Share this page!

Ted McCormick Profile picture
Twitter logo
25 Feb, 4 tweets, 1 min read
since money is a social construct, how come I can't choose how much I have???
the only way out is to admit that money was created just moments after the Big Bang, checkmate postmodernists
unironically lmao at the replies implying "social construction" was invented by some entity called "The Woke"
tfw simple Logic proves that I can change my nationality (socially constructed) more easily than my hair colour (natural) Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Ted McCormick

Ted McCormick Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mccormick_ted

Ted McCormick Profile picture
27 Feb
Wow. "Anti-Wokeism" is tearing itself apart with tone policing, ideological purity tests, and cancellation Image
who could have seen this coming from people who think scanning texts for "postmodern" vocabulary is intelligent criticism
Anyway Young does indeed appear more concerned with Conversationalist James's hectoring tone and pandering manner than with the fact that he is a fraud who makes things up, so a plague on both your houses, etc, etc
Read 4 tweets
Ted McCormick Profile picture
26 Feb
The last point is key and often gets lost. Running universities as brands first and academic institutions second will *always* mean sacrificing academic freedom to PR.
"Running it like a business" is antithetical to running it like a university.
Gauging concern about how and in what interests universities are actually run (as opposed to safe spaces, trigger warnings, etc) is, in my experience, a good way to tell who is concerned about academic freedom and who just wants to find the quickest way to shut other people up.
Read 4 tweets
Ted McCormick Profile picture
25 Feb
it's like watching someone turn into James Lindsay by choice
step 1: define your political opponent as bad, make up a term for them that underlines the imputed badness, but let the idea that the term is a neutral analytical one persist
step 2: appeal to common sense/intuition/reasoning as fact (without any real work to show why the point is in fact intuitive or reasonable, let alone factual)
Read 12 tweets
Ted McCormick Profile picture
24 Feb
Introductions and summaries have their place but "don't try to read the primary texts, you won't understand them and it will frustrate you," besides being patronizing, is bad advice.

Reading widely and talking with other people, formally or informally, is often a good idea.
Part of the value of primary texts is that they have been and still are open to different readings. Substituting a summary -- as opposed to using one as a help -- closes off that engagement. If you are curious about the ideas in the first place, why would you want to do that?
I also find that moving from incomprehension to (greater) understanding by working through texts or other primary material -- with helps, by all means! -- is a good part of the value of reading and indeed of education in general. Why would I want to short-circuit that?
Read 4 tweets
Ted McCormick Profile picture
24 Feb
These days you get arrested and thrown in jail if you say you're a historian of science or medicine
This is the real reason I haven't been back to the UK in a few years. Outstanding warrant for a tweet about air pumps
hilarious
Read 4 tweets
Ted McCormick Profile picture
24 Feb
So, in sum, a school district made material available and Counterweight helped get it removed and replaced. "Extreme" is vague rhetorical garnish.

I don't see how this is more than an ideological pressure group -- which is fine, but has nothing to do with protecting free speech.
I mean, the whole point is explicitly to make things they don't agree with harder for people to access. The comments congratulate them on rolling back CRT "implementation", but that's a red herring -- by their own account, the only "implementation" was making material available.
Again -- if you want to be an ideological pressure group that agitates for school boards to replace things you don't like for ideological reasons with things you do, OK. That's your right. But to pretend this is about promoting free speech or debate is silly. It's clearly not.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @mccormick_ted has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @mccormick_ted!

Read all threads by @mccormick_ted