Aike P. Rots 🐋 Profile picture
Feb 25, 2021 14 tweets 4 min read Read on X
If an EU/EEA government (like Norway) closes its borders and prohibits non-resident EU citizens from entering, it violates our right of free movement. The problem is not obligatory testing and quarantine; it's that people are not allowed entry EVEN IF they test and quarantine.(1)
I am shocked by the ease and eagerness with which many Norwegian politicians, journalists and ordinary citizens accept this violation of the right of free movement. "Close the borders", people on the left and right have been shouting for months, and they got what they wanted. (2)
Norwegian news media have consistently portrayed Covid-19 as a "foreign" virus, "imported" into the country by migrant workers and tourists. Central to this frame are the widely used neologisms "importsmitte" (imported infections) and "innvandrersmitte" (migrant infections). (3)
In reality, as this graph shows, the number of people infected abroad has been relatively low for months. And as long as you have a functioning system for testing and quarantine, those few who test positive after entry will not infect others. (4) Image
"If we close the borders, infection rates will drop, and we can go back to normal" has been the dominant media frame for months. Guess what? Borders have closed, but infection rates are rising. Because the virus is circulating locally (graph showing the situation in Oslo). (5) Image
Millions of Europeans are dependent upon the right of free movement in the EU/EEA. For instance because we live in one country, but work in another. Until recently, this was no problem, and nobody expected this right to be revoked from us so suddenly. (6) nrk.no/osloogviken/sv…
Many of us have relatives or partners in other European countries. The Norwegian government does not allow EU parents to come visit their children if these are over 18. They do not allow grandparents or siblings to come. They do not even allow unmarried partners. (7)
On social media and in newspapers, there are many stories of people who are suffering because they cannot be together with their loved ones. This a powerful essay by a young woman about her experiences. Many of us depend on the right of free movement. (8) dagsavisen.no/debatt/stengt-…
Each government press conference, we are watching. Health minister @BentHHoyre has good news: old people may hug again! Then @Justisdep minister Monica Mæland tells us that borders will stay closed. No hugging for us who naïvely believed that we could live cross-border lives. (9)
For 10 years, I believed that most Norwegians were cosmopolitan and internationally oriented. After all the "close the borders" and "importsmitte" rhetoric, I am not sure anymore. I also believed the Norwegian state cares about international treaties and rights. I was wrong. (10)
Needless to say, this affects people's mental health. Norwegian colleagues assure me that they miss their parents too; that they haven't travelled home for months either. But if something serious were to happen, at least they have that possibility. We don't have that. (11)
I do expect borders to reopen by summer, at least within the Schengen zone. But I am worried about the precedent. Right-wing nationalists are getting what they have dreamed of for years: closed borders. What prevents them from doing this again, when a new opportunity arises? (12)
So who protects our right of free movement within the EU/EEA, if national governments don't do it, and EU institutions are too weak to enforce it? How can we be sure that, when the pandemic is behind us, we will be allowed free travel again? I have lost trust in the state. (13)
This thread got longer than I expected. Glad to see it is gaining attention and support. Just to repeat: I am in favour of obligatory testing and quarantine for those who come from regions with high infection. But if they meet those conditions, they should be allowed entry. (14)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aike P. Rots 🐋

Aike P. Rots 🐋 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AikeRots

Aug 26, 2022
This summer, I did research in Japan on whale festivals, rituals, and graves.🐳
Human-whale relations in Japan are historically characterised by great diversity. Whales have been seen as divine gifts, as natural resources, as gods, and as symbols of local or national identity.
🧵
In Japan, images of whales are everywhere. For instance here, in Yobuko, Saga prefecture (Kyushu) - a fishing town with a prominent whaling industry during the Edo period (17th-19th C). These two beautiful, brand-new whale floats are waiting for their first festival, this autumn.
Today, Yobuko is famous for squid; whaling ended a long time ago. But whaling heritage is celebrated as an important part of local identity. The former Nakao whaling guild residence is now a history museum. These beautiful scrimshaw show a dragon and the 7 gods of good fortune.
Read 38 tweets
Dec 8, 2021
Intriguing front cover: a shrine grove (鎮守の森) in the midst of a flood. Good visual metaphor: Shinto-derived aesthetic environmentalism doesn't help against climate change. The popular myth that Japanese traditional culture offers solutions for living sustainably is unfounded.
We all know what's needed: corporations must stop burning fossil fuels asap; national governments must stop subsidising them. #Japan is addicted to fossil fuels; its environmental track record is poor. #Shinto is aesthetically appealing, but useless in the face of climate change.
If you're interested in Shinto environmentalism and the significance (ecological/ideological) of sacred groves, please read my book. Spoiler alert: some interesting local initiatives, mostly of a symbolic nature; no meaningful action at the national level. bloomsbury.com/uk/shinto-natu…
Read 10 tweets
Jul 26, 2021
The World Heritage Committee of @UNESCO has its 44th meeting, hosted by Fuzhou (PRC) but taking place mostly online. It hasn't received as much media attention as previous meetings, but those of us who study the politics of heritage-making will follow it with great interest. (1)
Interesting that the WHC has decided to inscribe Amami-Oshima, Tokunoshima, Yanbaru forest (Okinawa) and Iriomote in the Ryukyu Islands (#Japan) as Natural World Heritage. A previous application was unsuccessful; the new one more convincing, apparently.(2) english.kyodonews.net/news/2021/07/f…
I grew up in the northeast of the Netherlands. I was happy to read that the Colonies of Benevolence (Koloniën van Weldadigheid) there have just been listed as World Heritage. A little-known early 19th-century social experiment to "eliminate poverty". (3) kolonienvanweldadigheid.eu/en/colonies-in…
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(