Yes. People should read David Icke.

The idea this is laughable to you is an amusing glimpse into your arrogance. He has his following for a reason, and is censored for a reason. He questions the status quo, and models that which make sense of it.

Unlike you, who caves to it.
Your arrogance (including calling be a "baby", and essentializing conspiracy theorists as "wackjobs") is further typified by assuming you know everything I've read and been through, all while claiming I "don't know half" of the other way around.


LMAO you think war is in one's "self interest"? Terrorism? Capitulation to tyranny? The global panopticon?

No. They must be evinced of this path. And you only assist these efforts by campaigning for warmongering "anti crime" people like Biden.


What's sad is people like you, who subsume themselves to the conspiracy while claiming to be above others, and hide behind various identities and structures as an excuse for it.

You're not above criticism, and people should read everyone. Alex Jones. You.
You have no meat on your bones at all. No proof for your claims, and only a shadow of a philosophy. You came onto the libertarian scene with the literal username "Leading Liberty™".

[citation needed]

People have to want to follow you. Nobody does.

As I've proven in this thread, you kneejerk to essentialism. You might not see it, but your whole ideological framework is bent around distilling someones' being down to an essence you can label and control, and you ought to watch more Peter Coffin.

"Essentialism is bad....

... We might feel good calling somebody bad for whatever thing that they do wrong, but here's the problem - you do something wrong. You don't know everything, you aren't right all the time, and that's not evil."
"Here's the key. People aren't just good or just bad. Everyone is a little of both. Some more of one than the other, sure, but never just one. People have reasons and justifications - they do things because they think it's the thing that makes the most sense."

Great vid/channel.
Notice how I say people should read Icke and listen to Jones, but I also promote Coffin? Notice how my prime motive is that someone has something valuable to say, not that I agree with all of it?

You can apply a similar mentality to a Biden vote, but not recommending an author.
Complaints are your social power. You have a lot of em, and few real solutions.

Your whole mindset is perpetuation of class divides and maintenance of status quo, so you'll have something to keep complaining about, and never lose social power.

It's pathetic, and leads nothing.
I, on the other hand, am willing to listen to everyone, and make thorough responses to what they say. I'm willing to take the good and leave the bad. You hate me because I'm what you aren't - tolerant, libertarian, and open-minded. I want this shit to stop. I'm going to make it.
This whole thread is based on you falsely attacking my valid point in an incredibly childish way, and then continuing to defend your naivete and lack of argument. I woke up to antagonistic comments you wrote - essentializing myself and many others. Your labels don't save you.
So you can falsely claim to lead liberty, while denigrating those who have led far more away from power than you ever will.

There's a reason my account has over 100 more followers in three months, than your 5 year old account.

People don't like their leaders assigned to them.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Jeremiah.exe

Jeremiah.exe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JeremiahEXE

22 Feb
No amount of "reading about relationship anarchy" will make me wrong about 1, 2, and 3, and you proved nothing in either your original tweet or this one.

You weren't censored, and blocking someone on Twitter is not censoring them. Stop promoting CSAM legalization, you cretin.
You adopt anarchist aesthetic, to paper over your desire to get away with unethical acts, while not seeing consequences for them. It's why you promoted Russia as an example of a sex-positive society; you don't actually have any interest in statelessness.
Nope. There's no "religious fundamentalism" in abstinence - the fact that people can do it for religious reasons is not evidence that all reasons are religious. Patriarchy doesn't exist, but calling me a conspiracy theorist while pushing that CT? Amusing.

Read 8 tweets
14 Feb
1) No, yes, yes. *built
2) No they aren't, and only if you want to.
3) Completely untrue, and a direct result of the media lying to you about it - as evidenced by "muh Twitter" when it's on all platforms.
4) And? What do you suggest replacing it with?

5) He was way better than you, and you have very limited "interesting bits", if any.
6) No.
7) The state agrees with and loves this take. Anarchists shouldn't.
8) Yes.
9) No. We should all get fit enough to destroy what destroys us, and not be unhealthy.
10) No it isn't, and fortunately, few people care what you think.
11) Vague statements like this are worthless and require no thought or knowledge.
12) Ancoms are libertarians, and political libertarianism started w/ ancoms. You diss libertarian org tho.

Read 8 tweets
16 Jan
Civilians need these for self defense against a variety of people.

We need them cause, even though the elites are pushing hard to make the whole world completely unfree, US isn't yet.


Your country arrests people for jokes and wrongthink, en masse - this one could not.
I get that you need to fearmonger, but the fact that you only included one real criminal in your post is telling.

So is the alarmism about the M134, a subject you clearly don't understand (next tweet).

This is why the UK should not be the US's standard.

One of the few which still exist, sure.

There are no M134s on the market right now, and acting like they're a dime a dozen is disingenuous, you hack.

Nobody is carrying one in a Chanel, and it requires expensive and heavy mounting to even use.

But OK.
Read 8 tweets
15 Jan

"Muh NAP" is not the basis of libertarianism, nor is abiding by it.

Certain thoughts can render one not libertarian, at a foundational level, without action, or rights violations, and simply "not violating rights" isn't the foundation of liberty or libertarianism.
The belief in free will, and the meritocratic notions which spring from anti-determinism - THE ORIGINAL MEANING OF LIBERTARIANISM - are the foundation, not muh NAP.

Believing one's value is determinist, and not by their will, is anti-liberty. Can't be anti-liberty libertarian.
Like even NAP as a phrase even came so long after political libertarianism. This isn't a thing. Even in American right-libertarianism, muh NAP ain't the root, and it got on fine without it for many years.

Libertarianism didn't poof into being when the NAP was coined. Ridiculous.
Read 7 tweets
13 Jan
Someone on Reddit wanted this. I coulda done better, but it was taking too long.… Image
Someone else asked for "da gren". Image
"Da pink" request. Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!