(Thread) Lies, Liars, and the Capitol Riot

This is #7 in my video series:

If you’re like me and you prefer to read, here it is on a Twitter thread.

Lying and presenting myths as a way to solidify power goes all the way back to the ancient world.

1/
Take the Behistun Inscription.

In huge lettering on the side of a cliff, King Darius, who was born in 522 BCE, presented the story of his life. mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah/Persia/…

If you believe him, power was given to him by the gods and he never suffered a single defeat.

2/
Moreover, he single-handedly killed anyone who dared question his authority. Scholars call this a pseudo-autobiography.

Donald Trump came to power with a pseudo-biography, which went like this: “I am a successful businessman.”

3/
Of course, if that were true, he wouldn’t be hiding his taxes and financial information.

Another form of ancient lie is what one ancient leader called “concealed wars.”

Let’s go back to the Mauryan Empire in India.

4/
The founder of the Mauryan Empire had a prime minister, Kautilya, who wrote a manual on how to use lies to win wars.

He talked about “concealed wars” as opposed to “open wars.”

An open war is when two armies meet on the battlefield and have it out.
columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pri…

5/
6/ Kautilya told the king that open wars are a bad idea. Your own people can die. Heck, you can die.

Concealed wars are when you spread lies to beat your enemies. This is safer and easier.

He gave examples of how to do this.

6/
For example, figure out how to get an undercover spy to spread the rumor that their king is cheating his top ministers.

If you’re lucky one of them might even be driven to assassinate the king and then throw their kingdom into chaos.

7/
Think how much easier that is than trying to kill your enemy king in an open war.

A Soviet Union spy manual bragged that Russians had invented and perfected the art of disinformation.

Interestingly, that claim is a piece of disinformation, told for a purpose.

8/
By the way, I know these things because I have a book coming out on disinformation so I had to do a lot of research.

The point is that using lies as a way to weaken and destroy an enemy, and build up your own power, goes back a long way.

9/
Disinformation is used by people who are trying to consolidate power, which is exactly what the Republican Party is trying to do.

I’ve said that oligarchs and would-be oligarchs have a problem: If they are trying to consolidate their own power and maintain a hierarchy. . .

10/
. . . with themselves at the top, they have to enact policies that hurt their own constituents.

So what do they do? They lie. They invent enemies who are trying to upset the order and destroy and take what belongs to ‘real’ Americans (who are of course, white).

11/
People who are lying on purpose in order to gain power are not going to stop.

People believe lies for all kinds of reasons. The lie can make them feel good. The lie might reinforce their worldview.

12/
Trump told his base that they are the "real Americans" and they would be at the top of the hierarchy except for people taking what belongs to them. This made them feel good.

(Most of us don't consider these guys the top of any hierarchy)

13/
Sarah Huckabee Sanders explained that Trump’s lies pointed to an "important truth."
An example: Birtherism was a provable lie, but pointed to what Trump’s base sees as an "important truth": Obama is Black. He’s not a real American.

14/
Some people embrace the lies because the lies destroy, and they want to destroy.

I wrote about that in 2018, here: slate.com/news-and-polit…

15/
Some people caught in these cults hard to reach. Some are your own family members. Cult specialists have ideas for reaching them.

Psychologists tell us that mocking them will not help.

The best strategy is to outnumber them at the polls.

16/
Right now, one of the best vehicles we have for reaching them is the criminal investigations into the Capitol Riot because the people who participated were deep in these conspiracy theories.

I’m reading their pretrial motions, and some are realizing they were duped.

17/
That's why I'm watching these investigations closely. I also think that defamation lawsuits can help dissuade those who are lying on purpose.

In the end, there will always be liars who cynically lie to gain power.

18/
There will also be people who believe the lies because they want to believe the lies, and people with cognitive limitations, who I believe we should think of as victims.

Another strategy is how to respond to the lies, but that's a big topic, so I'll save it for another day.

19/
I think disinformation is the greatest threat to democracy. As our friend Kautilya explained, it's easy and much safer than violent coups.

Fascism is based on lies. Rule of law requires truth (I talked about this in video #6)

They can't coexist.


20/
The Internet makes it much easier to spread disinformation and harder to control.

The most important thing we can do is educate people. If you have teenagers (particularly boys) online, teach them to spot a person trying to radicalize them.

21/
Speaking of teenagers, mine is looking at superfun videos.

Me: "You don't think informational videos on the history of disinformation are fun?"

Teenager offers one of those teenager-special-level-stares. Almost an eye-roll, but more effective.
There are probably some who are so far gone that they'll think the courts, judges, juries, and police are all in a grand conspiracy to get them to lie and say that they were duped.

I think enough, though, will see the light and tell their friends.
There was a thread making the rounds, I think by a psychologist, on how to innoculate teenage boys from people online trying to radicalize them.

I googled and found this: teachingwhilewhite.org/blog/2020/4/13…

Don't get me wrong. When I say, "enough" I don't mean "enough to solve the problem" I mean "enough to make a dent and help."

We outnumber them anyway, so any pieces of their base that we chip off and splinter helps.
I put this one on my blog, here: terikanefield-blog.com/lies-liars-and…

Don't you get the feeling that for some of these guys, some of their frustration is because nice girls don’t like them?
Me too, but I totally understand the people who prefer videos. Once I got used to talking at a camera, they're easy.


I didn't thread the earlier ones because I've done threads on them. I'll attach a link to transcripts for each. See the next tweet.
Link to transcriptions: terikanefield-blog.com/youtube/ All seven are transcribed here.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

27 Feb
Several people recently have used the phrase "broken system."

I'm curious about the thinking behind this term. It seems to me as flawed as MAGA.

Broken implies that it was once functional and working, now then it broke.

Two questions . . .
(1) Was it ever not broken?
(2) If so, when did it break?
In 1870, women couldn't vote.

In many states, they couldn't own property.

It was perfectly legal to have all-white juries, and they often were all white.

There were no worker protections or consumer protections.

Read 20 tweets
27 Feb
All we are seeing so far are pretrial motions for release pending a trial. A judge decides (no jury).

The judge isn't considering a defense to the actual crime or deciding whether a person is guilty.

There are particular factors a judge considers. . .

1/
Incarcerating someone after arrest but before a trial is somewhat problematic because of that whole innocent-until-proven-guilty thing.

If a person is nonviolent and not a flight risk, the person shouldn't be imprisoned without a trial.

2/

justice.gov/archives/jm/cr… Image
One consideration is the probability that the defendant will be convicted and face jail time because otherwise, you run the risk of ruining an innocent person's life.

(A jailed person probably loses his or her job. What if there are kids to support, etc.)

3/ Image
Read 4 tweets
26 Feb
I remember when Roger Stone was greeted with a standing ovation after Mueller indicted him.

We shouldn't be surprised that the Republican Party will cheer Trump, despite the role he played in the insurrection.

1/

thehill.com/blogs/blog-bri…
The goal of the GOP is to dismantle the federal government and return to that time (before 1920; for others, before 1860) when white men could basically do what they wanted.

On the frontier, they could grab land!
Before modern rape laws, they could grab women!

2/
Before the alphabet-soup regulatory agencies (the "deep state") they could cheat!
🔹They could fix prices and manipulate markets!
🔹They could sell rotten goods and it was the buyer's fault for not inspecting better!
🔹They could pollute rivers!

🎶Those were the days🎶

3/ Image
Read 4 tweets
26 Feb
Gideon v. Wainwright, 1963, held that all defendants in criminal matters are entitled to a court-appointed lawyer if they cannot afford one.

Do you want to go back to the days when poor people went from accusation to prison on a conveyor belt, but the rich had good lawyers?
Mr. Gideon was a poor man accused of theft. He represented himself because he couldn't afford a lawyer. He was convicted. He appealed to the Supreme Court on a handwritten letter from prison. The Court heard his case and held that poor people get court-appointed lawyers . . .
. . . he had a new trial with a local lawyer who understood how the false accusation happened. The lawyer did some investigating, presented facts that Gideon has been unable to obtain, and Gideon was acquitted.
Read 6 tweets
24 Feb
A little history.

Our current criminal justice system took form after the Civil War, when the reactionaries and White Supremacists found a way around the Thirteenth Amendment, which prohibited slavery except in the case of punishment for crimes after conviction.
1/
The solution: Convict lots of Black men, put them in jail, and put them in chain gangs. At the time, there were no limits on what police could do.

So they often beat confessions out of innocent Black men.

Along came Charles Hamilton and his protégé Thurgood Marshall.

2/
As a result of literally decades of work (and one of the few times we had a liberal Supreme Court under Earl Warren), we got rulings that the Fourth Amendment outlaws things like beating confessions out of people.

It was a step forward.

3/
Read 9 tweets
24 Feb
The conspiracy theory folks and white supremacists are not going away.

The people who naturally dislike democracy and diversity are not going away.

They need a party, and they need a leader. Trump will remain their guy.
If we're lucky, Trump will be politically bankrupt with at least 60% of the people, which is not enough for the crazies to seize the government, but enough for them to remain dangerous.
Prison will not matter to them. Why would it? His followers do not live in a world of facts. They will see him as a victim.

Imprisoning leaders never breaks up a movement.

I'd hope it would cause him to lose credibility with at least 60% of voters.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!