Acting Capitol police chief Pittman says 35 officers are under investigation for things like posing for selfies with Jan. 6 rioters, and six have had their police powers suspended.
Pittman says “well in excess” of 10,000 people left Trump’s speech near the White House on Jan. 6 and went to the Capitol. She estimates about 800 made it inside the building.
A perplexing story is coming out about an FBI report sent to Capitol police one day before the riots showing social media posts calling for war. "Congress needs to hear glass breaking, doors being kicked in, and blood from their BLM and Pantifa slave soldiers being spilled.”
Per Pittman, the document was sent to FBI agents embedded with the Capitol police. They sent it to an officer in the protective and operations side of House security. This person did not send the report up the chain.
“That is a lesson learned,” said Pittman.
BUT Pittman says even if police leadership did see the report it wouldn’t have made any difference — “We do not believe that that document in and of itself would have changed our posture” — because it was consistent with social media posts they’d already seen.
An exasperated Rep. Tim Ryan asks why they weren’t prepared for the worst-case scenario.
Pittman says they were “already leaning forward” in terms of calling in more officers, expanding the perimiter.
Obviously it wasn’t near enough.
“Hindsight is 2020,” says Pittman.
Wow. It’s coming up on two months since the Capitol siege and Capitol police haven’t held a single press conference. Asked by Jennifer Wexton if they’ll commit to facing the press/public in the future, Pittman says no.
So the operating belief of Capitol Police leadership after a disastrous and historic failure is that they have no obligation to show their faces and take questions about what went wrong (unless Congress calls them to a committee; then they have no choice.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Senate Administration committee hearing on the Jan. 6 riots kicks off with a first-person account from Capitol Police Capt. Carneysha Mendoza, who described rioters firing CS gas in the Capitol. “I received chemical burns to my face that still have not healed to this day.”
Of all the days she worked, Mendoza calls the 6th “by far the worst of the worst. We could have had ten times the amount of people working with us and I believe the battle would have been just as devastating."
Acting DC Metropolitan Police Chief Robert Contee III says DC police had intel that violence could be expected throughout the city after the Jan 6 gathering and the force was fully staffed, along with 300 members of the DC national guard deployed. But it wasn’t enough.
Today we saw dozens of videos/tweets of Trump saying the election was stolen and the electoral college count needs to be stopped, urging supporters to “fight like hell” and “stop the steal,” then people storming the Capitol repeating those lines. How are Republicans reacting?
Pretty much everyone has said the footage of the attack shown today is awful, reprehensible, traumatizing, etc. But many are saying that the responsibility is solely on the rioters, not Trump.
Sen. James Lankford on Trump’s culpability: “He's had 100 rallies and we have never seen that before. So that's the tough one to be able to link together.”
On day 2 of Trump’s impeachment trial begins with Rep. Jamie Raskin laying out Trump’s tweets calling people to DC on Jan. 6, then telling a crowd of supporters that day to “fight like hell or you’re not going to have a country anymore."
Raskin: “He told them to fight like hell and they brought us hell on that day.”
Raskin says for hours Trump did nothing to call off the mob once the Capitol attack started. “He watched it on tv like a reality show. He reveled in it. He did nothing to help us.”
Raskin closing: “Can our country and our democracy ever be the same if we don’t hold accountable the person responsible for inciting the violent attack against our country, our Capitol, our democracy and all of those who serve us so faithfully and honorably. Is this America?”
Republican Senator Bill Cassidy blasts the performance of Trump’s lawyers today: "It was disorganized, random. They talked about many things but they didn’t talk about the issue at hand… The House managers made a compelling, cogent case and the president’s team did not.”
Cassidy switched from his previous position and voted that the trial is constitutional. Longer quote:
“Anyone who listened to those arguments, the House managers were focused, they were organized, they relied upon both precedent, the constitution, and legal scholars...
...President Trump’s team were disorganized, they did everything but to talk about the question at hand, and when they talked about it they kind of glided over it almost as if they were embarrassed of their arguments.
And here we go, arguments in Trump’s second impeachment trial in the Senate are beginning.
Rep. Jamie Raskin, the lead House impeachment manager, assures senators they won’t have to listen to lectures about the Federal Papers because his case will be based on “cold, hard facts"
Raskin kicks off by showing a supercut of rioters storming the Capitol on Jan. 6 spliced with Trump talking about how the election was a fraud. “If you don’t fight like hell you’re not going to have a country anymore” etc. I’d expect to see a lot of this.
With Joe Biden (and, uh, Mitt Romney) proposing to send out direct cash payments to parents, there’s a pretty direct parallel we can look to to see what the impact would be — Canada!
Biden’s proposing to give parents $3,600 per child under the age of six, as well as $3,000 per child aged 6-17.
This is almost exactly the same program as the Canada Child Benefit introduced in 2016.
The Canda Child Benefit is more generous (around $6,700 for young kids per year, $5,700 for older kids) but has basically the same structure, including phasing out for higher-income families. So how did it go?