Thread by @mmpandit

Some people group Pushya 1 (Duryodhan’s refusal of peace) and Pushya 2 (Balarama’s pilgrimage) together and say that it’s like that.

What’s the easiest way to prove them wrong? (Answer also destroys the thesis of half a dozen astronomers)
Can anyone answer?
Take your time! 2wks

Actually I think the answer destroys the thesis of nearly every astronomer except in 3067BCE:
For reference, check the blog and think of the answer. It’s self apparent.
I will wait a few weeks and listen to your answers to this question.
astronomyofindia.wordpress.com/2020/06/29/bal…

The basic problem most theories fall into is confuse Pushya 2 (Balarama starts pilgrimage) for Pushya 1 (Duryodhan’s rejection of peace)
That demolishes the theory because the war timeline is tied to Balarama’s pilgrimage and a mistake of 27 days will finish war timeline as well.

It’s not just 5561BCE which falls into this situation. Virtually every other Mahabharata theory falls into this quicksand.
As @pranasutra ji demonstrated yesterday, the second Pushya must be happening at a separate time and place to the first Pushya.
No ambiguity!

There is so much detail in the Mahabharata text that one can see once one realises that the two Pushyas are happening in separate places and at separate times 27 days apart.
Imagine what happens when researchers confuse both Pushyas to be same?

So for those who confuse the two Pushyas together, the war timeline fails , the pilgrimage timeline fails, the Mission of Peace timeline fails and so does the Bhisma Moksha timeline.
Virtually all the researchers made this mistake!!