Mangy Jay Profile picture
27 Feb, 9 tweets, 2 min read
Collins, Murkowski, Manchin & Sinema occupy the political center, but I think there's a distinction btwn their motivations. Collins & Murkowski feel pressure to demonstrate allegiance to the GOP, whereas Manchin & Sinema feel they must demonstrate independence from their party
This results in a situation where any 1 of these 4 is a potential swing vote. But, in the case of Collins & Murkowski, we have to convince them that it's worth it to break w/ their party, whereas, in the case of Manchin & Sinema, we have to convince them it's worth staying united
In the case of Manchin & Sinema, I think in some cases they are responding to real external pressure (voters in tough states) &, in many other cases, I think they're acting on manufactured pressure they've either imagined or has been inflated by conservatives and/or the press.
I think it's important to understand this dynamic if we want to drag Manchin & Sinema in line. I wish they weren't the way they are, but, given the reality, I think we maximize the possibility of getting their support by recognizing this (irritating) non-partisan posturing
In the case of the minimum wage fight, Manchin & Sinema are not on board w/ $15. If we overrule the parliamentarian, rather than make $15 a separate fight, I think Manchin & Sinema will just become more intractable. It's better for the min wage to make it a separate issue
I'm not defending either of them, btw. Sometimes I think their behavior makes sense and, at other times, I think they're putting on more of a show than responding to actual political pressure. I find Sinema's behavior especially baffling on issues like "Long Senate Traditions."
It does! I think the motivations for the "independents" in either party differ, but the outcome is the same= be wary of becoming overly associated with Democrats.

Collins seemed to feel some pressure to separate herself from the GOP in her election year, but otherwise she seems to feel the opposite: "If there are four issues, you can vote w/ Democrats exactly once, even if you agree w/ them on all of them."
I think it's pretty clear from the context of my thread that when I'm talking about these individuals occupying the political center, I'm talking about Congress, not necessarily electoral opinion. This is why I speak about "manufactured" pressures.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mangy Jay

Mangy Jay Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @magi_jay

1 Mar
In the next sentence the staffer told the Post, “I object to this invasion of my privacy with the use of personal texts. . . These statements are taken out of context and completely misconstrue my relationship with Neera. We had a very close working relationship.”
It's an interesting choice by the @washingtonpost to first publish the texts against the best wishes of one of the participants' & to then go on to promote those same texts w/out citing her objections on social media

What would a journalistic ethics class have to say about this?
We're not talking about a national security issue here. We're talking about a leaked text message from an employee about her boss. A text message she said she didn't want published. A text message that has since been promoted by @washingtonpost reporters w/out that context.
Read 6 tweets
28 Feb
I'm willing to believe that stage was a mistake (or not), but y'all can't support politicians who believe Jewish people are running a global child-murdering cabal then turn around & clutch your chests & proclaim, "Nazi symbols? Us? Impossible!" You lost your plausible deniability
If the Nazi insignia had occurred at a beauty pageant or awards show, wondering about its significance would be conspiratorial. It's not actually conspiratorial to ask questions when we're talking about people who "stumble" upon this imagery while supporting politicians like this Image
"How dare liberals question whether we used Nazi insignia?! Now let me recommence tweeting about how a Jewish man masterminded & funded all of our political opposition in a grand scheme to destroy 'society,' which bears no resemblance whatsoever to 1930's Nazi propaganda." ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
27 Feb
These allegations are well-corroborated and fit a pattern of alleged behavior. I think Cuomo should resign.
If he's gonna wait for an investigation, ok. But I don't see how an investigation is going to show something different than we've already seen. There are contemporaneous text messages about his behavior.
Look, I liked Cuomo during the initial stages of the pandemic too, though it looks like he mishandled several things (nursing homes) in retrospect. But my primary concern here is to principles re: sexual misconduct + the fact that I don't want the Dem party to have this baggage.
Read 5 tweets
27 Feb
I don't know if the CPAC stage being an exact replica of SS insignia was a mistake, but I would like to say: 1. they should explain it & 2. they lost their plausible deniability card a while ago. We're talking about people who made the "ok" sign into a white power symbol
Again, could it be a mistake? Even with the exact same serifs? Sure. But I don't want to hear one peep about "liberals see racism in everything!" from the folks who adore a guy who literally said, "Some of them are good people" about men who shouted, "Jews will not replace us."
If liberals see racism & anti-semitism in everything the GOP does it's b/c much of what they do is racist & anti-semitic. You can't be like, "Oh, soooo hysterical" when you elect people to Congress who believe Jewish people are directing a global cabal whose members eat babies
Read 6 tweets
26 Feb
The structure of the Senate gives disproportionate power to a minority of the population. This minority happens to be represented by economically & socially regressive people. There is no reason to preserve Senate rules that further exacerbate this power imbalance (filibuster).
That said, Manchin & Sinema won't support abolishing the filibuster (though perhaps they could support "reform?"). Hopefully they can be convinced to change their minds, but they're not there yet. So, the only option Dems have *right now* for COVID relief is reconciliation.
reconciliation requires that provisions in a bill meet the Byrd rule. Democrats did the right thing in trying to get the minimum wage through, though it was always a strong possibility the parlimentarian would rule it didn't meet the rules.
Read 7 tweets
25 Feb
HIV/AIDS didn't just decimate the LGBTQ community in terms of mass death. The bigoted stigma attached to it-in addition to generalized bigotry-made it almost impossible to come out. I am an older millennial & I remember being taught that it was ok to share air w/ an HIV+ person
I don't think that cishet people reflect enough on just what that meant for all LGBTQ people. First, one was already considered as deviant or a sinner by the dominant culture. Abused by parents & employers. It was nearly impossible to be fully "out." And then came HIV/AIDS.
I remember as a kid in the 90's, there was a deep, bigoted entanglement between being gay & AIDS in US culture. There was little compassion &, if it occurred, it was in whispers. There was also a distinction btwn AIDS victims who "deserved" it (gay men) vs. others (hemophiliacs)
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!