A memorable moment as a defense lawyer: Sitting across the table from a guy who said, "I knew I was pushing the envelope, but I had no idea I was violating 5 federal statutes."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I put up another video in the series I'm calling "How we got here and How we Get Out"
Why the heck am I doing this? 🤷♀️
I feel a need (and a value) to going back over what I've written about (including in my books) and summing things up
1/
My natural inclination is to put it all in a book (but I have two books in press and a third in progress) ENOUGH BOOKS!
This is way easier than writing a book, anyway.
And it's allowing me to synthesize my thoughts and put it all together.
2/
They are supposed to be viewed in order, but as I said once, if you go out of order the GO IN ORDER police will not come knocking on your door (so don't worry).
3/
Cynicism has been on my mind lately because (1) it's a hallmark of fascism, (2) it's a characteristic of those with authoritarian personalities, and (3) I've seen it lately on left-leaning Twitter.
How?
Like this: "Nothing will happen to X because the system sucks and is unfair and rich people never face consequences."
There are people who have dedicated their lives to reforming the criminal justice system.
The system is better than it was 30 years ago. . .
. . . how do they keep their constituents happy as they rob from them and keep them poor? (Things like give tax cuts to the rich and eliminate health care for all?)
They create a show. They do battle with enemies.
(Snyder quotes fascist philosopher Ivan Ilyin who explains)
2/
Made-up enemies are safest.
The next best are powerless enemies. That's why Trump picked homeless migrants as enemies.
That way the ruling oligarchs don't get hurt and their property doesn't get damaged.
It's also why Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia.
3/
He accuses Defendants of violating the KKK act, which outlaws (among other things) preventing an official from discharging duties. law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42…
Fittingly, the Act was passed after the Civil War when White supremacists violently interfered with lawful processes.
2/
Facts: When Trump, Proud Boys, and pals incited the insurrection, they hindered Thompson in the discharge of his official duties and deprived him of his right to be free from intimidation and threats in the discharge of his duties.
The idea that Trump got off on a technicality is not only false (he got off on a made-up technicality) it's also a slur on "technicalities" which are procedures put in place in the interests of fairness.
1/
If the police screw up, you go free.
If you are guilty, but the only evidence is that the police beat your confession out of you, you get off because we decided that making sure police don't beat confessions out of people is more important than jailing every guilty person.
2/
I understand "getting off on a technicality" means you're guilty but you get off for a reason other than your factual guilt.
Well, one job of a defense lawyer is to check to make sure procedures were followed. Did the police violate the defendant's Fourth Amendment rights?
3/