Irregular warfare has and continues to be a feature of modern conflict.

Should Ireland have an Irregular Reserve as part of an Irish Resistance Operating Concept?

It's not as dramatic as it sounds.

At <0.3% GDP spent on Defence, Ireland can't afford to build a mass of professional part time combat arm Reservists.

The current model of relying on individuals to be professional military standard volunteers has failed.

So if armed volunteers is the policy, how can it work?
Conscription or National Service in Ireland?

Given the discourse around EU Armies, I sincerely doubt that either be acceptable to the public without some existential driver behind it.

Conscription is typically viewed through a 20th century lens.
We could professionalise the existing RDF.

I pitched this to the DoD in 2014 as part of my White Paper submission.

It would require a whole of Govt effort and a lot of funding.

But this is unlikely as resources will be more focused on PDF retention and capital projects
There is the White Paper policy position of establishing a Specialist Reserve, maintaining the RDF as it is.

This would likely see a small number of part time specialists engaged and utilised at the expense of the RDF declining into non-existence.

We would have no real Reserve.
Then there's the idea that we roll specialists up into combat support and combat service support roles. Have the RDF focus exclusively on delivering CS and CSS and build a new class of Combat Arm Reserve that is more conducive to its training inputs.

An Irregular Reserve.
RDF & PDF infantry will never be considered equal. So why invest in the charade of Reserve combat units?

If all we need the Reserve combat units for is resistance to armed aggression against the State, then why not focus their training on where they'll be most effective?
This isn't a new idea.

Other countries have these volunteer resistance/guerrilla forces that train for resisting occupation.

The problem we have is that Ireland has expected a professional level of service from volunteer Reservists.

Its not scalable.

nytimes.com/2016/11/01/wor…
An Irregular Reserve that is established by county would allow for groups and capabilities to form where they exist, rather than having a rigid structure where units and locations that aren't accessible to willing volunteers.

Volunteers can train where it is more suitable.
Most training doesn't need to be armed. That component can be managed by a PDF cadre.

First Aid, Land Navigation, Command Tasks, Communications etc can all be taught through open source or unrestricted material.

Training would be assessed through competitions.
Annual patrol competitions can be held.

Cells would compete by completing tasks along a route. Such as managing a road traffic accident, recovering equipment from a cache, military vehicle recognition, perform a reconnaissance task, execute an ambush etc

Who wouldnt enjoy that?
Enjoyment is a key factor here.

Ireland isn't facing an existential threat, so the driver towards retaining people in the Irregular Reserve must be enjoyment, and engagement.

Service should feel more like a sporting endeavour. Representing your county, competing against others.
Cells can also if they so wish train to deliver auxiliary support, as there's more to irregular warfare than paramilitary guerrillas.

Cyber experts, medical professionals, logisticians, motorcyclists, community workers all have something to bring the Defence party. Bring it on.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Robert Gilbey

Robert Gilbey Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RobGilbey

17 Dec 20
Thread:

"With regard to the RDF, the Commission will consider a wide range of options and will make recommendations to better leverage the capabilities of the RDF in their supports to the PDF and to make service in the RDF a more attractive option."

Let's unpack that.....
Thankfully, the "Abolition of the Reserve" wasn't considered an option in the Terms of Reference as it was in the DoD's 2012 "Value for Money" Review of the RDF.

I would link the source, but the DoD have opted not to host it despite it informing the 2015 White Paper Policy.
The 2012 Steering Committee comprised of Civil & Military (but not a single Reservist) personnel saw no role for the Reserve as the "PDF could meet all day-to-day tasks".

8 years on, & DF capability is limited due to a crippling retention crisis as a result of DoD mismanagement.
Read 30 tweets
26 Nov 20
This is a significant step forward for @dfreserve

"The decision to join or stay in the Reserve should be informed by a more ambitious approach to its role" -@simoncoveney responding to @davidstantontd

Special thanks to @BerryCathal for his proposals for Defence Act amendments
@simoncoveney - "I will be encouraging [The Commission on Defence] to be ambitious & if necessary, quite radical to reflect the future defence & security challenges"

"I think we're in a good space here"

@BerryCathal "What the Minister has proposed has exceeded my expectations"
Solid foundations are being laid for what might well be a very progressive set of recommendations by the Commission on Defence.
Read 11 tweets
1 Nov 20
Thread

The Commission on Defence, Terms of Reference.

We need a force structure that is capable of managing the domains of responsibility that we have. That means listening to military expertise that is driven by a desire for capability, over civil advice that is driven by cost
We must review the fact that 79% of our military is only capable of operating on 9% of the territory that we are responsible for defending.

That's before we get into questions over why we have 9 ships, with only an establishment for 7 crews & only strength for ~5 crews.
Defence is a collective responsibility. So the Irish approach needs not only to be whole of Government, but whole of society.

We want to be a good European & Global actor, therefore we must have the hard conversations about contributing & benefitting from defence investment.
Read 10 tweets
21 Oct 20
Cyber Reserve....
Specialist Reserve....

None of this matters if the framework upon which it is built is insufficient for purpose.

Let's unpack what is currently on offer for aspiring Reservists who meet the criteria of "specialist".
1. You have the skills Defence needs and you want to contribute.

Let's say you are a forensic data analyst with Arabic language skills, working for a multinational.

Straight off the bat, there is not an Intelligence Corps for you to join, but you're sort of a techie, so... CIS.
2. You wait for a recruitment window.

You apply.

You wait.

You are given dates for fitness testing.

You wait.

You pass fitness and go on for medical screening.

You wait.

You pass medical and are processed for security clearance.

You wait.

You're cleared to be attested...
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!