Devastating report by @UNAMAnews on civilian harm in Afghanistan in 2020: unama.unmissions.org/sites/default/…
Despite the Feb 2020 deal, 3035 civilians were killed in 2020.
There was a 15% reduction in harm captured by killed+injuries year on year due to fewer complex attacks. But there was increase in other forms of violence, like targeted killings. Civilian casualties by Afghan security forces also increased.
There was extensive civilian harm in Q4 of 2020. It saw an increase from Q3 (out of line with historical trend) and 2019 Q4 level (for comparison, including resolute support’s recent chart).
Who was responsible for the civilian harm? 45% by Taliban, 22% by Afghan security forces, undetermined elements 9%, 8% by IS-KP.
30% of all civilian civilian casualties were children, 13% women:
How does the UNAMA reporting compare to US military and AIHRC’s reporting on civilian harm? In terms of civilians killed, UNAMA: 3035; Resolute Support: 2883; AIHRC: 2958.
I don’t have much to add other than the fact that civilian protection remains a disaster in Afghanistan. Really unfortunately, major constituencies in the US which should care don’t advocate enough on the issue or for that matter pay sustained attention to it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Asfandyar Mir

Asfandyar Mir Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @asfandyarmir

24 Feb
This is important on Taliban handling of foreign fighters, should be looked at carefully. But is it without precedent? I don't think it is. In fact, it is mostly in line with Taliban messaging on *controlling* foreign fighters over the last year or so. 1/4
A very useful resource on the issue is @franzjmarty's January piece looking at the Taliban's foreign fighter control & management activity. 2/4 globalaffairs.ch/2021/01/05/is-…
In the piece, @franzjmarty examines a Sept 2020 Taliban memo on "affairs of registering and controlling tribal refugees and foreign mujaheddin." He also discusses messages passed to foreign fighters, reportedly with al-Qaida, in Kamdesh, Nuristan. 3/4 globalaffairs.ch/2021/01/05/is-…
Read 4 tweets
24 Feb
“U.S. intelligence officials said Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups remain active threats inside Afghanistan. But they declined to comment about the Taliban's relationship with Al Qaeda.” nbcnews.com/politics/natio…
“Two Taliban commanders in Afghanistan acknowledged the presence of foreign fighters, but told NBC News that they had made it mandatory that all foreign militants, including members of Al Qaeda, not plan or execute any terrorist attack against the U.S.”
““It was quite before the Doha accord that we had drafted rules for the all 'foreign guests' staying in Afghanistan. Those who wanted to return to their native countries, we helped them,” a commander based in the southern province of Helmand province said.”
Read 4 tweets
23 Feb
Some important angles in this overview of resumption of talks in Doha by @Kathygannon: apnews.com/article/qatar-…
"While details of the meetings [in Doha] have been sketchy, Afghanistan featured prominently and officials familiar with the talks said a reduction of violence and eventual cease fire dominated discussions."
"Pakistan is seen as critical to getting the Taliban back to the table but also to pressing the insurgent movement __ whose leadership is headquartered in Pakistan __ to reduce violence in Afghanistan."
Read 6 tweets
23 Feb
This Dadullah interview recorded somewhere in one of the Waziristans and produced by al-Qaida's media arm As-Sahab is an old, among the crazy candid interviews by any Taliban leader that I have come across, especially on al-Qaida-Taliban ties.
From the same interview, Dadullah on how the Taliban treated/will treat foreign fighters:
The other interview which comes close to this in salience, if not in the quality of content, is a Siraj Haqqani "AMA" with the Ansar al-Mujahidin Network in April 2010.
Read 4 tweets
23 Feb
.@zalmayzia reports on the killing of 4 women aid workers in North Waziristan. nytimes.com/2021/02/22/wor…
"...four aid workers, all women, were killed and the male driver was wounded. A fifth aid worker, also a woman, survived the attack by taking refuge in a nearby house..."
"Frequent reports of targeted assassinations of tribal elders, roadside bomb attacks, and clashes with security forces have raised fears that the region...will relapse into militant control."
Read 6 tweets
20 Feb
.@IgnatiusPost travels with CENTCOM chief McKenzie to Islamabad, reports from there. washingtonpost.com/opinions/joe-b…
“McKenzie met Friday with Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff Gen. Qamar Javed Bajwa, who’s concerned about whether the new administration has a clear plan for what’s ahead in Afghanistan...”
“Pakistan’s military leaders “would not be unhappy” if the United States extended its departure date, one Pakistani military official said in an interview after the [Bajwa-McKenzie] meeting.”
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!