ok, here is a good report on it. NYT reporter in Australia who has covered better than most (did I mention he's in Australia?) 2 month window allowing FB to save face after it's chaos move last week that killed any remaining trust there so spin, spin.
seriously, I don't think press has properly analyzed Facebook's decision to pull out last week and its motivation. It went over as bad as it could, now they're spinning their way out. It's another chapter in Harvard's case study on FB crisis PR failures.
Watch Facebook now spin this overnight. I imagine they're hitting up as much US press as possible with talking points that they've ensured and protected smaller publishers (ignoring fact law already had non-discrimination and collective bargaining in it and still does).
if they're not getting enough nibbles to write their version of events so everyone forgets about that time they blocked all news then they'll offer up calls with Sandberg or something as carrot. This is a big deal to them, they need to save face with other govts now digging in.
actually, it looks like it was embargoed by Facebook. The law is about to pass Senate (House already passed). The headline overnight is going to be Facebook's settlement which saves face and govt gave up nothing really. Instead of headline being the law passed which it should be.
I'm sorry @axios but what???? I bet you a dolla there are zero changes to the baseball-style arbitration. it's core. All they got was a 60 day window to do deals. That's it. The headline here is Facebook caved after a disaster/desperate PR stunt last week.
BBC also has solid report (in addition to NYT) so linking to it here. It mostly focuses on restore of Facebook sharing and the botched move, "a decision the government described as 'arrogant' and 'bullying'." bbc.com/news/world-aus…
I respect the @reuters report also. Very little information which is a responsible way to handle it until further information from local reporters in Australia rather than relying on Facebook's misleading statements and blog post. reuters.com/article/us-aus…
also good report out of @lizzadwoskin linking to report properly characterizing Facebook's move as "brazen" and avoiding any confusing info about the likely very limited amendments to the deal. washingtonpost.com/technology/202…
a solid even report out of Australia (not yet able to shared on Facebook but you can get it here on Twitter!) news.com.au/technology/onl…
and here is @FT @JamieSmythF
@MsHannahMurphy . Pubs with a reporter in Australia and California really are covering this well. Nice benefit of having local journalists - coverage facebook / google will have to properly bargain for after the law passes! ;) ft.com/content/360b04…
another great report from @business, pleased to see really good coverage as more and more catch up and gather what is really happening here. this sort of nails the context to it. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
and here is @FinancialReview which has been covering these developments around the ACCC report, code and now law super well the last few years. Good report, too. afr.com/technology/fac…
Also a good report here from @LisaVisentin. Includes this threat from Campbell Brown, journalist. smh.com.au/politics/feder…
Ha, like the image with this - also an interesting take. Even Facebook's former executives says Facebook was saving face. Ignore Ben Evans, he's called it a "link tax" so he can't be a serious analyst. bbc.com/news/technolog…
Facebook kicking and screaming
Amendments to save face


• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Jason Kint

Jason Kint Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jason_kint

23 Feb
They are serial liars who manipulate press and governments to protect their harmful biz model. Over and over they fall short. Yet many still give them the benefit of doubt when they should be giving Facebook less trust than the Trump administration. I mean...
This is the Facebook executive acting as the spokesperson on developments in Australia on behalf of Facebook. Can you imagine even wanting to speak to him? This was a month before their global scandal. How does he have any credibility with any Parliament in the world?
For those who have never seen this, it led to the absolute greatest grilling ever of a Facebook executive by a Parliament (Singapore) just one month later and a week after Facebook was hit by a global scandal. Must-see-TV. Australia saw this no doubt.
Read 6 tweets
23 Feb
Beyond Cory’s great thread, I have one other comment no press seem to want to dig into. Facebook is a menace to society yet they’re being covered as if they’re a respectable actor. Everything about their pulling out of Australia is hostile and a PR stunt. Why not ask question /1
Why did they pull out Wednesday? Prior to law passing. Here is what still happens...law passes. Facebook gets designated. A pub starts negotiation. 90 days. If no deal, baseball arbitration. Price determined. And still then Facebook could exit market. So why do it last week? /2
One news exec speculated Facebook did it last week because Google’s deal with News Corp was dominating press that day and maybe they could do it quietly. But do you know what the problem is with this hypothesis??? /3
Read 10 tweets
22 Feb
Aargh - in two tweets. This is a terrible move missing precisely on nuance we need in Congress.
(1/2) CableTV : This speech whether on the web or cable is protected from government by 1A. Importantly, it's also subject to more speech (counter-speech and public criticism).
(2/2) Social Media: It's critically important to make this distinction between concerns with Facebook and YouTube that use algorithmic amplification to micro-target content to individuals, outside the public square, with very little transparency or ability to fact check. 2/2
On the social media example, the platforms provide the velocity and reach. I would argue OAN and Newsmax wouldn't even be a thing if it weren't for their clips being spread on social. YouTube is what made OAN, NewsMax, Epoch Times, Russia Today into household names. /3
Read 7 tweets
21 Feb
Ok, Brian knows I’m a loyal watcher but Australia segment was aargh. The law is not about links. The term link tax is loaded based on 2 platforms being described as having links to news sites. Links could go away and they would still have to pay. It’s public policy to move $.
ps @s_guilbeault was great and I endorse Canada’s leadership here, too. Hopefully they model off Australia vs a straight tax or something. Australia is built off antitrust findings of the two companies and involves more than $. Additionally...
it uses a market-based solution to bring the parties to the table including baseball arbitration to avoid slow regulation effects. And the law absolutely helps small publishers!!! It gives them collective bargaining they don’t currently have!!!!
Read 7 tweets
21 Feb
I believe history will prove this org structure has caused more harm in the world than near anything in modern history. This BuzzFeed report is a must-read. /1 buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanma…
First, the report builds on previous reporting by @RMac18 @CraigSilverman and colleagues along with other news outlets including notably the WSJ who has covered the political influences at Facebook deeply both here and abroad. /2
Report also spends time on content policy team reporting thru lobbying executives. Zuckerberg in leaked transcripts has said who helped him w shooting and looting “mistake” and it matched this chart (Sandberg, Clegg, Bickert, Kaplan). New sources confirm problems here. /3
Read 20 tweets
21 Feb
Sunday shows time, lots of topic medical people scheduled again 🙏🏽. First up, @CNNSotu. @DanaBashCNN did a really strong job pressing Dr Fauci with questions including schools, grandparents, duration of precautions and (he’ll also be on Meet the Press and Fox News Sunday).
Wow. I wish everyone could see this week’s @FoxNewsSunday if you stop and think about audience reached. Wallace did a remarkable interview on climate change with Gates posing doubts of his audience. @BillGates was a gracious, smart, transparent messenger, glad he made the time.
Then Wallace had Dr Fauci - recall for long time prior administration wouldn’t even let him on TV. Again, great interview. Value when Wallace presents conflicting video clips to his audience (being spread through right wing media) so that Dr Fauci can reconcile and clarify it.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!