You've probably seen tweets about a YouGov survey which says 'almost half of Britons have little to no sympathy' for 'the migrants' crossing the channel.
On the left is one of the tweets, and on the right is how YouGov presented it.
It is worth looking a bit deeper...
As background, you will know that many people have trouble feeling empathy for large groups.
This is one of the reasons that charity campaigns use images of individuals rather than groups.
It is why the image on the left feels somehow more harrowing than the image on the right.
You will also know that there is occasionally debate over the words 'migrant', 'refugee', and 'asylum seeker', and that in this case YouGov have chosen to ask about 'the migrants'.
Maybe this wording & the 'group empathy' issue make a difference, maybe they does not.
Historically when you went from Website A to Website B, an http referer header told Website B 'This visitor came from WebsiteA.com, and they were looking at a page at '/category/dresses/?sort=low-to-high' (called the 'path', but most users think of it as the page).
For years that was absolute norm; Google even allowed sites to see which keywords users had searched for before reaching their site. (still do if you pay for ads)
When more sites started moving to https, in most cases, visits between https & http, the 'page' info would be hidden