This is an extremely strange denial from Governor Cuomo. It ignores most of Lindsey Boylan's allegations, contradicts a claim that she didn't make, and offers a rebuttal from four staffers without so much as asserting that they're in a position to make such a rebuttal reliably.
Boylan makes a series of allegations against Cuomo today, and the only one his office denies specifically isn't close to being the most serious. And again, that one denial is highly misleading. medium.com/@lindseyboylan…
Cuomo's office says, as if it's somehow damning, that Boylan was never alone with Cuomo, a press aide, and a state trooper on a October 2017 flight. But she doesn't say she was, just that on the flight in question "His press aide was to my right and a state trooper behind us."
And the actual denial comes collectively from four individuals who say they were each on all of the relevant possible flights, but there's no indication of how they can be certain the Cuomo statement in question—just four words—was never uttered.
Was one or more of them seated next to Cuomo at all times? Or perhaps Boylan? Have they interviewed all relevant troopers and press aides? One would expect them to say so, if any of this were the case. But they don't.
Maybe it's just a rushed and poorly-worded statement, and a less obviously flimsy denial is forthcoming. But as it stands, it strikes me as more problematic than no denial at all.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I love Casablanca with all my heart, but one of the main characters is an unrepentant serial rapist, and the movie treats it as a charming foible. Deeply fucked up! Not for everybody!
The Apartment is a stone-cold gem, but also very much not for everybody, for a bunch of reasons. The Little Fugitive? Astonishingly good. Many would find it completely boring. And that's okay.
I listened to Limbaugh some when I was young. What leaps out in memory is how unreliable he was—how obvious it always was that he wasn't giving an honest account of his own views, never mind those of his enemies.
He was a bigot and a bully, yes. Always. But he was also a *panderer*, constantly, obsequiously flattering his audience while encouraging them to revile and disrespect those they disagreed with.
I’ve asked Byers to clarify, but as I read this tweet, it seems that Bret Stephens included an unredacted use of the n-word in his column this week to make a point, and the column got spiked—maybe as a result?
For context: In 2019, a Times reporter was reprimanded for several incidents of racial insensitivity on a trip with high school students, including one in which he used the n-word in a discussion of racial slurs.
You know what would be a great way for an outfit like @Slate to write about romance? Pair a romance reader with a romance skeptic, have the reader curate a novel for the skeptic to read, and run the conversation that ensues.
I've read a lot of romance novels for work and a fair number for fun, and you know what? The genre is VAST.
My favorite romance writer mostly sold her books to male-oriented pulp imprints, but the majority of them were lesbian romances set in the world of publishing and the arts in early-1960s Manhattan. And they're AMAZING.
If you're teaching college during the pandemic, it's really important to remember that some of your students may be in this situation, and that it's your job to lighten their load. nytimes.com/interactive/20…
And being there for students with childcare issues doesn't just mean responding well when they bring them up, because they may not trust you enough to bring them up. It means saying—and showing!—that you can be trusted to work with them from Day One.
It means telling them it's okay to leave their video cameras off. It means telling them they won't be penalized if they have to dip out of class. It means making class audio available. It means making it clear that you're not going to be upset if you hear a kid in the background.
We are witnessing the "I supported Dr. King" rewriting of history in real time.
BTW, I'm not arguing that Brooks is entirely wrong about opening schools here. (You can tell, because if I were making that argument, I'd be making it.) There ARE real costs to keeping schools closed—as many educators, parents, and advocates for kids have noted.