So it turns out when @FedEx is having any kind of service disruptions (say, due to weather) the first thing that goes down is their tracking. So their site will continue to say "On Time, Will Be Delivered By (original date)" until the thing just doesn't show up and you complain.
So the ONE thing you need package tracking for - to find out if it's not going to be there on time - it doesn't do. It literally only tracks if everything is going perfectly. If there's a problem, it just stops updating and, hilariously, defaults to "Will be there on time."
This is because tracking doesn't update unless someone scans the package for pickup/transit/etc. If no one scans, it just keeps the original status ("Will be there on [original date]") forever. If a scan is missed or never done, tracking has no ability to update to note it.
ie, their package tracking literally only tracks packages that don't need tracking, and completely loses sight of packages that need tracking (because the recipient didn't get them). I find that fascinating.

Side note: FedEx does not offer refunds of any kind, for any reason.
Just to be clear: I know this is a natural disaster. If they had updated their tracking page to nothing but a graphic of a snowman giving me the finger, I'd have been 100% fine. But instead it kept telling me, "Don't worry, this package of medication will arrive on time!"
It's the equivalent to a traffic light that, when electricity goes out, just defaults to "green" in all directions. Their "deliveries not being made due to snow horror" message is "Don't worry, we'll get it there!" and only upon calling do you find out what's actually happening.
(What's happening is that FedEx is down nationwide, because their biggest hub, Memphis, is closed completely, along with many smaller ones. If you have a package out, ignore the tracking - it almost certainly is trapped in a warehouse).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jason "David Wong" Pargin

Jason

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JohnDiesattheEn

17 Feb
Rush wasn't about outrageous quotes or bigoted bits, lots of people make their living that way. He was about building an army, actively encouraging his millions of followers to be "Dittoheads", fans who'd go out into the world and fight the opposing tribe. It transformed America.
Rush effectively created Fox News, created the audience for it with relentless messaging about how no non-conservative media could be trusted. Without Rush there's no Fox News, there's no Hannity, no Trump, no Alex Jones... none of this.
That ultra hyper-aggressive style that now dominates politics, the snide dismissiveness, the mockery as a form of debate, the nationalization of all politics, the elevation of obscure local controversies into national cancel campaigns -- that was all Rush. He popularized it.
Read 6 tweets
19 Jan
Call me crazy but if any political figure believes deep down that America would be better off as a white ethnostate or whatever, I'd prefer they just openly campaign for that rather than cloak it in "restoring our glorious founding heritage" and other code words like this. 1/
Like if you ask a normal person "Do you want a White Nationalist candidate on the debate stage?" they'll of course say no. But I'd prefer that to what we have now - people who believe the EXACT same thing but know to dress it up in euphemisms about our "values" etc. 2/
If that's our choice, then I'd prefer to just openly have that debate, rather than have to spend 95% of the discussion having to pierce their camouflage. I think it's the camouflage that gives mainstream voters enough of a fig leaf to pull the lever. 3/
Read 5 tweets
19 Jan
One thing the events of Jan 6th made clear is that the vast majority of people who like to threaten violent revolution have a ridiculous, cartoonish, immature idea of what such a thing would actually look like. The reality of it, if glimpsed for one minute, would flatten them.
And I'm not even talking about "Our opponents have guns, too!" but just the everyday reality of living in that situation. They're picturing badass battle scenes, not their screaming child dying of diarrhea because water, sanitation and healthcare services have been disrupted.
They're not imagining the sadists who run wild in a power vacuum, the unchecked sexual assaults, navigating black markets for basic supplies, shivering in the winter because gas and electricity systems have been bombed, losing access to their money because assets have been frozen
Read 5 tweets
11 Jul 20
I could spend all day on why The Old Guard on Netflix is hilariously bad, but I'll start with this: Charlize Theron plays an immortal warrior who is at least 2,000 years old who has grown disillusioned because the world "just keeps getting worse." Worse than ... 2000 years ago?
To her, the concept of "clean drinking water" on demand would still be an amazing novelty. The concept of women not dying in childbirth, of getting to sleep through surgery, of not dying of routine infections, all would still be relatively brand new in that time scale.
It's such a silly and insulting appeal to 2020 viewers. "Literally no one has ever had it harder than you, person who can afford all of the things required to watch streaming video on demand!" The real version of that person would marvel at the idea of "paved roads everywhere."
Read 4 tweets
11 Jun 20
If a tiny fraction of votes swing differently in 2016, right now Hillary's re-election would be down double digits to Trump (who you know would have run again), who'd be running against her COVID-19 response that left like 30K dead or something. And he'd be dominating.
It'd be so perfect for him because he could run on pure venom. It'd be 100% "If you'd let me build the wall, not a single person would have died" and vicious attacks on how this is what you get when a woman is in charge of anything. There'd have been like 3 impeachments by now.
The GOP controlled Senate wouldn't have approved a single judge, having established that they will not approve any judges from the opposition party. Anti-Hillary content would be the biggest windfall right-wing YouTube could have ever imagined. The sheer hate would be stunning.
Read 4 tweets
24 Apr 20
One of the weirdest yet important trends I saw in my years at Cracked is something that is rarely discussed: As readers migrated from browsing on desktop to mobile, their preferences and behavior changed completely, but NOT because readers got dumber/worse (they didn't). THREAD!
On mobile, all reader preferences or tastes were soon replaced by just one: URGENCY. Any piece that was a little creative or playful in its delivery or that drove home its point in an ironic or backhanded way, was traffic death. Everything had to be directly stating facts. 2/
In the desktop era, readers would bookmark a site and just visit every day to see what fun thing you'd planned. On a phone, readers would browse some link aggregator (reddit, facebook, whatever) and only tap on the links that seemed the most urgent. 3/
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!