Mangy Jay Profile picture
14 Feb, 9 tweets, 2 min read
A central tension in our politics is this we have 1 political party that cares about upholding democracy, whereas the other party's aims can only be achieved thru undermining democracy. This is coupled w/ the fact that 1 party cares about people's well-being & the other does not
These 2 facts lead to a situation in which, in order to both uphold democracy & advance well-being, 1 party is dedicated to a functional gov't & the other party is well-served by a dysfunctional government. Such dysfunction is both instrumental & ideological (anti-government)
And then, of course, we have gerrymandering + a cap on the House of reps, 2 Senators per state, & the electoral college. A set of circumstances that gives massively disproportionate power to the anti-democracy & anti-well-being party.
Taken together, the structural issues in our electoral system, deep ideological divides about government/democracy, & the differential investment in advancing citizens' well-being does leave Democrats at a perpetual disadvantage.
A firefighter who is looking at a burning house & trying to decide whether to concentrate on stopping the fire from spreading or to save a child at the expense of a grandmother is facing a fundamentally different set of choices than the person who lit the fire in the first place
In our politics, this is no where more evident than the advantage the GOP has in negotiations over government shutdowns. They shut it down to advance harmful actions (anti-healthcare; anti-immigration) & they don't care about the workers & others who suffer in the meantime.
People who care about functioning government, preventing harmful policies, & the livelihoods of workers are at an extreme disadvantage when faced with such nihilism. What do we sacrifice? What do we give to these immoral goons who desire destruction & don't care about harm?
The answers are not easy, just as most morally-informed choices are not easy. & I don't think the Democrats always make the best decisions. But we need to be clear about these dynamics in order to be informed about the best options available to us in these unequal negotiations.
&, finally, we need to be clear about these tensions in order to shift the dynamics. We must remove the GOP from power & chip away at their disproportionate access to power. That means voting. Constantly. The fight for democracy is a generational project, not a short term one

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mangy Jay

Mangy Jay Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @magi_jay

14 Feb
I don't think that "Democrats were cowards and couldn't stand up to McConnell" is the correct framing. Dems clearly made a political calculation. Plenty to potentially criticize about that calculation, but it was informed by factors unrelated to generalized "fear of republicans"
What we largely know now:
-There would never have been enough GOP votes to convict
-GOP had the power to hold up *all* Senate business & that means COVID relief (Dems would have been blamed for this hold up)
-Witnesses were uncooperative & would have had to have been subpoenaed
So I think the correct framing is that Democrats made a political calculation that the benefit of adding witnesses (who would not change the outcome) was not worth the political & moral cost of holding up COVID relief, as well as important confirmations. . . .
Read 11 tweets
13 Feb
I have the impression that many feel, as I often do, that our only justice will come with truth. Not with votes to convict, but with a documented record & historical accountability. If we feel this way, we should lobby Congress for a 9/11-style committee/commission
I'm not going to argue for/against Senate Dems decisions today. My own views are complex & shift from moment to moment. But I will say this: it is possible to still fight for truth. And it is also possible that an impeachment trial may not be the best venue if truth is our goal.
So, regardless of whether or not you agree with Senate Democrats, disagree with them, or are conflicted, if what you want is *truth*--if that's where you identify our primary potential to actually achieve justice--we can still advocate for that.
Read 5 tweets
13 Feb
I'm not against calling witnesses, per se, but I also don't see how it will change anything--especially GOP votes. If we could get McCarthy to actually tell the truth on the record & in public, that would be independently worth it. But I suspect he'll just claim amnesia or lie
I'm personally moved by this position. I don't believe McCarthy & other GOPers will tell the truth. I think they'll lie and/or evade. The makes it such that--narratively speaking--the trial could end on a rhetorical flat note. I'm not sure we want that

I'm open to hearing pro-witness arguments, but I don't think you should give McCarthy and others too much credit when you mount your case. It will be an endless loop of "I do not recall," etc.
Read 4 tweets
12 Feb
Multiple things can be true:
-Politico is not great
-They shouldn't have been researching Ducklo's personal life
-Ducklo had a right to be pissed
-Ducklo's reaction was still bad
-The reaction to this story from some in the press is hypocritical given the pass they gave to Trump
If Ducklo, in response to the reporter, had just said, "Fuck you, you jerks," I would say that was bad, but I could understand some leeway in the context. He didn't have to take it to the level of commenting on the reporter's sexual appeal or threatening to destroy her career.
That said, people who are responding to the story by saying it's so much worse than Trump should talk to one of the Black female reporters who Trump verbally harassed or to the Asian reporters who were subjected to talk of the "Kung Flu."
Read 7 tweets
12 Feb
This framing is terrible. Ducklo was trying to quash a story about his personal life. This isn't the same as aggressive pushback from the Biden administration about a story involving the administration. That said, Ducklo's behavior is atrocious & he should be fired.
There's an important distinction between "Outside of work, administration employee pressures reporter to suppress story about his personal life" and "Dep Press secretary pressures reporter to suppress story about the Biden admin." Both are bad, but they're categorically different
I don't know why people keep telling me that Ducklo's behavior was bad and he should be fired when I literally said his behavior was bad and he should be fired. I'm just saying his behavior is not reflective of a Biden admin attack on the free press. It's bad personal behavior.
Read 5 tweets
12 Feb
When we're talking about speech, government action vs. private action is a pretty big distinction.
There were some individuals in Hollywood that were independently anti-communist (Walt Disney; Ronald Reagan), but the Blacklist itself & the larger systemic actions of Hollywood were directly influenced by the House Un-American Activities Committee.
You could still make an argument that Carano shouldn't have been fired, but it's quite clearly a different case than the Blacklist. Carano was fired b/c a company thought she was bad for their brand. That's not the same as companies being pressured & threatened by the government
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!