Going back and looking at it now, it's almost offensive how bad Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam was.
Seriously, like, how do you manage to create a crossover between Mario & Luigi and Paper Mario and provide ZERO fanservice to players from either series?
There's no plot. There's no callbacks or references to anything from either series. The battle mechanics aren't fun. The exploration isn't fun. It doesn't even feel like an RPG, it feels like a bunch of Toad-rescuing minigames with an overworld.
The entire premise of how the worlds crossed over feels contrived. None of the unique characters from either series are included. You never get to go into the paper world. There are no unique villains. You can't even play as Paper Luigi, which makes NO sense.
Just spitballing, I can think of a more interesting way this game could have been executed.
What if the book holding the Paper Mario universe was stored in an ancient temple under the Mushroom Kingdom, guarded by an immortal Magikoopa librarian for millennia. Then, one day...
...the Dark Lord of Books persuades Bowser to help him break into this library, so he can seize the Paper universe's power and reshape the world in his image. The librarian rips the book into pieces and scatters it over the world to keep it safe, but as a consequence...
...the Paper characters are scattered into the real world. Learning what's going on, Mario and Luigi team up with their paper counterparts and travel to a bunch of locations from past games, like the Beanbean Kingdom, Star Hill, Plack Beach, Pi'illo Castle...
...and at each of these locations they meet characters from the first three Paper Mario games and dive into the pages, which contain locations from those games, to seize the artifacts that will let the Lord of Books harness the paper realm's power.
Now tell me, isn't that more interesting than "Oh no, both Bowsers have kidnapped both princesses, both Marios have to rescue them!"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is what everyone who pushes this stupid "plantation" talking point fails to understand.
Black people don't just vote for the Democratic Party. Black people *are* the Democratic Party. They hold key offices. They decide the outcome of our primaries. They write our platform.
Now, does every Black voter think and act the same? Of course not. And if Black conservatives want to argue, we have a right not to have our beliefs profiled because of our race, that's completely fair!
But to claim the majority of Black voters were bought off, instead of...
It makes a lot of sense. And it's also a danger sign for Republicans that their overperformance with Latino voters may be very hard to replicate once the pandemic's gone and things start recovering.
It's not an excuse for Democrats to sit back and think nonwhite votes will fall into their laps though. Republicans saw a message opening and they took it. If it's not lockdowns, it could be something else. We need to be in these communities and engaging with voters' needs.
It's often assumed that Trump would have won without COVID. But now I'm not so sure.
He might have done a little better in the Midwest, so WI might have gone red. But I also think TX and FL might have been closer, and Democrats might have performed better in House races.
For anyone who doesn't live in Central TX, let me wrap your head around how insane this is.
I lived in this area from 1992-2003 and then again from 2015-2020. In that ENTIRE TIME, I have seen it snow *twice*, and neither time did it actually accumulate on the ground.
Even six inches of snow in, say, Boston, would shut some stuff down.
Six inches of snow in Texas is a catastrophe. They have no plows. No road salt. Homes and water lines are not adequately insulated. Oil and gas pipelines aren't equipped for de-icing.
And as if all that weren't bad enough, because ground temperature is more stable than air temperature, you have six inches of snow falling on relatively warm surfaces, meaning that the bottom layer pretty much immediately turns to ice. So all the roads are basically undriveable.
Followers, please help @fawfulfanswife. She was a little late to drip our faucets and our pipes are already starting to freeze. She doesn't have a space heater or hair dryer.
Any ideas for how to keep our lines warm?
UPDATE: She has opened every cupboard, opened every tap to a trickle (though most are already frozen), and is going to pour some salt down our drains and wrap the pipes in towels. And that seems to be all we can do for now.
UPDATE 2: Jessica and I realized that we were overlooking an appliance we have that is portable and can warm things: scent warmers!
Everything about @brad_polumbo's argument here is wrong.
First, the vast majority of minimum wage earners are not teenagers — 88 percent of minimum wage earners are over 20, a third are over 40, and most are supporting a family. epi.org/publication/wa…
Second, from a historical standpoint, that's just not the purpose of the minimum wage.
The point is not to set a base salary for career development. It's to keep every fulltime worker above the poverty line. The original lawmakers were very clear on that. historynewsnetwork.org/article/164635
Third, there is scant evidence the minimum wage affects employment much in the first place, teenage or otherwise.
Of course it costs businesses money, but studies suggest that cost comes out of prices or overhead inefficiencies, not hiring fewer workers. businessforafairminimumwage.org/news/00135/res…
One reason I've never much liked the phrase "trickle-down economics" is that it's kind of a straw man.
The GOP's argument was never literally that by cutting taxes for the rich, their extra money would somehow magically find its way into the pockets of lower-income people.
Rather, their argument was, under lower taxes, businesses can afford to produce more, and with a higher supply of goods and services, cost of living will become cheaper to the point where the poor can get by on the money they already have.
The big flaw with GOP supply-side economics is that not all goods and services are equally price-elastic, and the big bulk of working people's expenses are housing and health care — two things that are extremely *insensitive* to supply.