Yes. People should read David Icke.
The idea this is laughable to you is an amusing glimpse into your arrogance. He has his following for a reason, and is censored for a reason. He questions the status quo, and models that which make sense of it.
Unlike you, who caves to it.
The idea this is laughable to you is an amusing glimpse into your arrogance. He has his following for a reason, and is censored for a reason. He questions the status quo, and models that which make sense of it.
Unlike you, who caves to it.
https://twitter.com/ileadliberty/status/1364186816321060866
Your arrogance (including calling be a "baby", and essentializing conspiracy theorists as "wackjobs") is further typified by assuming you know everything I've read and been through, all while claiming I "don't know half" of the other way around.
Bougie.
Bougie.
https://twitter.com/ileadliberty/status/1364188948982099969
LMAO you think war is in one's "self interest"? Terrorism? Capitulation to tyranny? The global panopticon?
No. They must be evinced of this path. And you only assist these efforts by campaigning for warmongering "anti crime" people like Biden.
Shill.
No. They must be evinced of this path. And you only assist these efforts by campaigning for warmongering "anti crime" people like Biden.
Shill.
https://twitter.com/ileadliberty/status/1364189545483427842
What's sad is people like you, who subsume themselves to the conspiracy while claiming to be above others, and hide behind various identities and structures as an excuse for it.
You're not above criticism, and people should read everyone. Alex Jones. You.
You're not above criticism, and people should read everyone. Alex Jones. You.
https://twitter.com/ileadliberty/status/1364194161889542150
You have no meat on your bones at all. No proof for your claims, and only a shadow of a philosophy. You came onto the libertarian scene with the literal username "Leading Liberty™".
[citation needed]
People have to want to follow you. Nobody does.
[citation needed]
People have to want to follow you. Nobody does.
https://twitter.com/ileadliberty/status/1364194640560275458
As I've proven in this thread, you kneejerk to essentialism. You might not see it, but your whole ideological framework is bent around distilling someones' being down to an essence you can label and control, and you ought to watch more Peter Coffin.
https://twitter.com/ileadliberty/status/1364193529438867456
"Essentialism is bad....
... We might feel good calling somebody bad for whatever thing that they do wrong, but here's the problem - you do something wrong. You don't know everything, you aren't right all the time, and that's not evil."
... We might feel good calling somebody bad for whatever thing that they do wrong, but here's the problem - you do something wrong. You don't know everything, you aren't right all the time, and that's not evil."
"Here's the key. People aren't just good or just bad. Everyone is a little of both. Some more of one than the other, sure, but never just one. People have reasons and justifications - they do things because they think it's the thing that makes the most sense."
Great vid/channel.
Great vid/channel.
Notice how I say people should read Icke and listen to Jones, but I also promote Coffin? Notice how my prime motive is that someone has something valuable to say, not that I agree with all of it?
You can apply a similar mentality to a Biden vote, but not recommending an author.
You can apply a similar mentality to a Biden vote, but not recommending an author.
Complaints are your social power. You have a lot of em, and few real solutions.
Your whole mindset is perpetuation of class divides and maintenance of status quo, so you'll have something to keep complaining about, and never lose social power.
It's pathetic, and leads nothing.
Your whole mindset is perpetuation of class divides and maintenance of status quo, so you'll have something to keep complaining about, and never lose social power.
It's pathetic, and leads nothing.
I, on the other hand, am willing to listen to everyone, and make thorough responses to what they say. I'm willing to take the good and leave the bad. You hate me because I'm what you aren't - tolerant, libertarian, and open-minded. I want this shit to stop. I'm going to make it.
This whole thread is based on you falsely attacking my valid point in an incredibly childish way, and then continuing to defend your naivete and lack of argument. I woke up to antagonistic comments you wrote - essentializing myself and many others. Your labels don't save you.
So you can falsely claim to lead liberty, while denigrating those who have led far more away from power than you ever will.
There's a reason my account has over 100 more followers in three months, than your 5 year old account.
People don't like their leaders assigned to them.
There's a reason my account has over 100 more followers in three months, than your 5 year old account.
People don't like their leaders assigned to them.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
