
(3) Here, for @amspectator, I "jokingly" compare modern wokeness to traditional religion. Totally original idea, of course! spectator.org/wokeness-relig…
Read 5 tweets
31 Jan
The biggest "conspiracy theory" in the USA today is that there are massively powerful but almost entirely hidden racist forces at work, which explain every single discrepancy in performance between whites and POC, but somehow don't affect Asians or Nigerians at all.
(2) What does explain gaps? Dozens of empiricists (Sowell, O'Neill, Chua, Fryer, etc.) have found that adjusting for cultural/situational variables that differ between groups - mean AGE, region of residence (the South?), basic qualifications like SAT score - closes ~all of them.
(3) This doesn't mean Black or Native (or Appalachian) Americans can't be disadvantaged as re income/schooling by PAST conflict. It DOES mean no "subtle, untrackable" demons will cause a Nigerian Penn Stater with a solid 1300 GRE to have a very different life from a white peer.
Read 5 tweets
7 Jan
A few last thoughts on the pro-Trump riot yesterday. 1st, it was illegal, ridiculous, and must be severely punished. Rioting is generally disgusting, because of the "dark fun" element of destruction for its own sake. Govts should beat rioters in 'battle,' then toss 'em in prison.
(2) That said, it's frankly difficult for me to see this as some "unique evil." In 2020-21, we've seen many places almost as unique/notable damaged FAR worse - active police stations (!), major federal court-houses, my hometown Mag Mile, what's left of where CHAZ was, etc.
(3) I also don't follow the argument that Black protesters would have been treated far worse than right-wingers. "Room to destroy" BLM/Antifa protesters were in fact often almost coddled. On the Trump side, at least 1 woman was shot to death by police, and 4 people in total died.
Read 5 tweets
6 Jan
Gotta say: the claim that right-wing protesters/rioters in DC would all be dead "if they were Black" is....kiiiiiinda contradicted by the entire past summer of giant, 30+% Black, left-wing riots that caused $2B in damage and generally weren't punished at all. #so_theres_that
(2) For anyone arguing the summer rioters picked low-profile targets: they set an active police precinct - the Minneapolis 3rd - on fire with the cops in it. The "national church," St. John's across from the WH, was literally attacked and damaged at one point. The list goes on.
(3) Of course, ALL rioting is bad, and people found to have been actually violent during a riot should ALL be arrested and severely punished...right?
Read 4 tweets
17 Dec 20
Speaking frankly, AS an academic, the reason many smart normal citizens distrust academic 'experts' is that they see entire fields ("____ Studies") as being full primarily of low-IQ radicals. This is......not entirely inaccurate, Sokal 2 being just the latest hard evidence.
(2) I searched this graphic, posted to the thread, and it seems to basically be accurate - although a bit dated, and presumably obtained via some kind of GRE norming. #IQs_by_field

These are GRE scores by field. Good to see POLS holding its own, son! ets.org/s/gre/pdf/gre_…
(3) Worth noting - "critical theory" under art history refers strictly to that in the context of art, the one field where po-mo can be useful. The "Studies" fields are grouped under "Other Social Science," IIRC.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!