We have written to members of the Justice Committee today, to highlight two pieces published this week which are relevant to their consideration of the Hate Crime and Public Order Bill.
First is a report yesterday that an investigation into Lidia Falcon, a distinguished Spanish feminist, has been dropped, but only after she was interviewed by prosecututors. She had been reported for transphobic hate crime (our rough translation here). actuall.com/familia/la-fis…
Both pieces illustrate that whatever technical legal threshold is set for offences of stirring up hatred, on issues related to sex and gender identity that may be a weak barrier to individuals becoming caught up unreasonably in the criminal justice system.
We remain deeply concerned that the consideration of the protection of freedom of expression here risks being over-reliant on the technical bar in law being regarded as high.
We continue to believe that, even if successful prosecutions turn out to be rare, the Committee cannot be confident that complaints will not lead to individuals being caught up in the criminal justice system, for doing things the Parliament never intended to criminalise.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Our latest blog considers discussions about freedom of expression protections in the Hate Crime and Public Order Bill which are taking place behind closed doors: murrayblackburnmackenzie.org/2021/02/15/fre…
The Hate Crime Bill extends the existing offence of “stirring up hatred” in relation to race, to a wider range of characteristics. We have written previously about the need for a bespoke protection for stirring up hatred on basis of transgender identity. murrayblackburnmackenzie.org/2021/01/31/hat…
The Justice Committee agreed with the Cabinet Secretary for Justice on 2 February to commence a new programme of work, to create a general provision intended to strengthen the protection in the Bill for freedom of expression across all characteristics, other than religion.
Stage 2 proceedings on the Hate Crime and Public Order Bill are just about to begin. You can watch the livestream here: scottishparliament.tv/channel/virtua…
Freedom of expression amendments first. Calls on Liam McArthur to move amendment 103.
LM: believes passionately in freedom of expression even when challenging or offensive. But necessary limits on that. Establishing thresholds not easy or straightforward.
Our statement in response to this evening's developments on the Stage 2 amendments to the Hate Crime and Public Order Bill relating to freedom of expression. murrayblackburnmackenzie.org/2021/02/01/deb…
We are concerned that one important decision has already been made behind closed doors – namely that for everything other than religion, there should be one generic freedom of expression provision.
This contrasts substantially in both parliamentary process and substantive content, with the tailored freedom of expression provisions in the 1986 Act, introduced after intense discussion and amendment in the Lords.
Our Stage 2 Briefing on the Hate Crime Bill sets out the need for a tailored freedom of expression protection for transgender identity. We set out 40 examples that show how low the threshold for behaviour or communications considered abusive already is. murrayblackburnmackenzie.org/2021/01/31/hat…
Our examples include the freedom of expression amendments respectively lodged by the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Liam Kerr MSP, the first of which has already been described as a ‘transphobes charter’.
We show how it can be deemed transphobic to advocate for female-only spaces & services, or collect data on biological sex - and how women have already faced lost their jobs, faced disciplinary action, been interviewed by the police & had their details recorded as a result.
We consider here the various amendments which have been put down to the Hate Crime and Public Order Bill on freedom of expression relating to transgender identity. murrayblackburnmackenzie.org/2021/01/27/pro…
The Justice Committee will start to consider potential amendments to Bill on Tuesday 2 February. The Cabinet Secretary for Justice, Humza Yousaf has put down an amendment (amendment 82) which says:
The SG originally argued that no additional protections were needed here, so the recognition of the principle that there needs to be some additional provision in the Bill is welcome. However, this is a less expansive format than existing equivalent provisions.
The Justice Committee starts its Stage 2 scrutiny of the Hate Crime and Public Order Scotland Bill a week today (Tues 2 February). This is where the detailed content is formally considered and agreed, and the Bill can be amended./
@JohannLamont MSP has put down an amendment adding "sex" to Part 1 of the Bill. Part 1 provides that an offence can be treated as "aggravated by prejudice" if it is motivated "by malice or ill-will" towards certain listed groups. beta.parliament.scot/-/media/files/…
The Bill as drafted provides that sex might be added at some later date using secondary legislation, after the Working Group on Misogynistic Harrassment reports. The amendment switches the default assumption in the Bill to *including* sex, until any alternative is identified./