Andy Mok Profile picture
22 Feb, 20 tweets, 3 min read
Not sure why dollar hegemony is so important? Check out this thread to find out why

The foundation of American hegemony might appear to rest on its military. But, in fact, the true source of American power is based on its currency: The U.S. dollar.
For dollar hegemony allows US to borrow unlimited amounts of money from the rest of the world. Ending this dominance would cut off credit to US and place the cost of American defense spending, and other major government programs squarely on the shoulders of the American voter
This would likely lead to a drastic reprioritization of government spending priorities.

There are four interlocking pieces to this monetary hegemony: (1) The ability to force other countries and companies around the world to denominate their trade in dollars,
(2) controlling access to the global payments system, (3) the primacy of the dollar as a global reserve currency and, perhaps most important, (4) the nature of the dollar as a fiat currency.

These are all currently under threat.
And in a world where changes occurs at faster and faster rates, the demise of the dollar may play out not in decades, as many assume, but perhaps over just a few short years. Recent developments suggest that this process is well under way.
The dollar as a unit of account

By forcing other to price goods and services in dollars, the U.S. creates demand for its currency. This requires buyers to find ways to earn dollars to pay for their purchases.
However, because the dollar is a fiat currency (more on this below), the U.S. can create dollars literally out of thin air without providing anything of value in exchange for a new batch (or boatload) of dollars.
As American economist Barry Eichengreen noted "It costs only a few cents for the Bureau of Engraving and Printing to produce a 100 dollars' bill, but other countries had to pony up 100 dollars' of actual goods in order to obtain one."
This part of dollar hegemony was cemented into place in the 1970s when Saudi Arabia agreed to price oil in dollars in exchange for American military protection (and use those dollars to purchase U.S. government securities).
However, recent developments including the launch of Shanghai oil futures, which are denominated in Renminbi (RMB), offer an alternative. China is already the world's top importer of oil.
With the recent upgrading of China-Russia relations which includes trade in oil priced in RMB, the emergence of another currency as a global unit of account has been firmly established.
Control of the global payment system

The Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Communications (SWIFT) financial messaging service is the primary means to transfer money globally.
Based in Belgium, the member-owned cooperative connects more than 11,000 banks, financial institutions and corporations in more than 200 countries and territories around the world. It serves as the central nervous system of global finance.
So, if a country's banks are cut off from SWIFT it cannot pay for imports or receive payments for exports. But while SWIFT might look like an independent multi-national organization, appearances can be deceiving.
In fact, the U.S. through threats of sanctions against SWIFT's board of directors can force it to disconnect those who displease Washington and it is in fact a crucial tool for maintaining American dollar hegemony.
However, on June 28, France, Germany and the UK announced that an alternative payment system called Instex became operational. This payment balancing system permits companies in Europe to buy Iranian goods, and vice-versa, without accessing SWIFT.
Given the growing number of countries which the U.S. has threatened with economic aggression including China, Iran, Russia, Venezuela and others, the desire for an alternative payment system is undeniable.
The U.S. Treasury Department's undersecretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, Sigal Mandelker, warned Instex President Per Fischer, in a May letter, "I urge you to carefully consider the potential sanctions exposure of Instex.
Engaging in activities that run afoul of U.S. sanctions can result in severe consequences, including a loss of access to the U.S. financial system."
However the timing of the June 28 announcement may signal that a big enough coalition of countries exists to counter or deter US threats against Instex. Moreover, its backers may believe that retaliation by the U.S. will spur even faster adoption of an alternative to SWIFT.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Andy Mok

Andy Mok Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @andymok

22 Feb
Not sure why dollar hegemony is so important? Check out this thread to find out why (Part 2)

The dollar two-step: A fiat currency becomes global reserve currency
Before Aug 13, 1971 the $ was backed by gold-meaning that it could be converted into a certain amount of gold, a physical commodity with real value.
However on that fateful day, President Nixon declared that dollars could no longer be exchanged for gold or any other reserve asset and turned the dollar in fiat money (meaning a currency with no intrinsic value).
Read 12 tweets
17 Feb
A thread on Confucian view of China and the US: One of the most important distinctions that is drawn in traditional Confucian thought is between a "junzi" and a "xiaoren." One who through rigorous and sustained self-cultivation becomes a moral exemplar can be called a "junzi."
While the term "junzi" is sometimes translated as "superior person," it does not refer to a ruler over inferior subjects but rather an upright person who leads by character and conduct.
In contrast, a "xiaoren" is someone who cannot transcend personal concerns and prejudices and acts only for personal gain. And so it is only the "junzi" who can, through virtuous influence and leadership by example, bring about a prosperous and harmonious society.
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!