I've been tracking state legislatures that have seen the introduction of bills proposing increasing criminal penalties for vandalizing monuments since the 2020 protests. Here's my list:
Alabama HB 133 (2021): would establish the crimes of damaging a public monument in the 1st and 2nd degrees, would provide criminal penalties, including a mandatory minimum sentence for a violation, and would provide for a mandatory holding period for an arrest.
Arizona HB 2552 (2021): damaging a public monument = aggravated criminal damage
SB 1639 (2021): recklessly damaging a public monument = criminal damage and enacts punishments for different degrees
Arkansas HB 1313 (2021): expands offense of defacing or damaging a public building or an object of public respect to damaging any public monument
Florida SB 484 (2021): Injuring or removing a monument = felony
Iowa SB 1140 (2021): acts that damage, deface, alter, or destroy any publicly owned property, including a monument or statue = criminal mischief
Kansas HB 2028 (2021) makes punishment for criminal desecration by damaging, defacing, or destroying any public monument or structure more severe
Maryland SB 443 (2021): imposes criminal penalties for damaging monuments
Massachusetts SB 883 (2021): doubles fine and adds community service for damaging a war or veterans' memorial or monument
Mississippi SB 2034 (2021): creates punishment for defacing public monuments
HB 83 (2021): damaging public monument during "a violent or disorderly assembly" = felony
SB 2043 (2021): defacing a war monument = up to a year in jail + $10K fine
Missouri HB 1018 (2021): elevates classification of monument destruction from A misdemeanor to E felony
SB 66 (2021): add as institutional vandalism the knowing damage or defacement of a public monument
New Jersey A 1999 (2021): Makes desecration of a military monument a crime in the third degree
SB 620 (2021): Increases penalties for purposely desecrating a public monument
S 3261 (2020): enhances penalties for public monument destruction
New York Bill No. A04020 (2021): makes desecration of property commemorating a historical figure a class C felony
Pennsylvania SB 1321 (2020): desecration of public monuments punishable on scale based on severity of damage, to include fences and surrounding protective or decorative barriers.
Tennessee SB 1288 (2021): makes a violation of the heritage protection laws by a public official = Class C misdemeanor
Texas HB 446 (2021): increases the criminal penalty for the offense of criminal mischief involving the damage or destruction of a public monument
Virginia HB 1781 (2021): damaging a monument for war veterans or erected to mark the site of any engagement fought during the Civil War = Class 3 misdemeanor
Washington SB 5059 (2021): increases penalty for defacing a public monument from a misdemeanor to a class C felony
Wisconsin (2020): damaging a public monument = Class I felony - bill proposed by Rep. Rob Hutton, R-Brookfield, and Sen. Tim Carpenter: empowerwisconsin.org/protecting-his…
Thank you to the indefatigable @maczpriest for tracking down the details!
Here's my complementary thread on state legislatures trying to impose restrictions on official removal of monuments:
Since the 2020 protests, thirteen state legislatures have considered bills that would make the removal of public monuments more difficult, ranging from adding a few bureaucratic hoops to flat-out prohibitions. Here's my list:
Georgia HB 238 (2/2021): forbids authorities from removing or concealing any publicly owned monument to any military personnel, whether of US or the Confederate States of America.
Super specific question time: can anyone remember an instance of someone praising an artwork they deliberately destroyed?
I can only think of people saying what they destroyed or damaged was not really art, or not good art (with possible exception of Rauschenberg erasing that de Kooning).
I'm asking because I'm thinking about what a common move it is for iconoclasts (writ broadly) to say they don't think what they're destroying is art or good art. I had been thinking of this as a rhetorical technique, to convince an audience, but I'm starting to wonder if...
Want to know more about how white supremacy is baked in to the US Capitol Building? Let's think about the statue topping its dome. She symbolizes Freedom... and was made in part by Philip Reed, an enslaved man. (Thread)
Thomas Crawford was commissioned to sculpt Freedom in 1854 - but he had to redo his original design (left) after Jefferson Davis threw a temper tantrum about... her hat.
The future president of the Confederacy was then the Secretary of War and oversaw the expansion and decoration of the Capitol Building. He used his position made sure that none of the new sculptures and paintings for the building criticized slavery.
There've been many protests over monuments honoring people who did horrific things. But what does it mean that America's public art is filled with statues of generic white men? Read @intersectionist's brilliant essay on America's imagery of white heritage: intersectionist.medium.com/american-power…
Her essay starts from the question of why no statues have fallen in NYC this year and broadens to explain the white suprematism underlying America’s heritage of public art and architecture, from her point of view as a POC in the white-dominated field of historic preservation.
I'll summarize some of her essay in this thread. She begins by noting that NYC has the dubious honor of being one of the only major US cities that has not lost a statue during the uprisings after the death of George Floyd.
The reserve price for this fossilized heap of Weetabix hasn't been met - shocker! No one's willing to pay more than $12k for an object from a heavily looted conflict zone with absolutely no information about when it entered the US?!?
Also: "Bronze Age Limestone Votive Sculpture" described as standing "in awe before some god the world has now forgotten"? Look, if you can't plausibly fit your fake into a known culture, don't accuse the world of forgetfulness, buddy.