Reading through Keir Starmer’s speech, I couldn’t help notice the complete absence of Brexit. Just like Corbyn before him, no acknowledgement of the damage that Brexit has done, no attempt to answer the questions it has posed. Nothing. Even w/ the emollient talk about ‘business’
A perfect opportunity to savage the Tory reputation as the ‘party of business’ and the reckless destruction of the economy. Two for the price of one. Labour can’t/won’t take either because it has colluded with the debacle and doesn’t have the courage now to even raise it
At a time when so many businesses are being hammered by Brexit and abandoned by the government. Instead we get tepid pledges not to return to ‘normality’ - as if Covid were the only thing that has wrecked the notion of what ‘normality’ means anymore
And still Labour is apologising and promising it won’t overspend and be fiscally profligate as if we were still back in 2010. When Covid has shown that austerity was always a political, or rather, an ideological choice, as Starmer puts it. Why does Labour still do this?
Why is it still saying essentially ‘we won’t be incompetent (again)’ when dealing with Tory governments that have shown themselves repeatedly to be staggeringly off-the-scale incompetent? Why does Labour stand before the electorate with head bowed and cap in hand after this?
It staggers me. And why the insistence on the ‘homeowning’ dream and no reference to rent control - so important for the young - as if owning your own home were somehow more transcendent an aspiration than living in one?
No one expects Starmer to rant and rave. But there is a terrible disconnect between the insipid warmed-over Milibandism and the dire situation in which we all find ourselves. Not to mention an absence of anger, passion,belief that this voter at least finds very dispiriting.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matt Carr

Matt Carr Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MattCarr55

1 Jan
I really can’t see how, after the last four and half years, the breakup of the UK can be avoided. What a historical irony that a Brexit intended to make Britain ‘great again’ actually brings about the demise of ‘Great’ Britain.
I actually don’t see this as a bad thing. After all, the aggressive chauvinistic nationalism, hubris, and exceptionalism that made Brexit possible is predominantly an English phenomenon. Part of the historical paradox whereby Englishness expresses itself through Britishness,
without explicitly recognising that this nationalism is primarily embedded in England rather than the Celtic periphery. A United Ireland is long overdue. Scotland - regardless of the debates about the economic viability of independence- has reached the point when a decisive
Read 9 tweets
30 Dec 20
I can understand why Labour took the position it did today, but like so much of its response to Brexit these last four and half years, I still think it was in the end cowardly, based entirely on Labour’s party interests, and a failure of national leadership & opposition
I’m not expecting a Rejoin or Remain position, but given that this deal failed its ‘six tests’, and given that it’s plainly not in the national interest, and achieved through one of most reckless and corrupt diplomatic processes in UK history, Labour could have abstained at least
Now they co-own the deal, and even though Starmer has said aspects of it can be revisited, I don’t think Labour will escape that co-ownership, especially as Tory Brexiters will almost certainly revisit and renege on elements of it, just as they did with the WA
Read 10 tweets
24 Dec 20
This is sad day for millions of us - not because we wanted No Deal. That was always a Brexiter demand, which, ironically, many of those who are now praising John-Son-Un’s ‘victory’ were baying for only yesterday. I’m relieved that the U.K. was not stupid enough to do this, but
This country has now completed the dismal trajectory of the last 4 years and embraced a mean, shrunken vision of the future, whose consequences - for now - have been hidden by vainglorious delusions and the Tory political machine. It’s a future in which the country will be poorer
Poorer economically, culturally, spiritually, and politically, as countries that succumb to chauvinism and ethnonationalist exceptionalism always are. The predictions made by Brexiters in 2016 have already fallen so far short of the mark that I very much doubt whether
Read 16 tweets
22 Dec 20
The #Kent lorry debacle was not caused by Brexit. But it is very Brexity. Why? Firstly, because it shows once again the lack of preparation that has become a hallmark of Brexit, and of this government in particular. Even before the new covid variant was officially announced
there were already lorries building up at the ports. It would have been obvious that France and other EU countries would want to close their borders off to travellers coming from UK who might carry the new covid variant.
Yet the U.K. did not liaise with the French beforehand as to how to prevent blockages, because a Brexit UK government would never do that with the foreign countries that have in effect become our imaginary enemies, especially the bloody French. Boney! Macron! Same thing!
Read 11 tweets
21 Dec 20
Alcoholics only begin the road to recovery when they recognise they are ill. Politically-speaking, we are an ill country, engaging in self-harm. We have succumbed to exceptionalism, fanaticism, delusional thinking. Chosen worthless politicians whose incompetence we disregarded
Until it was too late. We have pointlessly alienated and antagonised countries that used to be our friends and neighbors, some of which tried to warn us that they we were damaging ourselves as well as damaging them. We have refused to look at the actual nuts and bolts
Of our connections to Europe and the wider world. We have consistently placed what we want or think we want over what is actually possible. We have ignored the risks and the dangers and failed to prepare adequately for them. We elected, with a huge majority, a government
Read 8 tweets
12 Dec 20
Astonishing to think that only 4 years ago:

we were a respected member of the EU helping to design and shape the rules that bound it together.

most of us barely thought about Europe except when considering where to live, study, or go on holiday or which language to learn
we traded smoothly with 27 countries, exporting and importing to cities across the continent without tariffs or paperwork

our industries and supermarkets operated according to just-in-time supply lines that could deliver goods and components exactly when needed
people from across the continent came to live, work, and study here because there was work for them to do and because they liked our country and the people in it
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!