It's like all the worst opinions about journalism in one. First that scrutiny of government is somehow abusive. As if we should all be nicer and more trusting of the nice men who run the country.
Johnson has arguably the most compliant press of anyone I've ever seen in Downing Street. And it's still evidently not enough for him.
Second that political journalism is a kind of politics-for-people-who-can't-get-into-politics. A fundamental misunderstanding of really fucking basic professional and constitutional responsibilities.
I could add the third unspoken element, which is that Johnson as a journalist lied, over and over again, sometimes facing the consequences and often not. Then he imported that quality to the heart of government.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My mate's mum in Germany sent her granddaughter a dress she made and some little presents. The cost for this is now £23.54 on the recipient's side alone. Just one of those small lovely things which now come wrapped in cost, bureaucracy and hassle.
As my friend pointed out, this speaks to one of the under-discussed elements of Brexit: the increase of general faff. A further injection of pointless, boring, costly admin into lives which already have way too much of it.
We typically speak of the business-threatening faff: entry and exit clearance, safety and security documentation, SPS checks. And obviously that's the most important stuff, because it is costing people their livelihoods.
Starmer leadership: When you get past the noise, he continues to make the right calls at the right time politics.co.uk/week-in-review…
Btw I think part of the gap between Twitter assessments of Starmer and his actual record come down to gradualism. Twitter is very NOW NOW NOW YOU CUNT. Starmer's team are clearly working to a gradual phase-by-phase timetable to rebuild Labour's position.
I do get the frustration with that. Living with all this death as a direct product of government ineptitude. It makes my fucking blood boil. But then, that's one of the many reasons why I'd be a shit politician.
I'm so excited about this. Been waiting to announce it for ages. We're doing an evening with Harriet and John: the love story that made modern liberalism. eventbrite.co.uk/e/harriet-and-…
It's virtual, obvs, taking place on Thursday March 4th. Salon style event full of ROMANCE, DRAMA, BIG INTELLECTUAL BREAKTHROUGHS.
.@timatkin has generously given up his time to pair two bottles of wine with the event, selected to complement the life and work of Harriet and John. You can get them both through @davyswine at a special discount - link in the event blurb.
Rewatching the decent X-Men films because of, you know, *that* TV show.
Order: First Class, X-Men, X2, Last Stand, Days of Future Past (yes I know Last Stand isn't decent, but you need it to make sense of DoFP). I want to put Logan at the end, but it's such a downer after DofP.
Anyway, you know what? First Class really isn't that good. But watching it before X-Men really improves X-Men. Gives it all this weight and heritage you previously had to guess at. Makes the relationship between Xavier and Magneto much more emotional.
When you dig past all the 'war on woke' gibberish of the government's proposals, you get two concrete things. First, it wants to become directly involved in the assessment of valid speech in universities.
This elevates discussions about when legal speech should be stopped from the institutional level, where it is difficult, to the state level, where it is intolerable.