New from me at @ArcDigi: There's a war being waged right now on left-wing speech. In state houses across the country, GOP legislators are voting on bills that would muzzle professors, censor students, and destroy academic freedom.
In Georgia, a state rep has ordered universities to report back to him with a list of every course in which faculty discuss concepts like "privilege" or "oppression". Profs say it's already having a chilling effect.
Arkansas reps want to ban universities from offering any course, class, event, or activity that "promotes division between, resentment of, or social justice for" a race, gender, political affiliation, or social class.
South Dakota has a bill that would bar schools from using any content “associated with efforts to reframe this country’s history in a way that promotes racial divisiveness and displaces historical understanding with ideology.”
In North Dakota, there are two bills. One would roll back academic free speech. The other would disqualify from a key state grant program any university that partners with an abortion provider.
2) Force schools to give parents a week's notice before asking their kids their preferred pronoun (they'd also be required to relay the answer to the parents);
Again, these are just *some* of the bills out there right now. You'd have to be blind not to see what's happening. You'd have to be a hypocrite to be cool with it.
Where is the free speech commentariat in all this? Largely absent from the scene, I'm afraid to say. There are a lot of possible reasons for this, none especially exculpatory. But you'll need to read the piece to see why.
Regardless, this ought to be a gut check moment for the militant anti-woke movement. I don't know what turned you against free speech. Maybe it's the iPhones. Maybe it's social media. Or maybe your generation just never learned the values of classical liberalism. smh.
Regardless, the time for silence is over. Everyone knows something wrong is happening in anti-woke America. Few want to say so out loud. But the hour is very late. It calls for courage.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I can't tell if Rufo is misinformed or simply using words differently that I do, but honestly who cares? I'm just going to post two bills below. I'll supply a few prompts, but you read them and make up your own mind.
Good piece here on the political effects of a college education. Believe it or not, getting a higher ed degree makes people more economically *conservative*, not liberal. So much for the Myth of Campus Socialism.
It's not the professors, by the way. It's the peer groups. That generalizes to pretty much ever political change a student might experience in college. It's the peer groups.
Collin College has fired Professor Lora Burnett. This entire story is outrageous. Burnett criticized her university's re-opening plan (a plan that cost one employee her life), and for that crime, she has been fired. Shame on @collincollege.
But that's not all. The more immediate impetus was a tweet she sent out slamming Mike Pence. Private speech, outside the classroom, etc. But Collin's president didn't care and hauled her in for a dressing down.
Turns out a state legislator had contacted the president about shutting Burnett up. But which? After a good deal of work from @adamsteinbaugh, plus $14k in wasted legal fees by Collin College, the truth came out.
New legislative session, new assault on academic freedom and campus free speech.
In Arkansas, Iowa, Missouri, and Mississippi, GOP reps have introduced bills that punish public schools and universities for teaching anything from the 1619 Project.
These laws are vaguely written, but that's by design. For example, the Iowa bill would withhold funding from any school that utilizes "in whole or in part" the 1619 Project "or any similarly developed curriculum". Gee, I wonder what that means.
It's clear the issue isn't over the Project's factual accuracy, but rather its interpretation of the past. Hence, the MS and AR bills accuse it of promoting “a racially divisive and revisionist account" and the IA bill cites the state's interest in creating "patriotic citizens".
Been thinking this morning about whether there is a tension between critiques of the concept cultural appropriation (eg all cultures appropriate, adapt, evolve) and moderate nationalist @epkaufm-esque arguments against immigration (eg US culture is changing too fast/too much).
These positions don’t have to be in tension, but in practice I think they often are. Both turn (at least in part) on the idea of “feeling at home”, on the claim that one has a right to feel part of a community, or even the right to have one’s community persist over time.
I’m not saying these things are equally just, equally right, etc. And to put my cards in the table, while I have qualified sympathy for cul. app. concerns, I have zero for cultural nationalism. Still, I’m interested in whether, to a certain extent, these distinct ideas rhyme.
I’m going to break my rule of no longer retweeting this asshat because these needs to be exposed and called out. You don’t blame Jews for anti-Semitism.
Holy hell. Look how this Orban shill wastes precisely zero time climbing into the anti-Semitic mud with Lindsay, so great is his partisan hatred for the Left.