1. Some legal-writing advice meant esp for first-gen law students.

College taught me that the key to good writing was originality. 1L-year exams taught me that sounding like a lawyer was about spotting every issue.

To become a good legal writer, I had to unlearn both lessons.
2. Good legal writing isn't about coming up with clever new ideas or expressing them in a unique new way. And it's nothing at all like an issue-spotting final exam.

Good legal writing is about clarity.
3. Once you figure out what your most important points are, your job—your only job, more or less—is to state them as clearly as possible.
4. If the most important points are perfectly obvious, that's perfectly fine. Your job really, truly is not to make other points that are creative or obscure instead or also. Your job is to make your important points clearly.
5. How to write clearly is a big topic of its own. It sounds simple but it's actually damn hard, not something anyone enters law school able to do.

My point here, the one it took me way too long to get, is that learning legal writing requires some unlearning first. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matthew Stiegler

Matthew Stiegler Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MatthewStiegler

22 Feb
Two maps of Philadelphia that made my head detonate.

On the left, covid vaccination rates. On the right, poverty rates. ImageImage
One graph of Philadelphia that made my detonated head detonate again. Image
Source for the Philly covid vaccination data is @PhiladelphiaGov's website. phila.gov/programs/coron…
Read 4 tweets
25 Jan
When McConnell does things like demand Ds honor R circuit blue slips in 2009 or demand Ds honor R filibusters in 2021, despite not doing those things for Ds when he was in power, the problem isn't hypocrisy. It's worse.

nytimes.com/2021/01/25/us/…
McConnell isn't failing to honor his own principles. McConnell's only guiding principle is "If the rules don't prevent it and it adds to GOP power, we'll do it." He's quite consistent about following it.
So when McConnell demands that Ds do this or that, he's simply try to keep Ds from using their power the way he uses his. And why not? It's always worked for him before.
Read 9 tweets
20 Jan
A strong opinion that many of my fellow progressives may strongly disagree with: Biden should put Orin Kerr, a fairly conservative Republican, on the Ninth Circuit.
Look, I anticipate spending the next 4 years mad at the Biden admin for being too timid with judicial nominations. I firmly believe Biden needs to play by the new rules, not the old ones. The days of Ds slowly nominating a bunch of mid-50s moderate prosecutors are over.
Big-picture, Biden's job is to unskew our Trump/Leo-skewed courts. In my view that means putting a lot of brilliant, dynamic, solidly progressive 30- and 40-something black women in circuit seats.
Read 11 tweets
9 Jan
There's growing willingness to acknowledge the ways in which Trump's work of building and clinging to power resemble Hitler's. Good.

But this week the history that keeps flashing in my mind isn't Nazi Germany, it's pre-WWII Japan's May 15 Incident.

A thread. 1/
Japan after WWI was a two-party parliamentary constitutional democracy. The government functioned reasonably well into the 30s, weathering the depression better than its peers in the US and Europe. 2/
But a right-wing anti-democratic cancer took root in the lower ranks of the Japanese military. This cancer led to Japan's invasion of Manchuria in 1931 and the assassination of a former cabinet minister in 1932. 3/
Read 13 tweets
8 Jan
IMPEACH HIM TODAY MOTHERFUCKERS

TODAY

TODAY

TODAY

TODAY

TODAY

TODAY

TODAY

TODAY

not the middle of next week

TODAY
Read 40 tweets
6 Jan
18 USC 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

"If two or more persons ... conspire

to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States

or

to levy war against them

or

...
... to oppose by force the authority thereof,

or

by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States,

or

by force to seize, take, possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof ...
... they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both."
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!