Mark Amaza Profile picture
21 Feb, 11 tweets, 2 min read
What's happening in Billiri is the fruit of seeds planted since British colonial rule with regards to traditional rulerships in the North:
Creating emirates in Christian-majority areas (e.g Uba in Borno, Jema'a in KD) or where there is no clear religious majority (e.g Mubi)
In some places, traditional emirates were expanded to include areas they didn't before (e.g Biu to cover Buraland & Teraland). In places like Billiri, the first Mai until the one before the recently deceased were Muslim despite the area being predominantly Christian
TheJema'a emirate used to cover all of Southern Kaduna until the 1991 Zangon-Kataf crisis that chiefdoms were created for the many ethnic groups in the area as this was a remote cause of the crisis, with decades of resentment built up over a Fulani Muslim emir ruling over them.
Even at that, there are still calls by many in the region to have the emirate scrapped: when the last emir died in 1998, there were protests against the turbaning of a new one. It was not until the next year for the current emir to be turbaned.
This mishandling of traditional rulerships since pre-independence has played out differently in different areas. My Bura people, for example, don't complain about the emir-ship but kudos to occupants of the office for doing their best to be all-inclusive.
But in other places like Billiri & Southern Kaduna before it, a lot of ethnic and/or religious resentment exists. When the last Emir of Uba died some years ago, there were calls by many to have the office changed to Chief of Uba. There is still resentment from decades ago.
It is not until a conflict is violent that it has taken place. The Billiri conflict has actually been happening for decades before it turned violent. Same happened in Zangon-Kataf. Same is happening in some other areas.
At least, small credit to the Brits for resisting the pressure to create an emirate in Jos. Instead, the Gbong Gwom Jos was created. Yet, there are still under-g moves for that emirate to come to be & it continues to be a source of tension in the city.
Another example to put in this thread: the Fika vs Potiskum emirates in Yobe State. Two old emirates with different ethnicities in charge. The British merged it in 1912, it was un-merged in 2000. Both have headquarters in Potiskum town. They still squabble over land & authority.
This last example popped in my head, esp as some mischief makers are bent on misunderstanding my thread as a Christian vs Muslim one rather than imposition of authority on local populations that are not accepted by them, which creates conflicts.
Sorry, separated in 2010, not 2000

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Amaza

Mark Amaza Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @amasonic

20 Feb
Political hacks, no matter the party affiliation, are folks are avoid here by all means. Those for whom their parties & politicians are never wrong and those on the other side are never right; always so vile; can't ever have a sensible debate with them because all they do is..
.. repeat WhatsApp group talking points & what their party overlords (who are often as dumb as bricks as they are, just with more Twitter followers). The painful part is that these guys hardly (maybe never) amount to anything. Living off scraps but thinking they have made it.
I'm all for people, esp young ppl joining the parties of their choice. Infact, the more achieving (or likely to achieve) in their professional careers, the better. But you see the ones I described above? Total waste.
Read 4 tweets
9 Jun 19
This thing some feminists do where they call women who don't hold the same progressive views on gender relations 'pick-me' is quite short-sighted & erroneously assumes that these women hold these views solely for the approval of men.
On the contrary, it is mostly because this is all they have known & have likely seen around them. Ppl don't let go of ideas & beliefs that have been passed down millennia in an instant.
So yes, you have unlearned your own patriarchal beliefs & you are now fighting for women's/gender equality - but not every woman has done same. It is not by arrogantly calling such women 'pick-mes' that their own views will evolve to be like yours.
Read 8 tweets
9 Oct 18
There is a reason why it took the formation of APC by the merger of 3 regional parties for PDP to have a worthy challenger at the Federal level: national structure.
Without a national structure, it is almost impossible to win the presidency. Does your party have presence in every state, local govt & ward? This matters greatly: it is not by road shows in some states & TV appearances.
If we were in a parliamentary system, smaller parties have a chance of challenging the dominance of the bigger ones by simply denying them the number of seats to form a govt & forcing them into coalitions.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!