"Of course it is incredibly unnerving when people accuse me of being “invasive” or “breaking their trust” for using [spy pixels], but that is not my intention. For me, it seems a smart way to do business." WTF??independent.co.uk/life-style/ema…
"She asked me: 'Do you not think it is incredibly invasive and encroaching for you to know how many times I read your emails?'.. But I kept using it.. Then a former teacher accused me of “intruding in her personal life” for using it. neither of these were enough to deter me" 😮
So you spy on someone, you get caught spying, the victim of your spying explains why its hurtful and harmful, and you just carry on.. because.. that's what you want? That's some seriously sociopathic behavior.
Also, would @Independent let a real-world stalker publish stories about the women they had stalked, how stalking is actually good if you need to know where someone goes, and how not even the pleas of victims would make them stop? Just. Wat.
But also, who feels good about making tools that enable these fucking creeps? How can you work on Superhuman or Mailspring or Streak knowing that you're arming these stalkers with the tools to do their business? We fundamentally need a reset in the industry about spy pixels.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
