1) It looks like Pelosi is covering up the reasons why there was insufficient security at the US Capitol on January 6.

Did Pelosi purposely create the stage, as political theater, for the US Capitol Police to be overrun? House GOP leaders are asking questions that need answers.
2) This line of questioning to Pelosi from @RodneyDavis, @Jim_Jordan, @JamesComer & @DevinNunes points to suspicion of a Pelosi coverup. Let's take a look. republicans-cha.house.gov/sites/republic…
3) Why was US Capitol Police Chief Steve Sund DENIED his request for National Guard backup two days before the fact, on January 4?

Keep in mind that the US Capitol Police is under the command of the congressional leadership, not the president.
4) Not asked by the congressmen, but appropriate here: Why did DC Mayor Muriel Bowser refuse the Trump Administration's offer of National Guard and other federal backup on January 5? (Pelosi had just given Bowser unusual House floor privileges.)
5) Did House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving (appointed by the House, immediately in charge of Capitol Police on House side) "get permission or instruction" from Pelosi's staff on January 4 prior to the denial of Chief Sund's request for National Guard backup?
6) Lawmakers to Pelosi: "What conversations and what guidance did you and your staff give the Sergeant at Arms leading up to January 6th specific to the security posture of the campus?"
7) Lawmakers to Pelosi: "What conversations did you have during the attack on the Capitol and what response did you give security officials on January 6th when Chief Sund requested National Guard support that required your approval?"
8) Coverup: Congressmen flat-out ask Pelosi: "Why are your House Officers refusing to comply with preservation and production requests to turn over request materials relevant to the events of January 6th?"
9) Pelosi has refused to answer these basic questions for 5 weeks, the senior congressmen say:

"Five weeks have passed since the January 6th attack on the Capitol building, and many important questions about your responsibility for the security of the Capitol remain unanswered."
10) The buck stops with Pelosi: "The Speaker is responsible for all operational decisions made within the House."

Pelosi has centralized control over the House, so she can't escape personal responsibility, the lawmakers note.
11) Pelosi has allowed no bipartisan and bicameral review of security measures before and during the January 6 attack on the Capitol. Instead, Pelosi fired the sergeant at arms, forced the resignation of the Capitol Police chief, and appointed her own person to lead a review.
12) Pelosi's actions thus had self-serving motivations, and not the interests of the House, the Capitol, or the public:

"These decisions were made in a partisan manner without any consultation ... and therefore raise questions about the political motivations of your decisions."
13) Capitol Police Sund requested National Guard activation "ahead of the January 6th Joint Session of Congress," but the House Sergeant at Arms (SAA) declined, saying it would look bad and that there was no "intelligence" to require added security, the congressmen remind Pelosi.
14) "on January 6th in the middle of the on-going attack of the Capitol, Chief Sund again notified the SAA of his request for approval to authorize the National Guard. It took over an hour for his request to be approved" because the SAA required an OK from Pelosi & her designees.
15) The next day, January 7, Pelosi publicly called for US Capitol Police Chief Sund to resign because he "hasn't called us since this happened."

Sund says that this was not true, and that he briefed Pelosi twice on January 6.
16) Pelosi's refusal to have a bipartisan, bicameral investigation raises suspicions about a coverup. So does her unilateral appointment of a general to lead an investigation. This raises suspicions about Pelosi influencing the findings and conclusions.
17) Pelosi and her deputies have shown "obstruction and inability to procure and preserve information" necessary for independent oversight of the January 6 events.

Requests for information were repeatedly "denied."

Lawmakers tell Pelosi that she is responsible for coverup.
18) The lawmakers tell Pelosi that she has "fabricated" concerns about the US Capitol, and that she has personally violated her own procedures.

My take on this is that Speaker Nancy Pelosi is covering up the reasons for security lapses on January 6. She surely has a reason.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with J Michael Waller

J Michael Waller Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JMichaelWaller

16 Feb
Biden administration wants US troops in Washington DC "at least through fall 2021," DHS email says.

We all know why.
fox5dc.com/news/national-…
DC residents get "no straight answers" - "On Thursday night during a virtual town hall, Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton was asked by DC residents how long the National Guard will stay in DC and how long fencing will stay put, but no straight answers were given from speakers."
DC delegate to Congress says she prefers "state of the art intelligence, not fencing, and National Guard is part of the state of the art intelligence. It’s human beings, not 19th century fencing – the king of fencing we’ve been using for 10,000 years."
Read 4 tweets
26 Jan
1) People should pay close attention to @ggreenwald. Agree with him or not on certain issues, he projects a sincere and principled wisdom of universal value. realclearpolitics.com/video/2021/01/…
2) "'A lot of times if you warn of a danger you have to piece things together in order to demonstrate that it's actually coming,' Greenwald said. 'In this case, you don't have to. They are explicitly saying precisely what they want to do.'"
3) "What struck me so much about that John Brennan video is it would be one thing if they were saying, 'Look, there is a band of people, 20 here, 50 over here who wear swastika armbands, who are still in the KKK. There's maybe 2,000.'"
Read 10 tweets
25 Jan
The House leadership just announced that Rep. Barbara Lee will be in charge of the State Department budget.

Lee is a longtime collaborator with Kremlin political warfare operations. When she was a congressional staffer, she collaborated with the Cuban regime against the US.
.@RepBarbaraLee will chair the State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Subcommittee of the House Committee on Appropriations.

This is like putting a Cuban or Russian agent in charge of the US State Department budget.
Profile of Barbara Lee, 2001: Confidant to Black Panther leader Huey Newton, a longtime aide to pro-Kremlin Congressman Ron Dellums, a collaborator with Fidel Castro's regime & Soviet front groups.

Pelosi just put her in charge of the @StateDept budget. washingtontimes.com/news/2001/sep/…
Read 4 tweets
24 Jan
1) @TulsiGabbard on anti-terror bill

"It’s so dangerous...this is an issue that all Democrats, Republicans, independents, Libertarians should be extremely concerned about, especially because we don’t have to guess about where this goes or how this ends.” nationalreview.com/news/tulsi-gab…
2) Tulsi Gabbard: "When you have people like former CIA Director John Brennan openly talking about how he’s spoken with or heard from appointees and nominees in the Biden administration who are already starting to look across our country ...."
3) ". . . for these types of movements similar to the insurgencies they’ve seen overseas, that in his words, he says make up this unholy alliance of religious extremists, racists, bigots, he lists a few others and at the end, even libertarians.” (From Tulsi Gabbard)
Read 6 tweets
16 Jan
Keep an eye on @RepMcGovern, the Massachusetts congressman who's proposing a lot of draconian measures on the country right now. He was a big advocate for President Obama to pardon Soviet atomic bomb spy Ethel Rosenberg. rfc.org/sites/default/…
Ditto for @SenMarkey, who was a congressman at the time. Markey defended a convicted Soviet spy, yet accused his political opponents of colluding with Russia. rfc.org/sites/default/…
.@SenWarren spoke asked Obama to "exonerate" Soviet spy Ethel Rosenberg, too. rfc.org/sites/default/…
Read 4 tweets
10 Jan
.@ProjectLincoln, co-founded by former Russian registered agent John Weaver, is working with the Biden administration on a political hunt of all officials who served in the Trump Administration.
These are the people, organized by a registered agent for Vladimir Putin, who are helping the Biden team that they helped elect. nypost.com/2020/07/21/lin… @ProjectLincoln
Here is the US Justice Department document which @ProjectLincoln co-founder John Weaver (@jwgop) signed as an agent of the Russian government in 2019. Weaver's specific Russian client is the unit that makes the nuclear warheads aimed at us. efile.fara.gov/docs/6677-Exhi…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!