I think the only way this could be justifiable is if it is a clever advert for @Baddiel's book. I mean, literally has "Should Jews count" in the title...
There is an interesting debate whether Jews are a religion/ethnicity/ethnicities. In law, being Jewish is both a race and a religion for discrimination, harassment etc. But the framing here - as "will we let Jews be an ethnic minority" is insensitive and historically ignorant
Rather than go into more detail I recommend watching @benjamincohen's interview as he put it really well
Reality is there are few Jews in Britain (c300,000) so it's no surprise that we have to regularly face ignorance and be educators. But given 2/3 of Europe's Jewish population (very much seen as an ethnicity) were murdered in living memory it isn't too much to expect sensitivity
Many Jews (including me) struggle on diversity forms about which box to tick. Black and minority ethnic? White "other"? Or for non-white Jews, errr? I would prefer the form to say "Jewish" and don't really understand why it doesn't but ho hum
And you will often find British Jews struggling to agree as to how to approach these kind of issues - understandably as in recent history Jews were murdered in their millions whether they were identifiably Jewish or 'assimilated'. Hitler didn't discriminate in that sense
But, as I said, despite there being a debate over Jews being an ethnicity or a religion, any discussion should be sensitive to the very recent genocide which you might think entitles Jews to be sensitive to non-Jews asking whether they "should" be counted as one thing or other
This is hardly the first time that the courts have said the Secretary of State should be given the benefit of the doubt on judgments national security.
But...
The courts (and the Human Rights Act) are supposed to be a safety net to temper executive power.
And that is particularly important when political decisions are taken at the expense of an individual's rights because the person is unpopular and the decision is therefore popular.
You may say Sajid Javid had only security motives when stripping Begum of her citizenship.
But consider, for a moment, if he did not.
What check and balance is in place to ensure she has a fair chance of revealing that?
Just reading this absolutely fascinating Lords debate on the 2008 amendment to the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 which inserted the part which has allowed for the Covid-19 regulations to be issued hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2008-05-…
Vaccine passports (to access venues, jobs etc) are another difficult, almost paradoxical, COVID issue from a rights perspective. Can both interfere with (privacy, discrimination) and enable access to (gatherings, family, 'open society') rights. Not straightforward.
I pointed out a similar rights paradox (I realise that's not really the right word) about lockdown. If we had locked down earlier and more strictly, we may still have had 175 days of it (see previous tweets) but less disease and deaths. unherd.com/2021/02/the-da…
But 'current pain for future gain' is itself a slippery slope as a justification for policies, so needs to be carefully considered.
I heard an interesting podcast about how privacy concerns may have led to a missed opportunity for use of real time data with contact tracing apps
One of the sad and largely untold stories of the year-long lockdown is it has been illegal for many people who don’t live together to meet indoors, meaning many in relationships haven’t been able to meet. @susie_alegre makes good points in this article cityam.com/squeamish-mini…
This has in my view been a huge oversight by the govt which has responded to calls from, for example, people with babies under one who are lonely to be able to form a linked household. It would have been simple to allow people in established relationship to form linked households
Some gatherings are prohibited but if you read the law itself there are many exceptions including where reasonably necessary for:
- Work
- Volunteering
- Accessing social services
- Assisting vulnerable people
- Suport groups
- Avoiding harm..