1/4.
Some of the illogical consequences of @RobertJenrick@mhclg 'solutions' to the fire safety scandal: 1) Majority of leaseholders' issues are not cladding related, so not covered by any fund 2) Even buildings eligible for cladding funding have even costlier works not covered
2/4. 3) A 'them and us' division is created between buildings over/under 18m 4) Even where developers are proven to have been professionally negligent they're still not paying for remediation or being compelled to by govt. 'Hoping' they 'do the right thing' isn't enough.
3/4. 5) If just one leaseholder can't pay then work on their building cannot commence, so remediation never happens. 6) This is not a case of not wanting not pay (irrespective of the morality), this is a case of hundreds of thousands of people physically not being able to pay.
4/4. 7) Bankrupting leaseholders on this scale causes catastrophic impact on the economy and is simply untenable 8) Banks, lenders, govt and @RICSnews are not aligned on the practicalities of getting the EWS1 process sorted #EndOurCladdingScandal#EndOurFireSafetyScandal
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh