How to choose a publisher when you think your book could fit at multiple places?
One thing to think abt is the audiences you’re most keen to reach. Which press has the best reputation among the people you *most* want to read your book?
The people you care most about reaching might be people in your home field or subfield. For ex, if you’re going up for tenure & need to “make an impact” in the field of your home dept, you might decide to pick the press that looks best to yr senior colleagues. But—
Maybe you’ve written an interdisciplinary book and you’re already pretty well connected & visible in one of the fields yr intervening in. In that case maybe go for a press that has the visibility & marketing channels in the field you’re less known in but want to be respected in
You’re going to have to do a lot of the promotion for the book anyway. It’s worth considering a press that can make up for the gaps in yr own platform & vice versa.
(Some presses are known to do very little promotion. Don’t pick those presses unless you have no choice)
I know it can be hard for ECRs to know which presses have what reputations in what fields. It’s one of those cultural capital / hidden curriculum things, and there isn’t, like, some guide somewhere. You learn it by talking to people. So start talking to ppl abt it!
There is the Association of University Presses Subject Area Grid, which can be useful ( aupresses.org/resources/aupr…). But it will tell you who publishes in which areas, not their reputations in those areas. That’s a matter of perception, so you’ve got to talk to the perceivers
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's totally normal for academic book writers to struggle w/ organizing their material into chapters that make sense and propel readers thru the book. It's tricky when yr trying to revise a diss & maybe equally tricky when yr on a 2nd book w/o a pre-existing structure in place
What isn't super compelling, structurally, is dividing the book up into 4-5 case studies & just showing how yr main argument or concept plays out in each case. Why wd a reader spend sustained time w/ yr bk if they can get the gist from just 1 chapter? Here's how to do it better:
The 4-5 case studies or research sites/objects isn't the problem. It's that each successive one should show the reader something new, something that enhances or complicates the concept or thesis introduced in the first chapter
This week’s newsletter covered some of the salient differences between scholarly publishers & trade publishers
Quick answer comes down to audiences & sales channels. Trade presses sign books they think will sell widely via retail. Schol presses less likely to stress mass appeal
There are scholarly presses that are not-for-profit (e.g. university presses) and scholarly presses that are “commercial” or for-profit.
Commercial is not synonymous with “trade”
Trade = sold to retailers at a deep discount in hopes of getting books placed on shelves and in front of a broad audience of readers.
Not-for-profit presses may decide to market some books as trade titles, if they see sales potential
Because this is always a burning question for first-time academic book authors, here are some red flags that the book you’re proposing hasn’t yet evolved away from the dissertation:
🚩 You’re trying to make all the claims and cover all possible aspects of your topic.
Compelling books usually make one main argument and see that argument through multiple angles or layers in the chapters. They don’t exhaust all possible interest areas of a given subject
🚩 You’re still focusing inward on the specific procedures and findings of your research.
You do need to communicate what you found and how, but it should be in the interest of illuminating some broader dynamic in the world, because that’s what readers will care most about
You don’t have to be a social media wizard to publish a scholarly book.
But if you do want to use social media to build platform (I.e. the ability to reach your likely readers directly), it’s much more effective to start years before your book’s release
People who start being active just in time for their book’s release aren’t doing anything wrong but they probably aren’t selling a lot of books that way. More useful when someone starts using social media to talk about their work in process, to bring readers along for the trip
Look at it less as sales work and more as helping people become invested in the same questions you’re invested in (which you’ll provide answers to in the book that you will eventually publish and they will then want to read)
Here’s what you’ll need to prepare if you want to pitch yr academic book project to a publisher this year:
1. A working title for the book. Don’t worry, you can change it later.
2. A project description or overview. Summarize your main argument, how you prove it, why it matters
3. A description of yr intended audience. Don’t get too complicated. A simple, clearly targetable audience is better than like 10 different possible readerships
4. A brief discussion of other bks that share a topic, approach, or audience with yrs. They don’t have to be identical
5. A projected table of contents + summaries of every chapter you plan to include. These can change later too, but make sure you have a clear rationale for why every chapter needs to be there
This is a thread for ppl who just finished their dissertation & want to turn it into a book. 1st, congrats, you’ve completed one the hardest projects (maybe the hardest) you’ll ever do in your life. Recognize this accomplishment & don’t discount it by thinking yr diss is trash
The first thing u shd do is TAKE A BREAK. If u can manage it, stop working on scholarly stuff altogether for a few wks. I know it feels like yr already behind but recharging will make u more effective later & above that u deserve to get in touch with other things that bring u joy
It’s crucial to get distance from the diss work. You can do a lot to work toward your book *while also* keeping away from the diss itself. Here are 6 things you can do: