Israel faces a moral, strategic, epidemiological, and diplomatic imperative to help Palestinians achieve rapid COVID vaccination in the occupied territories. So far, the story is a huge Israeli failure on each of these fronts. (1/n)
COVID is a looming public health disaster in Palestinian areas. As the party w/military control, Israel has a legal+moral responsibility to ensure that people are vaccinated. This is separate+apart from the many other historic+security differences between the two peoples. (2/n)
From an epidemiological and economic perspective, it is ridiculous to believe that Israel would avoid serious harms if COVID is allowed to spread rapidly in Gaza and the West Bank. Israel's impressive vaccination of Jewish+non-Jewish Israelis won't forestall these harms. (3/n)
From a coldly strategic perspective, this has been a giant and obvious missed opportunity for an Israeli diplomatic/public relations layup. Palestinians will always remember who was there, and who wasn't there for them when the pandemic struck. So will everyone else. (4/n)
When I was a kid, a standard argument I heard in Jewish youth groups+elsewhere was that Israeli occupation authorities promoted the health of Palestinians under occupation. I remember a speaker in college joking that Ariel Sharon should be called the Surgeon General. (5/n)
There was always much wrong with these arguments. But there was an implicit promise and claim there, too--an acknowledgement of legal and humanitarian obligation, and a realization that there is much Israel can do. Now is a moment to honor these obligations. (6/n)
I hope America intervenes. The Biden administration has a huge opportunity, too. We can save lives. Helping people in their hour of vulnerability and need is always a good idea. Palestinians will remember what we do--or don't do--as well. (7/7)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today’s @nytimes story highlights a familiar but lethal disparity issue in COVID-19 care: Ensuring that patients get care at the right hospitals--and that hospitals actually providing such care have the resources they need for proper care. nytimes.com/2021/02/08/us/… Thread (1/n)
Vaccines, PPE, distancing+hand-washing are obviously critical. Another immediate imperative to save lives: Ensuring that COVID patients receive care at hospitals w/staffing, resources+expertise to treat them—and that front-line hospitals are supported with these resources. (2/n)
Dr. James Mahoney’s death last April from COVID early last year offers one heartbreaking case. nytimes.com/2020/05/18/nyr… [pics]. Too many other cases continue to accumulate.(3/n)
Today's intentionally over-simplified+bad-graphic nerd moment seeks to explain why we must keep masking, hand-washing+distancing even after we have a good but imperfect vaccine that reduces transmission by some amount gamma--maybe 70%. Why am I using Greek letters? No idea. (2/n)
Suppose people contract COVID+randomly mix w/others lambda times/day. Each time infected+uninfected person meet, Infection is transmitted w/probability kappa. Infectedsleave the population with probability delta/day. Kappa+lambda can be reduced through distancing+masking. (3/n)
I've been thinking lately about what makes Twitter so toxic. Aside from its obvious problems, I think we all need to rethink "dunking-on" culture. And I've come to believe that winning arguments is often over-rated in creating lasting change+political reforms. (1/n=10)
Building relationship, sharing perspectives, and genuinely listening are usually much more important than besting someone in an argument. I felt this first-hand doing GOTV in 2008, 12+16. I teach health policy. So I probably know more policy than the ambivalent voter (2/n)
who greets me at her doorstep. What would I accomplish by out-debating her about ACA or whatever? Generally nothing. Less than nothing. She'd be embarrassed+probably hardened in her perspective, only sorry that her smart cousin wasn't around, who would have really kicked (3/n)
The NY AG suggests that the Trump Foundation is a comprehensive fraud. I fully believe this, but I am also truly puzzled. (thread). nytimes.com/2018/12/18/nyr…
I'm not surprised that the Foundation is riddled with self-dealing, hidden favoratism, and tax scams. washingtonpost.com/politics/trump…
I'm not surprised that the Foundation's main purpose other than these scams is to promote Trump himself. washingtonpost.com/news/post-poli…
58. I share the anger that leads many of us to shun President Trump+his core political team. Let’s do so with cold civility, properly acerbic but with no profanity or screaming, let alone any form of physical intimidation.
59. We should proceed with confidence. Most Americans don’t want 5-year-olds separated from their parents at the border or millions of people to lose Medicaid. They don’t want tax cuts for the top 1%.
60. They also don’t want the Supreme Court to overrule Roe v. Wade or to protect President Trump from legal difficulty. Democrats may not be able to defeat Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination, though this provides a powerful mobilization opportunity. crooked.com/article/trump-…
33. The President pursues many policies that hurt millions of people, often vulnerable+politically marginalized people. The Muslim ban+his cruelty towards immigrants are the most obvious examples of measures that must be strongly resisted.
34. He has key weaknesses. He is angry, nervously defensive+deeply unpopular despite a strong economy which should have boosted his fundamentals. His immigration, health+tax policies are quite unpopular outside his base. That’s one reason he lies about these policies so much.
35.He rightly perceives that he holds the official levers of the presidency, but lacks the moral+political legitimacy every one of his predecessors walked into office with. His presidency carries a huge asterisk+everyone knows it.