At <0.3% GDP spent on Defence, Ireland can't afford to build a mass of professional part time combat arm Reservists.
The current model of relying on individuals to be professional military standard volunteers has failed.
So if armed volunteers is the policy, how can it work?
Conscription or National Service in Ireland?
Given the discourse around EU Armies, I sincerely doubt that either be acceptable to the public without some existential driver behind it.
Conscription is typically viewed through a 20th century lens.
We could professionalise the existing RDF.
I pitched this to the DoD in 2014 as part of my White Paper submission.
It would require a whole of Govt effort and a lot of funding.
But this is unlikely as resources will be more focused on PDF retention and capital projects
There is the White Paper policy position of establishing a Specialist Reserve, maintaining the RDF as it is.
This would likely see a small number of part time specialists engaged and utilised at the expense of the RDF declining into non-existence.
We would have no real Reserve.
Then there's the idea that we roll specialists up into combat support and combat service support roles. Have the RDF focus exclusively on delivering CS and CSS and build a new class of Combat Arm Reserve that is more conducive to its training inputs.
An Irregular Reserve.
RDF & PDF infantry will never be considered equal. So why invest in the charade of Reserve combat units?
If all we need the Reserve combat units for is resistance to armed aggression against the State, then why not focus their training on where they'll be most effective?
This isn't a new idea.
Other countries have these volunteer resistance/guerrilla forces that train for resisting occupation.
The problem we have is that Ireland has expected a professional level of service from volunteer Reservists.
An Irregular Reserve that is established by county would allow for groups and capabilities to form where they exist, rather than having a rigid structure where units and locations that aren't accessible to willing volunteers.
Volunteers can train where it is more suitable.
Most training doesn't need to be armed. That component can be managed by a PDF cadre.
First Aid, Land Navigation, Command Tasks, Communications etc can all be taught through open source or unrestricted material.
Training would be assessed through competitions.
Annual patrol competitions can be held.
Cells would compete by completing tasks along a route. Such as managing a road traffic accident, recovering equipment from a cache, military vehicle recognition, perform a reconnaissance task, execute an ambush etc
Who wouldnt enjoy that?
Enjoyment is a key factor here.
Ireland isn't facing an existential threat, so the driver towards retaining people in the Irregular Reserve must be enjoyment, and engagement.
Service should feel more like a sporting endeavour. Representing your county, competing against others.
Cells can also if they so wish train to deliver auxiliary support, as there's more to irregular warfare than paramilitary guerrillas.
Cyber experts, medical professionals, logisticians, motorcyclists, community workers all have something to bring the Defence party. Bring it on.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"With regard to the RDF, the Commission will consider a wide range of options and will make recommendations to better leverage the capabilities of the RDF in their supports to the PDF and to make service in the RDF a more attractive option."
Thankfully, the "Abolition of the Reserve" wasn't considered an option in the Terms of Reference as it was in the DoD's 2012 "Value for Money" Review of the RDF.
I would link the source, but the DoD have opted not to host it despite it informing the 2015 White Paper Policy.
The 2012 Steering Committee comprised of Civil & Military (but not a single Reservist) personnel saw no role for the Reserve as the "PDF could meet all day-to-day tasks".
8 years on, & DF capability is limited due to a crippling retention crisis as a result of DoD mismanagement.
@simoncoveney - "I will be encouraging [The Commission on Defence] to be ambitious & if necessary, quite radical to reflect the future defence & security challenges"
"I think we're in a good space here"
@BerryCathal "What the Minister has proposed has exceeded my expectations"
Solid foundations are being laid for what might well be a very progressive set of recommendations by the Commission on Defence.
We need a force structure that is capable of managing the domains of responsibility that we have. That means listening to military expertise that is driven by a desire for capability, over civil advice that is driven by cost