You buy them out of convenience, they're actually an index that is automatically rebalanced in a multi-asset liquidity pool.
Such as:
THOR.USD (important)
THOR.CRYPTO
THOR.ALTCOIN
THOR.DEFI
THOR.TEN
Let's take a look.
You hold this asset because: 1) It is an index that automatically and efficiently rebalances 2) They are yield generating, you are paid an interest to hold them (comes from liquidity fees from the pool)
Composites are generated from the liquidity shares of multi-asset synthetic liquidity pools.
Means they can be made up of 2+ synths, in equal proportions.
Arbitrage agents keep the pools balanced for profit, and liquidity fees go back to the composite, which generates yield.
Synthetic assets are generated from the liquidity shares of native assets + RUNE.
So demand for composites -> demand for synthetics -> demand for the underlying + RUNE.
This ensure the system ALWAYS has enough liquidity, and continually pulls in RUNE.
Composites (like synths) are IBC-compatible, so can be sent anywhere into the Cosmos.
THOR.USD is a strongly-pegged stablecoin of a basket of median-priced stablecoins, which automatically curates its members and rebalances.
AND it will be interest bearing.
And all of this can be achieved without any oracles.
The power of RUNE-paired cross-chain liquidity pools.
Stay tuned, the design is still being finalised, but you can start to see the trajectory of #THORFi.
$RUNE
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
An interesting idea from @TusharJain_ - to use Liquidity Provider tranches in order to address Impermanent Loss.
Two tranches in a pool:
* Junior Tranche is as today
* Senior Tranche shares only 20% of pool income, but has IL insured by the earnings from Junior Tranche.
In effect creating two classes of LPs.
Those that are after low-risk, low-reward capital markets.
Those that are after higher-risk, higher-reward.
In a hypothetical scenario, two LPs enter a pool, a Junior and a Senior.
The pool experiences no IL: Junior makes 4 times as much in earnings as Senior.
The pool experiences IL: The senior's capital is protected by as much earnings as it takes, deducted from the Junior.
THORChain are please to unveil the @gauntletnetwork analysis of the liquidity-sensitive fee (slip-based) model of THORChain's continuous liquidity pools.
This work was commissioned to validate some assumptions around the model and to get a neutral third-party to challenge it.
Gauntlet set a scenario where liquidity would choose between an XYK exchange (uniswap) and a CLP exchange (THORChain).
Three agents (LP, demand trader and arb trader) each with competing priorities interacted.
A "secondary market" provided the price paths.
LPs monitored both exchanges and would move their funds where the ROI is highest.
This behaviour has already been seen today between Uniswap and Sushiswap (multiple times liquidity sloshed between both)
If you hold a Bitcoin UTXO that you can spend, you sign a tx and broadcast it. Individual Bitcoin miners can choose to not to process it, but they cannot stop it being eventually processed.
Bitcoin users do not have a relationship with miners, and miners don't hold funds.
If you sign a tx spending Bitcoin into THORChain, it will get processed by miners, then witnessed by THORNodes into the state machine. Any THORNode can choose not to witness it, but they will get unavoidably slashed.
So it will eventually end up in the state machine.
* Because the team recognised early that memetic growth of the network is an important driver to gaining widespread adoption. *
Simply, because it's a meme.
/thread
Decentralised crypto money networks are held together by the people who make it.
The more they can identify with each other, share their ideas, spread their memes, the stronger the network is.
Norse mythology is as old as time itself, arguably one of the strongest memes ever
Norse Mythology likely descends from the Old Testament (Book of Genesis) containing similar ideas (even a version of Adam & Eve - Aska & Embla, with similar fates).
It's a rich brand, woven in and out of culture for thousands of years, including recent comics and movies.
If they are wrapped/pegged, the project is out-sourcing security to another protocol.
THORChain secures native assets.
2) Is the security model scalable?
If the security model is "proof of stake" but does not couple the security of vaulted assets with their value, then the protocol can become unsafe.
THORChain uses an Incentive Pendulum - which is scalable and autonomous.
3) Does the protocol use Atomic Swaps?
Atomic Swaps are a deal-breaker for incentivised liquidity pools, since Atomic Swaps cannot be pooled or incentivised, and is vulnerable to the "American Call Option"