I always wondered why Nazi Germany initially partitioned France instead of simply occupying it all, and why this was the shape of the border.
I get why Nazis would want all the Atlantic coast, but why leaving a Free Zone at all?
My History books never explained it.
I get why Nazis would want all the Atlantic coast, but why leaving a Free Zone at all?
My History books never explained it.
Then I did this.
And I wonder: Did Nazis simply occupy the plains because they were much more productive and easy to occupy? To avoid the much harder work of facing guerrilla warfare in mountains?
Do you guys know?
And I wonder: Did Nazis simply occupy the plains because they were much more productive and easy to occupy? To avoid the much harder work of facing guerrilla warfare in mountains?
Do you guys know?
Twitter comes through:
Macro:
1. Atlantic+connection to spain+ North-South railway
2. Racial goal
3. Big capitals
4. Productive areas
Northern productivity was a goal, directly & indirectly
Micro: initially random, then iteration for defense optimization
Thx @edenhofer_jacob
Macro:
1. Atlantic+connection to spain+ North-South railway
2. Racial goal
3. Big capitals
4. Productive areas
Northern productivity was a goal, directly & indirectly
Micro: initially random, then iteration for defense optimization
Thx @edenhofer_jacob
https://twitter.com/edenhofer_jacob/status/1363871493323698177
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
