Who wants to talk about the history of law clerking? Everybody? Good. Let’s pull up a chair for a little judicial administration history….⚖️🧵 (1/x)
According to the late (Second Circuit (❤️) Judge) J. Daniel Mahoney, the "institution of clerking" (don’t you love that phrase?) began over a century ago. It is largely undisputed that the first jurist to utilize legal assistants was one Horace Gray. (2/x)
Who was Horace Gray and why did he feel the need to employ a law clerk? Well, in 1873 he became the Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court of Errors (which could be the subject of its own twitter thread…) and found that his workload had increased considerably.
So what did the enterprising Chief Justice Gray do? Again, according to Judge Mahoney, he employed the services of a law assistant in the summer of 1875. Mahoney adds that Gray’s first law clerk was a recently graduated and highly ranked @Harvard_Law student. (4/x)
(I will just add here that as a @YaleLawSch alumna myself, I will not be commenting upon Chief Justice Gray's tastes in law clerks. @YPractitioners, I am sure you support this decision. 😉)
In December 1881, President Chester A. Arthur nominated Gray to fill the vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court created by the death of Nathan Clifford. (And if you're like, “who?” don’t worry – I have no doubt that the @SCHSociety has got you covered.) (6/x)
Apparently subscribing to the view that no man should be left behind, Justice Gray took his law clerk to Washington with him (and paid his salary out of his own pocket – a practice, in Judge Mahoney's words, that has “fallen into fortunate disuse” - !). (7/x)
In 1885, Att'y Gen. A. H. Garland (indeed, there has been an AG Garland before – the fun facts here abound!) suggested that “[i]t would greatly facilitate the business of the Supreme Court if each justice was provided by law with a secretary or law clerk to be a stenographer."
In 1886, Congress followed AG Garland’s recommendation and provided a “stenographic clerk” to each justice . . . at a salary of $1,600. (9/x)
Now Justice Gray, for his part, had no interest in demoting his clerk to a mere stenographer. Indeed, he continued to use his clerks to draft the occasional opinion (to be used as a source of discussion) and to review opinions proposed by the other Justices. (10/x)
As Judge Mahoney concludes, “It is fair to say that Justice Gray was not only the founder of the institution of ‘law clerking,’ but also the draftsman of the role a law clerk was thereafter to perform." (I'm not crying; you're crying.) (11/x)
For those interested in a post script (aka everyone), in 1919, Congress authorized the Justices to hire a true “law clerk” (as opposed to a mere “stenographic clerk"). And in 1921, Chief Justice Taft, a lover of judicial administration, became the first Justice to rely upon both.
And for those interested in a post post script (again, everyone), in 1930, Congress provided each federal appellate judge one law clerk. In 1936, the same courtesy was afforded to district court judges. (Fin) #IHeartJudicialAdministration #TheMoreYouKnowAboutCourts

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marin K Levy

Marin K Levy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @marinklevy

30 Nov 20
Following up on an insight from the great @joshchafetz (naturally), a quick thread on what I see as one of the blind spots of the legal academy, concerning methodologies… (🧵1/9)
I’ve always started from the position that the primary goal of the legal academy – as with the rest of the academy – is the production of knowledge. If that’s so, then it would seem we should value a number of different methodologies and approaches… (2/9)
It is important that we acquire more information about how the world works from empiricists – both quantitative and qualitative. It’s important to know how the world once worked from legal historians. (3/9)
Read 10 tweets
20 Nov 20
With the Court announcing new circuit allotments today, I know what you're thinking - huh, what is the story behind these allotments? Well have I got you covered! Here’s a little judicial administration history thread (with much of the underlying info c/o @FedJudicialHist).⚖️🧵1/
Let's cast our minds back to 1789...remember that the Justices initially had responsibilities on the circuit courts. Specifically, the First Judiciary Act created 3 geographical circuits (Eastern, Middle & Southern) to which the Justices were assigned for circuit riding. 2/
A few years later (in the Act of April 13, 1791) Congress mandated that the Court issue a written order at each session, indicating the circuits to which the Justices would be assigned. Seems totally fine, right? Well... 3/
Read 16 tweets
31 Oct 20
In the mood for a distraction? Yearning to learn more about en banc courts? Do I have the mini judicial administration thread for you…⚖️🧵🎃 (1 / 11-ish)
First, a word about terminology (c/o the incomparable Judge Jon O. Newman) – “en banc” can be traced back to the Latin “in banco” – the ablative of “bancus” or “bench.” JON notes that a well-regarded etymologist indefnties a use of in banco in English writing in 1645, and...(2)
...a first use of the Anglicized “in bank” in 1768 in Blackstone’s Commentaries. “In banc” apparently came into fashion in England in the 1800s. But, being the Francophile that I am, I prefer “en banc.” (3/11ish)
Read 14 tweets
15 Oct 20
I appreciate that the Republicans are now trying to emphasize that filling vacancies does not equal "court packing" - but they were not always so careful with words. Back in 2013, this is precisely what some accused President Obama of doing when he filled 3 DC Circuit vacancies.
159 CONG. REC. 16,594 (2013) (statement of @JohnCornyn) (“I think the evidence is overwhelming that what the President is trying to do by nominating these unneeded judges to [the D.C. Circuit], the second most powerful court in the Nation, is he is trying to pack the court...").
@LindseyGrahamSC also referred to filling the D.C. Circuit seats as "court packing," later saying that he told Harry Reid and President Obama that "the consequence of changing the rules in the Senate to pack the court will come back to haunt them.” perma.cc/6REN-PYQL%5D
Read 5 tweets
13 Oct 20
Do you remember when Juliet asks aloud, "What's in a name?" Clearly she was talking about the DC Circuit's many stylings over the years... (mini ⚖️🧵, 1/x)
In 1801 we see the creation of the Circuit Court for the District of Columbia, thanks to the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1801. (Since we are talking about names, I have to confess that I love the name of that Act.) (2/x)
Now quick frolic – (I promise it will be fun) – the first three judges appointed to that court were Thomas Johnson (who refused to serve – the nerve!), James Marshall (brother of everyone’s favorite Chief Justice) and William Cranch (Supreme Court Reporter extraordinaire)! (3/x)
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!