Our govts have pursued budget surpluses on the backs of poor ppl for decades, wrongly criminalising + harassing us.

And long before #robodebt they knew it wasn’t legal.

ty to @SquigglyRick for the reporting
Two court cases showed @JuliaGillard’s gov was unlawfully pursuing criminal prosecutions for welfare overpayments.

Ppl went to jail because of this. And the ALP ruthlessly sought to protect these unlawful convictions.

Full article here: thesaturdaypaper.com.au/news/politics/…
15,000 people.

15,000 people who were criminalised long before #robodebt who have never received justice.

If you were prosecuted for an overpayment before 2013 this could be you.
Another shameful cover up by @Anne_Ruston’s department.
It is the responsibility of the government to contact people affected by this to right the wrong. And as usual they are failing in their duty of care.
So much pain and damage done, all for the sake of meeting KPIs.
The perverse incentives that exist in employment services also exist in Centrelink.

The social security law is designed to hurt us and the culture in these organisations is the product of that.
“It is important to ask questions about how well-resourced government departments effectively bookended a decade with two landmark legal defeats marked by horrendous human consequences,” – @DarrenODonovan
Why does the department insist on putting its head in the sand when legal concerns are raised about its activities?

Because of those KPIs. Because of pressure from ministers. Because of budget surplus. Because they assume we are too scared and too weak to fight back and win.
It is the public’s money.

The public deserve to know @stuartrobertmp
We shouldn’t have to battle our own government for information about their bungled programs.

Without @jpwarren there is so much we wouldn’t know about #robodebt
They knew. From the very beginning.

@ScottMorrisonMP ploughed ahead anyway, with no regard for the human cost of his decisions.
“I thought there must have been something in there that gave them a leg to stand on,”
It’s so obvious. How many times were legal concerns documented? How many times did staff try to point out the inherent logical flaws?
There are so many questions unanswered about the way govs have unlawfully pursued ppl living on poverty payments over minor accounting errors. We can only uncover more of the truth through a royal commission. Into #robodebt, but also into the criminal prosecutions program.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with AUWU #80aDay

AUWU #80aDay Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AusUnemployment

19 Feb
There are 400,000 people on unemployment payments – that’s 1 in 4 people – who can’t work full time for health reasons, bc they have caring responsibilities, are experiencing domestic violence or are in similarly difficult circumstances. #80aDay
If you want to use the beautiful #80aDay graphics designed by @jezheywood you can download them all here, in both Facebook and Twitter sizes: 1drv.ms/f/s!Ao2X7nRblA…
The average length of time people are stuck on unemployment payments has increased from just over 2yrs in 2014 to 3.5 yrs in 2020.

The govt fails to provide a job for everyone who wants one but insists on forcing us to try and survive in deep poverty. #80aDay
Read 7 tweets
17 Feb
More gleeful mockery from @SHamiltonian in response to our distress at his @BlueprintInsti1 proposal to spend $9 billion creating two classes of unemployed people instead of lifting us out of poverty. #80aDay

A thread for Steven + anyone who thinks this scheme is a good idea 👇 Image
Income protection insurance already exists. It's available to anyone who's taken on debt, private school fees or made other financial commitments that people living in poverty can't even dream of.

Placing a regressive tax on workers to fund this w public money instead is a sham.
Our welfare system must support everyone equally.

Right now w unemployment payments set at 40% below the poverty line, it barely supports us at all – we still can't afford the basics. This is the same amount as @SHamiltonian's proposal for longer term unemployed ppl. #80aDay
Read 14 tweets
8 Dec 20
We have not received a response to the letter we sent to @Senator_Patrick requesting a meeting with us, @NATSILS_ and @NTCOSS.

Watch the debate and see how he votes here: aph.gov.au/Watch_Read_Lis…
Our members in Ceduna strongly oppose the #CashlessDebitCard + have campaigned against it for yrs. Reporting from @lukehgomes shows the card is causing harm in communities. @Senator_Patrick cannot in good conscience vote for this bill and should not blame Ceduna for his decision.
Ok, here we go
Read 106 tweets
8 Dec 20
The #CashlessDebitCard is coming up for debate in the senate.

Follow along live to see whether @Senator_Patrick and @JacquiLambie vote on principle or decide to play politics with people's lives.

aph.gov.au/Watch_Read_Lis…
Labor standing firmly against the CDC legislation in the senate, pointing out the Card is racist, & discriminatory. @SenKatyG says there’s no reason the g’ment had to push it through this week — we agree
Now @SenatorSiewert is up: she references the report leaked to the Guardian yesterday, that g’ment tried to hide. “This isn’t based on evidence or what works — this is based on ideology.”
Read 11 tweets
1 Jul 20
Another disgusting manipulation of the PM's dodgy data, this time from @7NewsAustralia and @CoughlanMatt

7news.com.au/business/finan…
First, for an honest breakdown of the figures, see @danielhurstbne's piece: theguardian.com/australia-news…

So: "27% of employers are having or *expect to have* trouble filling jobs" – that's 139 of 2324, or 6% some of whom only 'expect' to have difficulty; they haven't actually tried.
After working hard to get 6% to sound like a third, this: "Of those, 52 per cent said a lack of applicants was behind the problem." Half! That sounds like a lot!

1/2 of 139 = ~70 ... 70 ÷ 2324 = 3%

Funny how 53% seems like a lot less when you realise it's actually 3% 🤷
Read 6 tweets
30 Mar 20
AUWU is proud to be a founding signatory of the @InstituteGreen #NobodyLeftBehind campaign.

Here's what it's all about:

"These times call for extraordinary measures from governments to introduce a floor below which no one in our society can fall ..."
"... to assure all people that they will not be left behind, that they will be cared for and provided with necessities of life"

#NobodyLeftBehind
"As the long and dangerous queues at #Centrelink offices and the unmanageable demand on the MyGov website demonstrate, the current approach, even with these important shifts, is insufficient"

#NobodyLeftBehind
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!