My view is most Republican Senators are like their voters and their votes reflect their values. The more reasonable "beliefs" they share with press and Democrats behind the scenes are lies. Assuming off the record is more honest is pervasive, but not empirically based.
GOP coulda blocked Trump in 2016 but didn't bc they preferred him to Ted Cruz.
GOP coulda convicted twice but didn't bc he markets them to non-college voters more effectively than anyone else.
GOP coulda allowed some oversight on stuff their base woulda cared about, but nah.
Rob Portman is RETIRING and voted to acquit. Portman is surely a major source of off the record Trump critique.
It was all bull in order to maintain influence with plugged in DC nonpartisans like the traditional media and corporate politicos squeamish about fascism.
If you think the bulk of the GOP is just kidding about Trump, you become less committed to fighting fascism. You can pretend lefty "cancel culture" is some huge issue. You can retain norma in Transition, rather than serious De-Trumpification.
The relative mix of cynicism and sincerity in GOP pro-acquittal electeds support of Trump surely varies individual by individual. But that they support him VASTLY more than their off the record comments to people perceived to lack respect for or fear him?
I'm extremely confident
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Insane! The @washingtonpost editorial board attacks @revolvingdoorDC research file on Jeffrey Zients for being fair enough to include the positive purpose of Zients in government (seeking efficiency) & ignoring and ignoring... washingtonpost.com/opinions/biden… (1/x)
how we found out about Zients' purchase of a surprise medical billing operation. (btw, "long term holdings" wannabe Berkshire Hathaway funds like Cranemere engage in EXTENSIVE due diligence, they knew what they were doing). nytimes.com/2020/12/01/us/… (2/x)
How do you write about @revolvingdoorDC criticism of Zients without taking into account Zeints' leading role in NorthStar Anesthesia? (3/x)
REMINDER AS YOU READ about "widely respected" attorney Abbe Lowell... many DC BigLaw lawyers are "widely respected" for... bogus reasons. It's a mutual back scratching culture. nytimes.com/2020/12/03/us/… (1/x)
As the Wall Street Journal summarized... Lowell is an equal opportunity fixer for both parties. He went MAGA fixer for Jared Kushner + if indications of as yet unproven allegations bear out, maintained as much ethics as one expects for a Kushner lawyer. /2 wsj.com/articles/both-…
Please keep Abbe Lowell in mind if and when a BigLaw partner is chosen by Biden as Attorney General. Any such pick (e.g., Trump law firm King & Spaulding's Sally Yates) will receive bipartisan hosannas. As did BILL BARR!!! (3/x)
Here's my hot take -- one I kinda believe, even as I suspect no one will agree.
COVID-19 ultimately didn't hurt, and may have helped, Trump & the GOP in the election.
Arguments:
1. Biden will end up winning by amount he was beating Trump in head to heads pre-pandemic. (1/x)
2. COVID-19 became THE STORY, crowding out...well, all of the other stories.
3. It *IS* a pandemic, & 1 that throughout October became increasingly terrible across the world. Blaming Trump for COVID-19 much less fair than blaming him for cutting taxes for rich, anti-ACA, etc 2/x
4. Trump got to make essentially unchallenged claim that economy all good pre-COVID-19. Why blame him for a pandemic also crushing Europe.
5. Biden spent shockingly little time describing the medhanics of Trump's HHS/CDC effing up pandemic response, just assumed people knew. 3/x
Now it is up to a President Biden -- and forgive me, we DO know that is what's happening -- to view running the executive branch effectively as the main way to both deliver results and de-radicalize the country. (2/x)
Biden GESTURED at this theory of the case, but with no detail. And pelosi's STEADFAST AVERSION to oversight made it an unnecessarily hard story to tell. (3/x)