1. For those who consider our Nazi comparison to be too extreme, a thread... This:
2. Leads to this:
3. Leads to this:
4. Leads to this:
5. Leads to this:
5. Which is not a million miles from this:
6. Which is why the High Court said this: ‘We have never had a Cheka, a Stasi or a Gestapo in this country.’ Like us, the High Court ruled against a sinister direction of travel. @threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 2 weeks time, we are at The Court of Appeal challenging the Hate Guidance. Even if you think @HarryTheOwl101 is a nob, please consider throwing something into the pot. We have the opportunity to win this.
We are challenging the practice of police recording names in the absence of a crime, in the absence of hate, in the absence of evidence.
Since October 2020, police must now record children on a Hate Crime database if, for instance, a 15 year old girl objects to a 15 year old penis in the changing rooms.
Extremely worrying:
A Conservative group warns of the United Nations Human Rights Bureau's plan to collect names of organizations or individuals who in any way oppose the LGBT agenda. “Religious narratives” about gender and sexuality also come into focus.
On its website, OHCHR calls for "statements" for the drafting of a report on the subject of "Gender, sexual orientation and gender identity". According to the Christian Post, the editor of the appeal, Victor Madrigal-Borloz -
the "United Nations Independent Expert on Protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity" - is looking for information about the actions of individual nation states with regard to questions of sexual orientation and gender identity-
More coverage of @HarryTheOwl101’s killer point - the police do NOTHING with the ‘hate incident’ info they gather - other than leave it on your police record for onwards disclosure. thetimes.co.uk/article/hate-c…
Let’s just consider ‘escalation’ for a moment. Harry didn’t stop airing his views. He carried on, airing them to all and sundry and is taking the College of Policing to court. On those ‘five steps’ to murder - where do the police think he now is?
Similarly SVP has been reported 3 times to Wiltshire and once to GMP. Pretty clear pattern of escalation there! Is she under surveillance now? If not - why not? What is the point of the police recording that she discussed an article and this upset someone?
Why are malicious people ‘on the edges of rationality’ allowed to make unchallenged and unverified reports about people they don’t like? And why do the police promise them anonymity and a free reign to continue?