4 Years I have been waiting for a resolution to a complaint about denial of surgery on a technicality. A situation, I will say the ombudsman found in my favour and the NHS board concerned accepted that ruling.
It is now 1477 days since the original complaint was raised with the board. Over 1392 days since it was escalated to the SPSO, at which time MSP's lost the ability to advocate for me. (although some continued to do so).
Two health secretaries were fully aware. Including @JeaneF1freeman.
It took 645 days for the SPSO to investigate and to render a preliminary decision. A further 82 days for the final decision which the board accepted, even though it was later found they lied to the SPSO.
It has now been 665 days of non-compliance with that ruling.
The health secretary will not step in, because the SPSO must issue a "special report". But what you don't know is that the health secretary knows....
...the SPSO has never issued a section 16 special report in its 20 year history.
In december 2019, the board told the SPSO it would not be compliant with the ruling. It took the SPSO 5 months to write the board. (COVID got the blame). Now I wont, at this point try to tell you what she said. I'll just let you see for yourself.
Pay special attention to the bits in orange. The redactions are just to protect staff named in the letter.
That's a letter from an ombudsman telling them that they are still non-compliant with a ruling they agreed with. It's a threat to implement a special report to parliament. We're now in April, 3 weeks after the 4th anniversary of this complaint.
June, July, August, September, October, November, December, January, February. 9 Months after the SPSO made this threat - still no action. And still no action from the health secretary because....you guessed it! She washes her hands because of no special report.
A tidy little arrangement.
Well! Enough is enough! I've given the health secretary until parliament rises to fix this, and if she doesn't, I'm going to start showing people exactly what has happened over the 4 years by releasing the documents.
Regardless of the situation with myself. If this crap is happening to me, then it is happening to others. This is the medical decline of individuals due to the inadequacies of Government policy. COVID doesn't factor here.
The board concerned was non-compliant for 9 months before the pandemic even started!
The SPSO is a useless, spineless department which seems more interested in kissing the backsides of public services engaged in wrongdoing.
In my case, application of a rule which should never have been applied to me, because that rule is intended for people who do not share my medical issues. It's like following rules for the able-bodied for someone with M.S or cancer. The two are not compatible!
This is a systemic failure of national policy, not merely maladministration - and it wouldn't be so bad, but the very same people responsible for this crap were then emboldened to refuse a second opinion for my mother who was in hospital for 11 months....
...after a 5 month fight to get that second opinion - it transpired that I was actually right, but not about the surgery - about the fact that they didn't have empirical data to support their assertions - and I know that because the findings of the second opinion found...
...THAT THE SURGERY WE WERE FIGHTING FOR HER WAS UNNECESSARY BECAUSE THEY'D ACCIDENTALLY MISDIAGNOSED HER WITH CANCER.
Put simply. I'm no longer willing (because I have given all of these departments 4 years of trying to let the system correct itself) to sit on my hands. So I have advised Jeane Freeman she has until the end of this parliamentary term to fix this mess...
....or I am going to start making some very uncomfortable truths (which I have withheld for the good of the cause) public. This is no longer about a simple complaint. It is now about serious medical consequences of incompetence....
...namely that I am now losing fine motor function in my hand, have my throat and lungs burnt by acid daily (which is why those of you who hear me talk now have noticed my voice is distinctively more husky) and I am now having to go for a cardiac appointment...
...because I am having problems with my blood pressure.
In otherwords, I now officially deam these failed policies as a serious and substantive threat to life, and I shall respond to that with extreme prejudice with every legal means at my disposal.
Oh! And I am also now calling for a formal review of the efficacy of the @SPSO_Ombudsman which is slated for petitioning to parliament immediately after the election.
The long and the short, as I said, is that if this is happening to me, it is happening to others. For me, it is a detriment to my health and likely the shortening of my lifespan - for someone else it could result in their death. Enough of the bu**shit. Time to grow a spine!
Let's be clear here. Labour can try to whitewash this as much as they like but it was them who brought companies like Serco into the wide range of public services STARTING with labours wonga for public services aka Public Finance Initiative!
In 2001, an IPPR Report on PFI recommended extending public-private partnerships into core public services such as health, education and local government.
IPPR was a new Labour think-tank.
This report was also supported by corporations with vested interests, such as Nomura, SERCO, Norwich
Union, General Health Care Group and KPMG et al.
So that's it. Mum finally got her first shot of vaccine today - and some very forward-thinking from the district nurse who knows I am a carer asked if I would I be willing to be on standby....
....to get my first shot of the vaccine in the event she couldn't get a hold of a number of patients, her returning at the end of a shift where that happens to vaccinate me in order to save doses going to waste! So of course I have said yes.
Of course the patients she couldn't get, would just get their vaccine the next day, but the point is she is trying to do anything to minimise dose wastage, which is projected to be as high as 5%.
Because things are never as they seem. One has to ask if this entire NS/AS situation is actually a product of the crown to pit the yes movement against each other while also trying to take out both NS and AS, which when united in 2014 were a force to be reckoned with.
I say that as someone with direct experience of the Lord Advocate - who I can genuinely say I trust less than Harold shipman doing rounds on a COVID ward.
Perfect example, the "its not for the pursuer to stand in the shoes of parliamentarian" line. That appeared in arguments written for the Scottish Government (not parliament) but remember one important thing - The lord advocate was REPRESENTING BOTH.
Important to note that had "parliamentarians" stood with #peoplesas30, this would have likely been granted. But seeing as though the SNP leadership have been whipping them from day one, not to get involved in a case that would prove THEIR bill lawful...well...you decide!
1. Abandon the case to protect myself; or 2. Continue the case, risk losing and risk bankruptcy.
It's a big decision to make but I think it's going to have to be number 2, and if I am going to be forced to go down at the hands of Government for simply trying to ask a simple and reasonable question about our right to be fully informed before an election....
Lord Malcolm has rejected our application for a protected expenses order again.
A few people asking what a protected expenses order is so allow me to explain.
We launched the people's action crowdfunder to raise funds to pay our lawyers. A protected expenses order limits liability for fees to the other side. In otherwords, if we win, the Governments would only be liable for a percentage of the fees.
This is good because it limits the fees that the taxpayer would have to fork out to us in a win. In other words, good fiduciary responsibility. At the same time. If we were to lose, it would limit my personal liability (because I am the named pursuer) for fees to the UK Gov.
The Scottish Government had no involvement with the SNP's route map. In other words, NO SCRUTINY ON WHETHER IT WAS FACTUAL. And considering the lawfulness of that bill is one of two major matters in the #peoplesas30. We could tell that.
The #PeoplesAS30 is trying to establish that the Scottish Parliament has the power to hold a referendum without permission from Westminster. I have stated many times that this means also establishing the fact that they can pass the draft bill the SNP are proposing.
I also said that the SNP simultaneously claiming it was lawful, but then stating right at the back of it, that they expect a legal challenge shows us that they are not sure if it is or isn't lawful. Because you can't assert something to be lawful, and expect legal challenge.