Much of the chatter about Twitch and Metallica and copyright is getting the facts and the history wrong. Quick thread.
The short version is that people are confusing the DMCA itself with particular companies' choices about how to implement the DMCA. That works to the benefit of huge companies like Amazon (owner of Twitch); they end up escaping scrutiny.
Jeff Bezos is worth $197 Billion. Twitch can afford to pay for music licensing! And any artist who controls their own publishing has the ability to waive their exclusive rights if they want to perform their own material and don't mind that the service isn't paying them.
If it's unclear who made the decision to swap the Metallica performance audio and why, we do know it wasn't because they were "forced" to by the DMCA.
We know that because the same performance was simultaneously streaming on other platforms with no trouble. This happened because 1) some person made a mistake 2) some automated system made a mistake or 3) Twitch failed to secure necessary licenses.
In any case, responsibility for the incident lies with Twitch. Now, here's why this matters for people who aren't megastars, musicians who aren't household names, and who rely on the internet to reach audiences AND hope to get paid fairly...
Big tech companies want musicians & music on their platforms, because musicians attract lots of users. They also want to avoid having to pay for music rights to the extent they can, because it’s an expense, and it cuts into profitability. So they have to balance concerns.
Musicians don’t have a lot of bargaining power with big platforms. A good reference to understand this is @linamkhan’s paper “sources of tech platform power” georgetownlawtechreview.org/wp-content/upl… Lina’s the biggest expert there is on Amazon, it’s just 10 pages don’t be scared!
Services have to get licenses if they want to use music. They negotiate with rightsholders and sometimes with Performing Rights Organizations. (In some case they can pay for a statutory license at government-set rates. And uses that qualify as fair use don't need a license.)
But there's a downward pressure on the price that all creators get paid for music that comes from dysfunction in the way the DMCA is currently operating, which doesn't really benefit small creators or users.
Here's a whole thread unpacking that topic from last June when Congress was looking at it:
At the same time that Congress is looking at how/whether to fix this problem (there have been good ideas floated and some terrible ones), Twitch/Amazon continue to negotiate with rightsholders.
Poorly understood, incidents like this leave twitch viewers and users and casual readers of media accounts convinced that every copyright annoyance is a result of a dumb law they don't like but don't fully understand, and probably music industry greed.
(To be clear, we think most Twitch users and most citizens generally are really smart! There's just a lot going on to obscure the real state of power relations, and especially how workers are impacted!)
There are problems with the DMCA, and big corporations do have too much power in the music industry. But Amazon alone is 20 times the size of the entire recorded music business.
When people are encouraged to direct all their ire at the DMCA (not at Amazon's failure to implement it correctly) or at the music biz, it improves Amazon's bargaining position in licensing negotiations, and imperils Congress's ability to achieve needed reforms.
That's not a good outcome for musicians and it's not a good outcome for audiences (including Twitch users, and potentially users of other innovative/competitive platforms).
Amazon is under intense scrutiny from Congress for its efforts to distort markets, surveil workers, crush unions, and pay workers less (not just musicians); the pandemic has only increased Amazon's power. There are more hearings scheduled soon.
TLDR: we can enjoy the lolz at the 8-bit goofiness juxtaposed with the visuals, but let's all spend less time dunking on Lars and more time trying to understand the actual state of power relations and help workers.
On that last point, join us Monday for this event on improving COVID unemployment benefits! eventbrite.com/e/rep-adam-sch…
And for good resources on Amazon, follow @ilsr @openmarkets @econliberties @athenaforall
Forgot to mention: the DMCA became law in 1998. Metallica’s lawsuit against Napster was in 2000. There are a lot of things that are frustrating about the state of the DMCA, but blaming Metallica for them makes no sense!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Future of Music Coalition

Future of Music Coalition Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @future_of_music

20 Feb
This is a really interesting small study on what's working with music livestreams. It's also a good example of how to present research. (quick thread) nmbx.newmusicusa.org/livestream-com…
First, the study acknowledges its limitations up front. It's a quite small sample size, and a specific group of respondents whose experience may not be representative of broader populations.
Importantly the authors make an effort to identify gaps in the data: "none of the respondents identified as disabled/having a disability ...we do not have the perspective of anyone who is blind/low vision or deaf/hard-of-hearing [... ] trying to navigate livestreams."
Read 6 tweets
1 Jan
The @FCC was required to release its Communications Marketplace Report before the end of 2020. Congress requires the agency to assess what's happening in the competitive landscape every 2 years. So they did, late yesterday. (THREAD) docs.fcc.gov/public/attachm…
This is the first time the report has been prepared by the FCC's new office of Economics and Analytics. FCC staff put a lot of work in, and it's useful to have this data publicly available, but there are some real problems, as noted by both @JRosenworcel and @GeoffreyStarks.
The report centers economics but comes up short on analysis. Most of the data comes from industry or investment banking firms. When they're the ones funding the research, the research reflects the questions they're interested in.
Read 24 tweets
11 Dec 20
There’s a new bill that harmonizes penalties for illegal streaming services with penalties for illegal download services. FMC has long supported harmonization while wanting to make sure policies don’t have unintended consequences. So how is this bill?
Turns out, it’s pretty narrowly tailored to deal with truly bad actors! Even more narrow than previous attempts to deal with the problem. Unfortunately one of the problems with internet policy is that rhetoric gets heated.
The last couple times bills dealing with these issues were floated, some people made outlandish and frankly dishonest claims, like that it would have sent Justin Bieber to prison.
Read 4 tweets
10 Dec 20
THREAD: one factor leading to low payouts on streaming services is that the market is distorted by competitive services that pay artists nothing at all. At the top of that list is FM radio. This impacts every artist, even those that would never get radio airplay.
Artists love noncommercial, public, college, community stations that serve their communities with diverse music and news programming, but they may never give commercial radio much thought. It's easy to understand why.
Since the 1996 telecommunications act, we've seen rampant ownership consolidation in radio broadcasting, and with that, more and more cookie-cutter playlists, homogenous formats, less diversity, and less local music.
Read 32 tweets
9 Dec 20
The @FTC is suing Facebook, along with State attorneys general. This is an important move that could help musicians.
Over time, have you noticed that Facebook has gotten less useful for musicians? Features that allowed you to easily communicate with fans slowly replaced with advertising tools you have to pay for? FB can get away with it because of monopoly power.
The lawsuit argues that FB has maintained its monopoly position with an anticompetitive “buy or crush” strategy.
Read 5 tweets
27 Oct 20
Quick thread on Spotify discontent: in any kind of corporate accountability work, activists usually end up making demands of companies, including things they know the targeted companies are unable or unwilling to do. It’s a pretty standard tactic and can help shift the discourse.
Some observers are going to look at “impossible demands” as a reason to dismiss activists, or claim that those calling for change don’t understand the issues. This is also a pretty standard tactic, and a risk of that approach.
With streaming royalties & music licensing, the details of agreements are complex, and often deliberately intransparent. Same is true of the business structures behind venture capital, private equity, revenue vs stock price--people get advanced degrees so they can understand it.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!