Even in the first 20% of the book it‘s _completely_ obvious that @zsviczian is right when he says De Bono has been working on Algorithms of Thought for decades, under a different name.
I feel like I‘m Neo following Morpheus into the Matrix
“All questions are attention-directing devices. We could easily drop out ‘questions’ and instead ask people to direct their attention to specified matters.”
– that‘s an important piece of figuring out how to think better, imo.
De Bono mentions two “Frameworks“ that are roughly analogous to collections of Algorithms of Thought: Six Thinking Hats and CoRT. For a great intro, read @zsviczian‘s series of blogposts starting here zsolt.blog/2020/12/de-bon…
Why do we need Algorithms of Thought?
De Bono:
“All this may seem artificial but it works. Thinking sometimes has to be made artificial and deliberate otherwise we take it for granted and assume that we do things when in fact we do not do them at all.“
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
[[Algorithms of Thought]] are useful because they provide actionable guidance for how to deal with a specific problem without requiring a detailed, fixed checklist in advance. They can guide your thinking without being prescriptive.
The power of [[Algorithms of Thought]] can be even greater when you find ways to _externalise_ them, i.e. do not have to rely on memory to work through them. Memory alone can work well when the algorithm is fairly short and simple – but /
What are the [[Fundamental Skills of Knowledge Work]]? What do you think, #roamcult?
Boring but almost certainly the most undervalued skill by people typing on keyboards for a living the world over: typing speed.
Common objection to that: "My typing is irrelevant, it's the thinking that counts". Wrong. If a basketball player has to consciously think about how many steps they can take while dribbling, they get nowhere. If you need to look at your fingers to hit the right keys – fix that.
[[Knowledge Management]], [[Reproducible [[Social [[Science]]]]]], and [[Academic Workflow]]s – 100 Tweets for @threadapalooza 2020, let's go #roamcult#𐃏
1/100
Pandoc is a magical piece of software, and if you're not using it for your academic writing you're missing out. Compile (basically) any document format to (basically) any other document format.
2/100
While Pandoc is fantastic, it's a bit like ffmpeg: extremely powerful, but without GUI apps too few people will use it. ffmpeg has a ton of GUI apps that basically just wrap the CLI, Pandoc doesn't have enough of them.
3/100
Oh fuck this is genius. Here's how it works: it _moves_ the original block to the new date, and leaves an aliased copy in its original place. So ((ABCD)) from today moves to tomorrow, leaves ((YHDZ)) with identical content and link to ((ABCD)) in its place. This is _amazing_.
Some usability things I'm noticing: since this actually moves blocks to a future daily page, these can get cluttered _really_ fast. Starting a day with a daily page that already has 50 bullet points on there is a very different feeling from starting each day with a blank page.
UI for the increment is currently unclear, but I expect that to change fairly soon. Standard increment atm is 2 days, changing the value in {{[[∆]]:3}} manually is possible, but counts from original entry point (?) so requires thinking, has friction.
.@tombielecki is right - this is paleo logic. But what I don’t get is when people think paleo life was socially and cognitively less demanding than modern life. Thinking out loud here, but...
there’s a reason IG and Twitter etc are so engrossing - we are literally made for this. Is it "more" than 10k years ago? Depends on what "more" is. Medium group (>8) dynamics over long periods of time are hella complex. We live in super tiny groups now, bulk is online.
Most people live alone or with like 4 others max, see a couple of people at work - of course our brains look for drama elsewhere.