Mangy Jay Profile picture
14 Feb, 11 tweets, 2 min read
I don't think that "Democrats were cowards and couldn't stand up to McConnell" is the correct framing. Dems clearly made a political calculation. Plenty to potentially criticize about that calculation, but it was informed by factors unrelated to generalized "fear of republicans"
What we largely know now:
-There would never have been enough GOP votes to convict
-GOP had the power to hold up *all* Senate business & that means COVID relief (Dems would have been blamed for this hold up)
-Witnesses were uncooperative & would have had to have been subpoenaed
So I think the correct framing is that Democrats made a political calculation that the benefit of adding witnesses (who would not change the outcome) was not worth the political & moral cost of holding up COVID relief, as well as important confirmations. . . .
This calculation can be criticized on its own merits, but it's categorically different than just being scared of McConnell & the GOP.
For my own part, I think an error Democrats made w/r/t witnesses was not calling cooperative police officers who had been attacked that day. Just a few personal narratives from the police would have deeply embarrassed the GOP. That's a missed opportunity, in my view.
But is even that missed opportunity worth both the short term and long term costs of holding up COVID relief? Costs that have implications for millions of Americans, as well as Democrats' success in the midterms? That's a more complicated question w/ less clear answers.
Overall, I understand why some are angry w/ Dems. I think it's good that we are all willing to criticize our own side. However, I also think it will be unfortunate if we let the extent of this criticism obscure the real villainy here: the GOP's craven disregard for our democracy
I think this dynamic--Dems willingness to hold other Dems accountable, paired w/ the GOP's refusal to do any such thing--has somewhat shaped the nature of the W.Bush presidency & the Iraq War in our public discourse & consciousness. It would be a shame if this happened w/ Trump.
The media, of course, has also played a part here. And, again, I think it's *good* that we hold our own side accountable &, in the case of Iraq, I think it's commendable we have not let any Senators wave away their 2002 AUMF votes.
That said, the justifiable accountability applied to Dems is striking in contrast to the absolute lack of accountability applied to the GOP, given the war was *their* project in the 1st place.
We have to be willing to forcefully criticize our own party. But we also have to be cautious about balancing this criticism, such that the actions of the GOP are not minimized in public memory.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mangy Jay

Mangy Jay Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @magi_jay

14 Feb
A central tension in our politics is this we have 1 political party that cares about upholding democracy, whereas the other party's aims can only be achieved thru undermining democracy. This is coupled w/ the fact that 1 party cares about people's well-being & the other does not
These 2 facts lead to a situation in which, in order to both uphold democracy & advance well-being, 1 party is dedicated to a functional gov't & the other party is well-served by a dysfunctional government. Such dysfunction is both instrumental & ideological (anti-government)
And then, of course, we have gerrymandering + a cap on the House of reps, 2 Senators per state, & the electoral college. A set of circumstances that gives massively disproportionate power to the anti-democracy & anti-well-being party.
Read 9 tweets
13 Feb
I have the impression that many feel, as I often do, that our only justice will come with truth. Not with votes to convict, but with a documented record & historical accountability. If we feel this way, we should lobby Congress for a 9/11-style committee/commission
I'm not going to argue for/against Senate Dems decisions today. My own views are complex & shift from moment to moment. But I will say this: it is possible to still fight for truth. And it is also possible that an impeachment trial may not be the best venue if truth is our goal.
So, regardless of whether or not you agree with Senate Democrats, disagree with them, or are conflicted, if what you want is *truth*--if that's where you identify our primary potential to actually achieve justice--we can still advocate for that.
Read 5 tweets
13 Feb
I'm not against calling witnesses, per se, but I also don't see how it will change anything--especially GOP votes. If we could get McCarthy to actually tell the truth on the record & in public, that would be independently worth it. But I suspect he'll just claim amnesia or lie
I'm personally moved by this position. I don't believe McCarthy & other GOPers will tell the truth. I think they'll lie and/or evade. The makes it such that--narratively speaking--the trial could end on a rhetorical flat note. I'm not sure we want that

I'm open to hearing pro-witness arguments, but I don't think you should give McCarthy and others too much credit when you mount your case. It will be an endless loop of "I do not recall," etc.
Read 4 tweets
12 Feb
Multiple things can be true:
-Politico is not great
-They shouldn't have been researching Ducklo's personal life
-Ducklo had a right to be pissed
-Ducklo's reaction was still bad
-The reaction to this story from some in the press is hypocritical given the pass they gave to Trump
If Ducklo, in response to the reporter, had just said, "Fuck you, you jerks," I would say that was bad, but I could understand some leeway in the context. He didn't have to take it to the level of commenting on the reporter's sexual appeal or threatening to destroy her career.
That said, people who are responding to the story by saying it's so much worse than Trump should talk to one of the Black female reporters who Trump verbally harassed or to the Asian reporters who were subjected to talk of the "Kung Flu."
Read 7 tweets
12 Feb
This framing is terrible. Ducklo was trying to quash a story about his personal life. This isn't the same as aggressive pushback from the Biden administration about a story involving the administration. That said, Ducklo's behavior is atrocious & he should be fired.
There's an important distinction between "Outside of work, administration employee pressures reporter to suppress story about his personal life" and "Dep Press secretary pressures reporter to suppress story about the Biden admin." Both are bad, but they're categorically different
I don't know why people keep telling me that Ducklo's behavior was bad and he should be fired when I literally said his behavior was bad and he should be fired. I'm just saying his behavior is not reflective of a Biden admin attack on the free press. It's bad personal behavior.
Read 5 tweets
12 Feb
When we're talking about speech, government action vs. private action is a pretty big distinction.
There were some individuals in Hollywood that were independently anti-communist (Walt Disney; Ronald Reagan), but the Blacklist itself & the larger systemic actions of Hollywood were directly influenced by the House Un-American Activities Committee.
You could still make an argument that Carano shouldn't have been fired, but it's quite clearly a different case than the Blacklist. Carano was fired b/c a company thought she was bad for their brand. That's not the same as companies being pressured & threatened by the government
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!