Dear Journos,

I hope I am not teaching grandma to suck eggs, but for anyone trying to form a view point on kids and covid may I recommend the following. 🧵
To assess the strength of evidence:

👶🏼 Look for asymptomatic testing in kids. This is important as children usually have no symptoms at the time of infection.

👶🏼 Check to see what other mitigation might be affecting results, like economic shut downs, and in school mitigation.
👶🏼 check to see if the situation the kids were in, in the study, are the same as the situation you are about to face as a society. Look for mask use, ventilation and filtration use, and think... is this what we are doing? Can I expect the same results.
👶🏼 Beware of studies that take the results of lots of other studies and squeeze them together. Usually none of the parameters between different sites are the same, and also some of the measurements (rapid tests vs lab PCR for example).
👶🏼 also check to ensure there is not difficulty accessing testing for kids and people in general. If the queues to test are really long and difficult, expect a slight (or big) underestimate.
👶🏼Check demographics, age etc. does the population in the study apply to the class in question ( although it may or may not affect the underlying mechanics of transmission, it is better to use a “well matched” population).
And also “How to read a paper” by Trish Greenhalgh are excellent short reads and how I learned to read a paper. Image
👶🏼 lastly, please look at the study outcomes measured. There are deaths, education, mental health, family hardship and chronic disease outcomes to investigate. Amongst others I have probably missed out.

Have a list. Is the paper answering your questions?
I hope that this thread will make it easier to deal with experts, because just as it is wise to read the abstract last when reading a paper, so you avoid bias, it is wise to be thoroughly prepped before an expert interview, so you know when bias creeps in.
👶🏼Addendum, on the topic of studies that group other studies together, or “reviews”, always make sure you check what *wasn’t* included, and why.

If you were to run a search on this topic, what search terms would you chose? Did important stuff get left out?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr Noor Bari

Dr Noor Bari Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NjbBari3

16 Mar
Seeing as we are lucky enough to have more than one working vaccine in the world... perhaps a slightly more sensible approach to rare but significant side effects might be to avoid something in groups vulnerable to that particular side effect ->
-> An investigation into factors that might predict a particular outcome might be wise so that we can see if there are any patterns to help avoid issues more easily. Blanket reassurances or shutdowns of programs seems extreme.
I wasn’t going to say anything, but the utter rubbish on the radio in the car on the way home was enough to make anyone go nuts.

Clearly there is a question.

A bunch of politicians saying “Nah she’ll be right” is not going to help, and neither is that crazy antivax poli...!
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!