Let's be clear here. Labour can try to whitewash this as much as they like but it was them who brought companies like Serco into the wide range of public services STARTING with labours wonga for public services aka Public Finance Initiative!
In 2001, an IPPR Report on PFI recommended extending public-private partnerships into core public services such as health, education and local government.

IPPR was a new Labour think-tank.
This report was also supported by corporations with vested interests, such as Nomura, SERCO, Norwich
Union, General Health Care Group and KPMG et al.

Labour started it! The Tories expanded it!
Early PFI schemes, were primarily involved in construction and management. However, as construction is high risk and low margin, these companies rapidly realized that the larger and safer profits were to be made in providing servicing for large government contracts.
Consequently, such companies (for example
Jarvis, Atkins, Serco) began reinventing themselves as service providers, with expertise in health and education services.
It all started with Labour!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Martin J Keatings SNP 1 | AFI 2

Martin J Keatings SNP 1 | AFI 2 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MartinJKeatings

26 Feb
4 Years I have been waiting for a resolution to a complaint about denial of surgery on a technicality. A situation, I will say the ombudsman found in my favour and the NHS board concerned accepted that ruling.
It is now 1477 days since the original complaint was raised with the board. Over 1392 days since it was escalated to the SPSO, at which time MSP's lost the ability to advocate for me. (although some continued to do so).
Two health secretaries were fully aware. Including @JeaneF1freeman.

It took 645 days for the SPSO to investigate and to render a preliminary decision. A further 82 days for the final decision which the board accepted, even though it was later found they lied to the SPSO.
Read 23 tweets
24 Feb
So that's it. Mum finally got her first shot of vaccine today - and some very forward-thinking from the district nurse who knows I am a carer asked if I would I be willing to be on standby....
....to get my first shot of the vaccine in the event she couldn't get a hold of a number of patients, her returning at the end of a shift where that happens to vaccinate me in order to save doses going to waste! So of course I have said yes.
Of course the patients she couldn't get, would just get their vaccine the next day, but the point is she is trying to do anything to minimise dose wastage, which is projected to be as high as 5%.
Read 4 tweets
23 Feb
Because things are never as they seem. One has to ask if this entire NS/AS situation is actually a product of the crown to pit the yes movement against each other while also trying to take out both NS and AS, which when united in 2014 were a force to be reckoned with.
I say that as someone with direct experience of the Lord Advocate - who I can genuinely say I trust less than Harold shipman doing rounds on a COVID ward.
Perfect example, the "its not for the pursuer to stand in the shoes of parliamentarian" line. That appeared in arguments written for the Scottish Government (not parliament) but remember one important thing - The lord advocate was REPRESENTING BOTH.
Read 19 tweets
22 Feb
Important to note that had "parliamentarians" stood with #peoplesas30, this would have likely been granted. But seeing as though the SNP leadership have been whipping them from day one, not to get involved in a case that would prove THEIR bill lawful...well...you decide!
This leaves me with two choices-

1. Abandon the case to protect myself; or
2. Continue the case, risk losing and risk bankruptcy.
It's a big decision to make but I think it's going to have to be number 2, and if I am going to be forced to go down at the hands of Government for simply trying to ask a simple and reasonable question about our right to be fully informed before an election....
Read 6 tweets
22 Feb
Lord Malcolm has rejected our application for a protected expenses order again.

A few people asking what a protected expenses order is so allow me to explain.
We launched the people's action crowdfunder to raise funds to pay our lawyers. A protected expenses order limits liability for fees to the other side. In otherwords, if we win, the Governments would only be liable for a percentage of the fees.
This is good because it limits the fees that the taxpayer would have to fork out to us in a win. In other words, good fiduciary responsibility. At the same time. If we were to lose, it would limit my personal liability (because I am the named pursuer) for fees to the UK Gov.
Read 7 tweets
22 Feb
The Scottish Government had no involvement with the SNP's route map. In other words, NO SCRUTINY ON WHETHER IT WAS FACTUAL. And considering the lawfulness of that bill is one of two major matters in the #peoplesas30. We could tell that.
The #PeoplesAS30 is trying to establish that the Scottish Parliament has the power to hold a referendum without permission from Westminster. I have stated many times that this means also establishing the fact that they can pass the draft bill the SNP are proposing.
I also said that the SNP simultaneously claiming it was lawful, but then stating right at the back of it, that they expect a legal challenge shows us that they are not sure if it is or isn't lawful. Because you can't assert something to be lawful, and expect legal challenge.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!