Dan Hind Profile picture
27 Feb, 4 tweets, 1 min read
For forty years Labour have been relying on a voting bloc built through unionised workplaces and the broader institutional apparatus of organised labour. Thatcher tore this world apart and Labour never bothered to repair it.
The younger voters who were drawn to Labour as a radical and transformative project in 2015-19 do not identify with the party in anything like the same ways as those formed pre-1979 did. As Labour moves right they might defect far more rapidly than older voters did after 1997.
"They have nowhere else to go" said noted political genius Mandelson about working class voters. It wasn't true then and it is much less true now. Nationalist, municipalist, secessionist and environmentalist parties will make inroads everywhere, would be my guess.
It's hard to escape the conclusion that the current management don't much care. Saving the ship looks like hard work. And if it sinks they and their friends can still hope to be washed up in the paradise of corporate public relations.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dan Hind

Dan Hind Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @danhind

21 Feb
Adam Curtis take! The BBC has a £3.6 bn budget but we are only allow one solitary archivist-auteur, as a treat. Why aren't they commissioning far more in the way of efforts to make sense of the present? And not just by solitary white men of a certain age.
It is telling after 2008 that the BBC made no effort to explain to people what the hell had happened through a landmark documentary series. Doing so would have made austerity a much harder sell, given that cutting to grow was always, as Curtis would say, a fantasy.
It would have been exhilarating to see someone who had predicted the financial collapse set out their reasoning, and present their proposals for reform. Instead we were stuck with the same old mystifications between 2010 and 2015.
Read 7 tweets
26 Jan
Wendy Hoy's letter to the British Medical Journal @bmj_latest calls on the authorities in the UK and US to explain publicly what more data they need before they start using ivermectin, given the "impressive evidence of benefit" and "broad safety record." bmj.com/content/372/bm…
Again, I urge journalists who hate-follow this account to take this up with politicians and their scientific advisors. The evidence base for ivermectin is much stronger than for other treatments already approved. What principles, if any, are informing policy?
Every time I wonder whether I should be sounding off about science policy in a pandemic, I remember that Matt Hancock is the health secretary and think, fuck it, why not.
Read 4 tweets
4 Jan
Today the Times and the Mail have both run stories on #ivermectin based on "leaked slides" from a WHO researcher that found their way onto Youtube. One is paywalled, and the other is ... well, the Mail. thetimes.co.uk/article/iverme…
The UK media needs to up its game, and start looking at the peer-reviewed papers on which these slides were based, and start speaking with clinicians and researchers about what they mean.
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9…
And the rest of us need to think about whether we are well served by this highly centralised and hierarchical system of knowledge production in both science and the media, in which most of us are reduced to the status of tweeting bystanders.
Read 4 tweets
3 Jan
I enjoyed listening to this talk about how we might reinvigorate UK democracy. I was very particularly pleased to hear the presenter call for an opening up of scientific decision-making in a much more open process of democratic deliberation.
I have long been interested in how we give democratic bite and purchase on the conduct of public business. I am particularly interested in the use of political juries to oversee elites, and to develop knowledge that stands outside, and in some senses above ...
... the shared understandings and accommodations of those elites. The life sciences, like finance and many other aspects of public policy, are intensely vulnerable to capture by privileged insiders.
Read 4 tweets
3 Jan
If you are looking at the Conservative party and wondering how they are able to commit the political equivalent of armed robbery year after year with no apparent loss of popularity *it's because the UK media are driving the getaway car.*
Sure, some of the people who should be trying to stop them, nominally left-wing politicians and intellectuals, are working for the same crime syndicates. But they can only pull off this trick because the media keep silent about what they are up to.
It's a big club, and not only are we not in it, we're going to keep being told that it doesn't exist by the people who are, until we create our own, democratic and cooperative media sector. If we can't describe our predicament, we cannot change it.
Read 5 tweets
2 Jan
This peer-reviewed paper has found that early treatment of vulnerable COVID patients leads to much lower death rates compared to those "associated with therapeutic nihilism.”
rcm.imrpress.com/article/2020/2…
"The rates of death in our study indicate that early multidrug therapy is associated with > 90% reduction in mortality among the high risk compared to community rates of death associated with therapeutic nihilism in ambulatory patients who are subsequently hospitalized.”
It’s presumptuous for me to pronounce on health policy, of course. But the Cabinet have no qualms about doing so. And not only are they completely unqualified, they have repeatedly shown that they are useless.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!