43% of progressives and 25% of conservatives say the other side has a fundamentally evil moral foundation.

These poll results really surprised and saddened me and each for different reasons.
I was talking with @freespe4ker and he said many progressives think conservatives have an evil foundation. I didn't assume that was the case. He estimated the number would be around 30%.

I was very wrong.
For progressives, selfish and mean were things I expected to be said about cons. I didn't expect evil, not at that rate.

On the conservative side, I hesitated before posting it, because I thought cons would see progressives as naive or overbearing, I didn't expect evil.
I tweeted this a week ago, and I still mean it to my core. I certainly believe there are some evil moral foundations, and I surely find a lot of beliefs morally abhorrent, but I can't see them as generally true about either conservatives or progressives, much less foundationally.
If there's a point I can make here, it's that I think it's unhealthy to consider the norm among cons/progs to be fundamentally evil. I stand by the idea that people should speak forcefully for and against ideas, call those ideas evil if you're sincere, but we're still neighbors.
I'll end with my own naivete. I love my neighbor regardless of ideology. It takes a lot for me to see a person's ideology as representative of them as people. Let's at least make sure we never let hatred cause us to lose sight of each other's humanity, or our own.
I'm much more comfortable calling certain views immoral or morally abhorrent than I am calling people immoral.

Grr, terrible late night math

It should've been 21/59 = 36%
Instead I had done 21/49 = 43%

Apologies all 😔

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Mansa Keita

Dr. Mansa Keita Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rasmansa

14 Feb
The race science community frequently abuses the fields of biology, genetics and statistics.

I don't like seeing computer science pulled into the fray.
Clustering is so thoroughly misunderstood, and it's hard to see that misunderstanding as not being motivated.

From a math perspective, the misunderstanding of clustering is also ridiculous.

Read 4 tweets
13 Feb
In general, I question the ability to break down complex abilities into a small list of components.

At the same time, I wonder what doing so would look like in terms of chess, and whether it would map to how I see my own level.
One thing chess has relative to some other complex abilities is a very solid system of measurement. At higher levels, chess ratings tend to predict the outcome of a sequence of games very well.

But is it even possible to break that down into smaller measurable abilities?
What makes a Magnus Carlsen dominate a 2500 GM? Another chess master on here broke chess down into 1/3 knowledge and 2/3 ability. As I think about it, I neither agree nor disagree. The rules of chess are simple, but mastery is not, prodigies notwithstanding.
Read 4 tweets
7 Feb
John McWhorter has taken of late to finding ways to feed racist ideas about black people while blaming black people for it.
johnmcwhorter.substack.com/p/the-n-word-a…
See, if black people are offended by white people casually using the n-word, it's because we're not smart.
John surprisingly frames things as if it's his "woke" nemeses exaggerating what black Americans think of the use of the n-word. It's slanderous he says. Unfortunately for him, this question has been surveyed.

Over 70% think it's never acceptable. Facts don't like your lies John.
Read 6 tweets
2 Feb
We need to call a moratorium on performative anti-racism... forever.
Seriously though, the argument doesn't even make sense. The NAACP, UNIA, NOI, SNCC, SCLC, etc are all acronyms from the civil rights era and established by black people.
I wrote an article about performative anti-racism
medium.com/@rasmansa/perf…

Whoever told these people that acronyms are white supremacy should be ashamed.
Read 5 tweets
1 Feb
I refused to think James could go deeper into the anti-Semitism thing, but I accept I was wrong.

This is beyond repulsive.

I think at this point he's actively trying to get banned. I can't even comprehend what he's doing otherwise, and I haven't been a fan of his work or bigotry for years.
So the most charitable read people have come up with here is that James is saying this tweet he's retweeting is proof that woke Jews are causing an increase in anti-Semitism.

I'll let you draw your own conclusions.
Read 4 tweets
9 Jan
Bo: "in academia it's indisputably the case that people of color are given advantages over white people...the who is the least likely to get a job all other things being equal is a white male"

Academia: 40% white males, 27% white women, 4% black, and less than 4% Hispanic.
Before someone says there aren't enough black academics with PhDs.

6.5% of PhD recipients are black and 7% Hispanic.
Yet these groups are max 4% each of full-time academic faculty.
The idea that black and Hispanic people have advantages getting faculty positions in academia, or have "minority privilege" in academia is completely divorced from the reality of academia.

If people want to make the argument that black people with PhDs aren't qualified, well...
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!